Cargando…
Research progress in laboratory detection of SARS-CoV-2
BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid testing is a reliable method for diagnosing viral infection in clinical samples. However, when the number of cases is huge and there are individual differences in the virus itself, the probability of false-negative results increases. With the advancement in research on the n...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7990494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33763777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02604-4 |
_version_ | 1783669084931489792 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Hao-jia Xiang, Yang-hui Hu, Rui Ji, Rui Wang, Yu-ping |
author_facet | Wang, Hao-jia Xiang, Yang-hui Hu, Rui Ji, Rui Wang, Yu-ping |
author_sort | Wang, Hao-jia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid testing is a reliable method for diagnosing viral infection in clinical samples. However, when the number of cases is huge and there are individual differences in the virus itself, the probability of false-negative results increases. With the advancement in research on the new coronavirus, new detection technologies that use serum-specific antibodies as detection targets have been developed. These detection technologies have high efficiency and shorter turnaround time, which ultimately shortens the time required for diagnosis. This article summarizes the methods that have been reported to date for the detection of the new coronavirus and discusses their principles and technical characteristics. AIMS: Compare the advantages and disadvantages of various SARS-CoV-2 detection methods and analyze their principles. METHODS: Searched reports on SARS-CoV-2 detection methods published so far, extracted the data and analyzed them. Use the primer blast function of NCBI to analyze the primers used in qRT-PCR detection. RESULTS: The detection sensitivity was the highest when nucleocapsid protein gene was used as the target, reaching 96.6%. The detection efficiency of the remaining targets ranged from 66.7% to 96.0%. Various new detection methods, like Serum specific antibody detection, can speed up the test time. However, due to the complexity of the method and higher testing requirements, it seems that it cannot be used as a complete replacement for qRT-PRC testing. CONCLUSIONS: With the advancement of technology and the improvement of methods, the detection methods of SARSCoV-2 have become more mature. These advances provided great help to the detection of SARS-CoV-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7990494 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79904942021-03-25 Research progress in laboratory detection of SARS-CoV-2 Wang, Hao-jia Xiang, Yang-hui Hu, Rui Ji, Rui Wang, Yu-ping Ir J Med Sci Review Article BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid testing is a reliable method for diagnosing viral infection in clinical samples. However, when the number of cases is huge and there are individual differences in the virus itself, the probability of false-negative results increases. With the advancement in research on the new coronavirus, new detection technologies that use serum-specific antibodies as detection targets have been developed. These detection technologies have high efficiency and shorter turnaround time, which ultimately shortens the time required for diagnosis. This article summarizes the methods that have been reported to date for the detection of the new coronavirus and discusses their principles and technical characteristics. AIMS: Compare the advantages and disadvantages of various SARS-CoV-2 detection methods and analyze their principles. METHODS: Searched reports on SARS-CoV-2 detection methods published so far, extracted the data and analyzed them. Use the primer blast function of NCBI to analyze the primers used in qRT-PCR detection. RESULTS: The detection sensitivity was the highest when nucleocapsid protein gene was used as the target, reaching 96.6%. The detection efficiency of the remaining targets ranged from 66.7% to 96.0%. Various new detection methods, like Serum specific antibody detection, can speed up the test time. However, due to the complexity of the method and higher testing requirements, it seems that it cannot be used as a complete replacement for qRT-PRC testing. CONCLUSIONS: With the advancement of technology and the improvement of methods, the detection methods of SARSCoV-2 have become more mature. These advances provided great help to the detection of SARS-CoV-2. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-24 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC7990494/ /pubmed/33763777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02604-4 Text en © Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Wang, Hao-jia Xiang, Yang-hui Hu, Rui Ji, Rui Wang, Yu-ping Research progress in laboratory detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title | Research progress in laboratory detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full | Research progress in laboratory detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_fullStr | Research progress in laboratory detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full_unstemmed | Research progress in laboratory detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_short | Research progress in laboratory detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_sort | research progress in laboratory detection of sars-cov-2 |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7990494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33763777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02604-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanghaojia researchprogressinlaboratorydetectionofsarscov2 AT xiangyanghui researchprogressinlaboratorydetectionofsarscov2 AT hurui researchprogressinlaboratorydetectionofsarscov2 AT jirui researchprogressinlaboratorydetectionofsarscov2 AT wangyuping researchprogressinlaboratorydetectionofsarscov2 |