Cargando…

Graft choice for isolated MPFL reconstruction: gracilis versus semitendinosus

INTRODUCTION: After the first patellar dislocation, most patients report damage of the medio-patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and surgical reconstruction is required. The purpose of this study is to systematically review current evidence and to clarify the role of the gracilis and semitendinosus tendo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Migliorini, Filippo, Trivellas, Andromahi, Driessen, Arne, Quack, Valentin, Tingart, Markus, Eschweiler, Jörg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7990750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32008097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02636-z
_version_ 1783669114094485504
author Migliorini, Filippo
Trivellas, Andromahi
Driessen, Arne
Quack, Valentin
Tingart, Markus
Eschweiler, Jörg
author_facet Migliorini, Filippo
Trivellas, Andromahi
Driessen, Arne
Quack, Valentin
Tingart, Markus
Eschweiler, Jörg
author_sort Migliorini, Filippo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: After the first patellar dislocation, most patients report damage of the medio-patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and surgical reconstruction is required. The purpose of this study is to systematically review current evidence and to clarify the role of the gracilis and semitendinosus tendons as graft for isolated MPFL reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in October 2019. All clinical trials using the semitendinosus and/or gracilis tendon grafts for isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with patellofemoral instability were considered for inclusion. Only articles reporting a minimum of 12-month follow-up were considered. The PEDro score was used for the methodological quality assessment. RESULTS: Data from 1491 procedures were collected. The mean follow-up was 36.12 months. There was comparability among the patient baseline. All the scores of interests (Kujala, Tegner, Lysholm) and range of motion scored better in the semitendinosus group. Moreover, in favour of the semitendinosus group, a statistically significant reduction of the revision surgeries and re-dislocations were evidenced. Apprehension test and persistent instability sensation found any statistical correlations. CONCLUSION: Isolated MPFL reconstruction through semitendinosus tendon graft performed better than the gracilis in selected patients suffering from recurrent patellofemoral instability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7990750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79907502021-04-12 Graft choice for isolated MPFL reconstruction: gracilis versus semitendinosus Migliorini, Filippo Trivellas, Andromahi Driessen, Arne Quack, Valentin Tingart, Markus Eschweiler, Jörg Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol General Review INTRODUCTION: After the first patellar dislocation, most patients report damage of the medio-patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and surgical reconstruction is required. The purpose of this study is to systematically review current evidence and to clarify the role of the gracilis and semitendinosus tendons as graft for isolated MPFL reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in October 2019. All clinical trials using the semitendinosus and/or gracilis tendon grafts for isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with patellofemoral instability were considered for inclusion. Only articles reporting a minimum of 12-month follow-up were considered. The PEDro score was used for the methodological quality assessment. RESULTS: Data from 1491 procedures were collected. The mean follow-up was 36.12 months. There was comparability among the patient baseline. All the scores of interests (Kujala, Tegner, Lysholm) and range of motion scored better in the semitendinosus group. Moreover, in favour of the semitendinosus group, a statistically significant reduction of the revision surgeries and re-dislocations were evidenced. Apprehension test and persistent instability sensation found any statistical correlations. CONCLUSION: Isolated MPFL reconstruction through semitendinosus tendon graft performed better than the gracilis in selected patients suffering from recurrent patellofemoral instability. Springer Paris 2020-02-01 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7990750/ /pubmed/32008097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02636-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle General Review
Migliorini, Filippo
Trivellas, Andromahi
Driessen, Arne
Quack, Valentin
Tingart, Markus
Eschweiler, Jörg
Graft choice for isolated MPFL reconstruction: gracilis versus semitendinosus
title Graft choice for isolated MPFL reconstruction: gracilis versus semitendinosus
title_full Graft choice for isolated MPFL reconstruction: gracilis versus semitendinosus
title_fullStr Graft choice for isolated MPFL reconstruction: gracilis versus semitendinosus
title_full_unstemmed Graft choice for isolated MPFL reconstruction: gracilis versus semitendinosus
title_short Graft choice for isolated MPFL reconstruction: gracilis versus semitendinosus
title_sort graft choice for isolated mpfl reconstruction: gracilis versus semitendinosus
topic General Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7990750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32008097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02636-z
work_keys_str_mv AT migliorinifilippo graftchoiceforisolatedmpflreconstructiongracilisversussemitendinosus
AT trivellasandromahi graftchoiceforisolatedmpflreconstructiongracilisversussemitendinosus
AT driessenarne graftchoiceforisolatedmpflreconstructiongracilisversussemitendinosus
AT quackvalentin graftchoiceforisolatedmpflreconstructiongracilisversussemitendinosus
AT tingartmarkus graftchoiceforisolatedmpflreconstructiongracilisversussemitendinosus
AT eschweilerjorg graftchoiceforisolatedmpflreconstructiongracilisversussemitendinosus