Cargando…

Implementation strategies in emergency management of children: A scoping review

BACKGROUND: Implementation strategies are vital for the uptake of evidence to improve health, healthcare delivery, and decision-making. Medical or mental emergencies may be life-threatening, especially in children, due to their unique physiological needs when presenting in the emergency departments...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aregbesola, Alex, Abou-Setta, Ahmed M., Okoli, George N., Jeyaraman, Maya M., Lam, Otto, Kasireddy, Viraj, Copstein, Leslie, Askin, Nicole, Sibley, Kathryn M., Klassen, Terry P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7990517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248826
_version_ 1783669088617234432
author Aregbesola, Alex
Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.
Okoli, George N.
Jeyaraman, Maya M.
Lam, Otto
Kasireddy, Viraj
Copstein, Leslie
Askin, Nicole
Sibley, Kathryn M.
Klassen, Terry P.
author_facet Aregbesola, Alex
Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.
Okoli, George N.
Jeyaraman, Maya M.
Lam, Otto
Kasireddy, Viraj
Copstein, Leslie
Askin, Nicole
Sibley, Kathryn M.
Klassen, Terry P.
author_sort Aregbesola, Alex
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Implementation strategies are vital for the uptake of evidence to improve health, healthcare delivery, and decision-making. Medical or mental emergencies may be life-threatening, especially in children, due to their unique physiological needs when presenting in the emergency departments (EDs). Thus, practice change in EDs attending to children requires evidence-informed considerations regarding the best approaches to implementing research evidence. We aimed to identify and map the characteristics of implementation strategies used in the emergency management of children. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review using Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. We searched four databases [Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Central (Wiley) and CINAHL (Ebsco)] from inception to May 2019, for implementation studies in children (≤21 years) in emergency settings. Two pairs of reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted the data. We performed a descriptive analysis of the included studies. RESULTS: We included 87 studies from a total of 9,607 retrieved citations. Most of the studies were before and after study design (n = 68, 61%) conducted in North America (n = 63, 70%); less than one-tenth of the included studies (n = 7, 8%) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). About one-third of the included studies used a single strategy to improve the uptake of research evidence. Dissemination strategies were more commonly utilized (n = 77, 89%) compared to other implementation strategies; process (n = 47, 54%), integration (n = 49, 56%), and capacity building and scale-up strategies (n = 13, 15%). Studies that adopted capacity building and scale-up as part of the strategies were most effective (100%) compared to dissemination (90%), process (88%) and integration (85%). CONCLUSIONS: Studies on implementation strategies in emergency management of children have mostly been non-randomized studies. This review suggests that ‘dissemination’ is the most common strategy used, and ‘capacity building and scale-up’ are the most effective strategies. Higher-quality evidence from randomized-controlled trials is needed to accurately assess the effectiveness of implementation strategies in emergency management of children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7990517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79905172021-04-05 Implementation strategies in emergency management of children: A scoping review Aregbesola, Alex Abou-Setta, Ahmed M. Okoli, George N. Jeyaraman, Maya M. Lam, Otto Kasireddy, Viraj Copstein, Leslie Askin, Nicole Sibley, Kathryn M. Klassen, Terry P. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Implementation strategies are vital for the uptake of evidence to improve health, healthcare delivery, and decision-making. Medical or mental emergencies may be life-threatening, especially in children, due to their unique physiological needs when presenting in the emergency departments (EDs). Thus, practice change in EDs attending to children requires evidence-informed considerations regarding the best approaches to implementing research evidence. We aimed to identify and map the characteristics of implementation strategies used in the emergency management of children. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review using Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. We searched four databases [Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Central (Wiley) and CINAHL (Ebsco)] from inception to May 2019, for implementation studies in children (≤21 years) in emergency settings. Two pairs of reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted the data. We performed a descriptive analysis of the included studies. RESULTS: We included 87 studies from a total of 9,607 retrieved citations. Most of the studies were before and after study design (n = 68, 61%) conducted in North America (n = 63, 70%); less than one-tenth of the included studies (n = 7, 8%) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). About one-third of the included studies used a single strategy to improve the uptake of research evidence. Dissemination strategies were more commonly utilized (n = 77, 89%) compared to other implementation strategies; process (n = 47, 54%), integration (n = 49, 56%), and capacity building and scale-up strategies (n = 13, 15%). Studies that adopted capacity building and scale-up as part of the strategies were most effective (100%) compared to dissemination (90%), process (88%) and integration (85%). CONCLUSIONS: Studies on implementation strategies in emergency management of children have mostly been non-randomized studies. This review suggests that ‘dissemination’ is the most common strategy used, and ‘capacity building and scale-up’ are the most effective strategies. Higher-quality evidence from randomized-controlled trials is needed to accurately assess the effectiveness of implementation strategies in emergency management of children. Public Library of Science 2021-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7990517/ /pubmed/33761525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248826 Text en © 2021 Aregbesola et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Aregbesola, Alex
Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.
Okoli, George N.
Jeyaraman, Maya M.
Lam, Otto
Kasireddy, Viraj
Copstein, Leslie
Askin, Nicole
Sibley, Kathryn M.
Klassen, Terry P.
Implementation strategies in emergency management of children: A scoping review
title Implementation strategies in emergency management of children: A scoping review
title_full Implementation strategies in emergency management of children: A scoping review
title_fullStr Implementation strategies in emergency management of children: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Implementation strategies in emergency management of children: A scoping review
title_short Implementation strategies in emergency management of children: A scoping review
title_sort implementation strategies in emergency management of children: a scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7990517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248826
work_keys_str_mv AT aregbesolaalex implementationstrategiesinemergencymanagementofchildrenascopingreview
AT abousettaahmedm implementationstrategiesinemergencymanagementofchildrenascopingreview
AT okoligeorgen implementationstrategiesinemergencymanagementofchildrenascopingreview
AT jeyaramanmayam implementationstrategiesinemergencymanagementofchildrenascopingreview
AT lamotto implementationstrategiesinemergencymanagementofchildrenascopingreview
AT kasireddyviraj implementationstrategiesinemergencymanagementofchildrenascopingreview
AT copsteinleslie implementationstrategiesinemergencymanagementofchildrenascopingreview
AT askinnicole implementationstrategiesinemergencymanagementofchildrenascopingreview
AT sibleykathrynm implementationstrategiesinemergencymanagementofchildrenascopingreview
AT klassenterryp implementationstrategiesinemergencymanagementofchildrenascopingreview