Cargando…
Individual Differences in Working Memory and the N2pc
The lateralized ERP N2pc component has been shown to be an effective marker of attentional object selection when elicited in a visual search task, specifically reflecting the selection of a target item among distractors. Moreover, when targets are known in advance, the visual search process is guide...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7990761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776669 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.620413 |
_version_ | 1783669116144451584 |
---|---|
author | Couperus, Jane W. Lydic, Kirsten O. Hollis, Juniper E. Roy, Jessica L. Lowe, Amy R. Bukach, Cindy M. Reed, Catherine L. |
author_facet | Couperus, Jane W. Lydic, Kirsten O. Hollis, Juniper E. Roy, Jessica L. Lowe, Amy R. Bukach, Cindy M. Reed, Catherine L. |
author_sort | Couperus, Jane W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The lateralized ERP N2pc component has been shown to be an effective marker of attentional object selection when elicited in a visual search task, specifically reflecting the selection of a target item among distractors. Moreover, when targets are known in advance, the visual search process is guided by representations of target features held in working memory at the time of search, thus guiding attention to objects with target-matching features. Previous studies have shown that manipulating working memory availability via concurrent tasks or within task manipulations influences visual search performance and the N2pc. Other studies have indicated that visual (non-spatial) vs. spatial working memory manipulations have differential contributions to visual search. To investigate this the current study assesses participants' visual and spatial working memory ability independent of the visual search task to determine whether such individual differences in working memory affect task performance and the N2pc. Participants (n = 205) completed a visual search task to elicit the N2pc and separate visual working memory (VWM) and spatial working memory (SPWM) assessments. Greater SPWM, but not VWM, ability is correlated with and predicts higher visual search accuracy and greater N2pc amplitudes. Neither VWM nor SPWM was related to N2pc latency. These results provide additional support to prior behavioral and neural visual search findings that spatial WM availability, whether as an ability of the participant's processing system or based on task demands, plays an important role in efficient visual search. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7990761 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79907612021-03-26 Individual Differences in Working Memory and the N2pc Couperus, Jane W. Lydic, Kirsten O. Hollis, Juniper E. Roy, Jessica L. Lowe, Amy R. Bukach, Cindy M. Reed, Catherine L. Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience The lateralized ERP N2pc component has been shown to be an effective marker of attentional object selection when elicited in a visual search task, specifically reflecting the selection of a target item among distractors. Moreover, when targets are known in advance, the visual search process is guided by representations of target features held in working memory at the time of search, thus guiding attention to objects with target-matching features. Previous studies have shown that manipulating working memory availability via concurrent tasks or within task manipulations influences visual search performance and the N2pc. Other studies have indicated that visual (non-spatial) vs. spatial working memory manipulations have differential contributions to visual search. To investigate this the current study assesses participants' visual and spatial working memory ability independent of the visual search task to determine whether such individual differences in working memory affect task performance and the N2pc. Participants (n = 205) completed a visual search task to elicit the N2pc and separate visual working memory (VWM) and spatial working memory (SPWM) assessments. Greater SPWM, but not VWM, ability is correlated with and predicts higher visual search accuracy and greater N2pc amplitudes. Neither VWM nor SPWM was related to N2pc latency. These results provide additional support to prior behavioral and neural visual search findings that spatial WM availability, whether as an ability of the participant's processing system or based on task demands, plays an important role in efficient visual search. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7990761/ /pubmed/33776669 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.620413 Text en Copyright © 2021 Couperus, Lydic, Hollis, Roy, Lowe, Bukach and Reed. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Human Neuroscience Couperus, Jane W. Lydic, Kirsten O. Hollis, Juniper E. Roy, Jessica L. Lowe, Amy R. Bukach, Cindy M. Reed, Catherine L. Individual Differences in Working Memory and the N2pc |
title | Individual Differences in Working Memory and the N2pc |
title_full | Individual Differences in Working Memory and the N2pc |
title_fullStr | Individual Differences in Working Memory and the N2pc |
title_full_unstemmed | Individual Differences in Working Memory and the N2pc |
title_short | Individual Differences in Working Memory and the N2pc |
title_sort | individual differences in working memory and the n2pc |
topic | Human Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7990761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776669 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.620413 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT couperusjanew individualdifferencesinworkingmemoryandthen2pc AT lydickirsteno individualdifferencesinworkingmemoryandthen2pc AT hollisjunipere individualdifferencesinworkingmemoryandthen2pc AT royjessical individualdifferencesinworkingmemoryandthen2pc AT loweamyr individualdifferencesinworkingmemoryandthen2pc AT bukachcindym individualdifferencesinworkingmemoryandthen2pc AT reedcatherinel individualdifferencesinworkingmemoryandthen2pc |