Cargando…

Cost–Utility of All-Oral Direct-Acting Antiviral Regimens for the Treatment of Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients in Hong Kong

BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are entering the hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment landscape in Hong Kong, prompting the need for cost–effectiveness evaluations of these interventions to enable optimal use of healthcare resources. AIMS: This study aimed to compare the cost–effectiveness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuen, Man-Fung, Liu, Sze-Hang, Seto, Wai-Kay, Mak, Lung-Yi, Corman, Shelby L., Hsu, Danny C., Lee, Mary Y. K., Khan, Tsz K., Puenpatom, Amy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7990846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32385703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06281-8
_version_ 1783669134371848192
author Yuen, Man-Fung
Liu, Sze-Hang
Seto, Wai-Kay
Mak, Lung-Yi
Corman, Shelby L.
Hsu, Danny C.
Lee, Mary Y. K.
Khan, Tsz K.
Puenpatom, Amy
author_facet Yuen, Man-Fung
Liu, Sze-Hang
Seto, Wai-Kay
Mak, Lung-Yi
Corman, Shelby L.
Hsu, Danny C.
Lee, Mary Y. K.
Khan, Tsz K.
Puenpatom, Amy
author_sort Yuen, Man-Fung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are entering the hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment landscape in Hong Kong, prompting the need for cost–effectiveness evaluations of these interventions to enable optimal use of healthcare resources. AIMS: This study aimed to compare the cost–effectiveness of DAAs to standard-of-care pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (RBV) in treatment-naïve patients without significant liver fibrosis and to compare different DAAs in patients who are treatment-experienced and/or have advanced liver disease. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed to evaluate cost–effectiveness over a lifetime time horizon from the payer perspective. The target population was treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced HCV genotype 1 patients, stratified by degree of liver fibrosis. The model consists of 16 health states encompassing METAVIR fibrosis score (F0–F4), treatment success or failure, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplant, and liver-related death. The proportions of patients achieving sustained virologic response were obtained from clinical trials. Other inputs were obtained from published and local data. The primary outcome was incremental cost–utility ratio for each DAA versus pegylated interferon + ribavirin and among different DAAs. RESULTS: In treatment-naïve F0–2 HCV patients, all DAAs were cost-effective in genotype 1a and daclatasvir + asunaprevir, elbasvir/grazoprevir, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir were cost-effective compared to pegylated interferon + ribavirin in genotype 1b. In genotypes 1a and 1b, treatment-experienced patients, and F3–4 patients, elbasvir/grazoprevir was the least costly DAA and economically dominant over most other DAAs. CONCLUSIONS: DAAs can be a cost-effective option for the treatment of genotype 1 HCV patients in Hong Kong, and elbasvir/grazoprevir is cost-effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7990846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79908462021-04-16 Cost–Utility of All-Oral Direct-Acting Antiviral Regimens for the Treatment of Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients in Hong Kong Yuen, Man-Fung Liu, Sze-Hang Seto, Wai-Kay Mak, Lung-Yi Corman, Shelby L. Hsu, Danny C. Lee, Mary Y. K. Khan, Tsz K. Puenpatom, Amy Dig Dis Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are entering the hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment landscape in Hong Kong, prompting the need for cost–effectiveness evaluations of these interventions to enable optimal use of healthcare resources. AIMS: This study aimed to compare the cost–effectiveness of DAAs to standard-of-care pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (RBV) in treatment-naïve patients without significant liver fibrosis and to compare different DAAs in patients who are treatment-experienced and/or have advanced liver disease. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed to evaluate cost–effectiveness over a lifetime time horizon from the payer perspective. The target population was treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced HCV genotype 1 patients, stratified by degree of liver fibrosis. The model consists of 16 health states encompassing METAVIR fibrosis score (F0–F4), treatment success or failure, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplant, and liver-related death. The proportions of patients achieving sustained virologic response were obtained from clinical trials. Other inputs were obtained from published and local data. The primary outcome was incremental cost–utility ratio for each DAA versus pegylated interferon + ribavirin and among different DAAs. RESULTS: In treatment-naïve F0–2 HCV patients, all DAAs were cost-effective in genotype 1a and daclatasvir + asunaprevir, elbasvir/grazoprevir, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir were cost-effective compared to pegylated interferon + ribavirin in genotype 1b. In genotypes 1a and 1b, treatment-experienced patients, and F3–4 patients, elbasvir/grazoprevir was the least costly DAA and economically dominant over most other DAAs. CONCLUSIONS: DAAs can be a cost-effective option for the treatment of genotype 1 HCV patients in Hong Kong, and elbasvir/grazoprevir is cost-effective. Springer US 2020-05-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7990846/ /pubmed/32385703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06281-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yuen, Man-Fung
Liu, Sze-Hang
Seto, Wai-Kay
Mak, Lung-Yi
Corman, Shelby L.
Hsu, Danny C.
Lee, Mary Y. K.
Khan, Tsz K.
Puenpatom, Amy
Cost–Utility of All-Oral Direct-Acting Antiviral Regimens for the Treatment of Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients in Hong Kong
title Cost–Utility of All-Oral Direct-Acting Antiviral Regimens for the Treatment of Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients in Hong Kong
title_full Cost–Utility of All-Oral Direct-Acting Antiviral Regimens for the Treatment of Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients in Hong Kong
title_fullStr Cost–Utility of All-Oral Direct-Acting Antiviral Regimens for the Treatment of Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients in Hong Kong
title_full_unstemmed Cost–Utility of All-Oral Direct-Acting Antiviral Regimens for the Treatment of Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients in Hong Kong
title_short Cost–Utility of All-Oral Direct-Acting Antiviral Regimens for the Treatment of Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients in Hong Kong
title_sort cost–utility of all-oral direct-acting antiviral regimens for the treatment of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis c virus-infected patients in hong kong
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7990846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32385703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06281-8
work_keys_str_mv AT yuenmanfung costutilityofalloraldirectactingantiviralregimensforthetreatmentofgenotype1chronichepatitiscvirusinfectedpatientsinhongkong
AT liuszehang costutilityofalloraldirectactingantiviralregimensforthetreatmentofgenotype1chronichepatitiscvirusinfectedpatientsinhongkong
AT setowaikay costutilityofalloraldirectactingantiviralregimensforthetreatmentofgenotype1chronichepatitiscvirusinfectedpatientsinhongkong
AT maklungyi costutilityofalloraldirectactingantiviralregimensforthetreatmentofgenotype1chronichepatitiscvirusinfectedpatientsinhongkong
AT cormanshelbyl costutilityofalloraldirectactingantiviralregimensforthetreatmentofgenotype1chronichepatitiscvirusinfectedpatientsinhongkong
AT hsudannyc costutilityofalloraldirectactingantiviralregimensforthetreatmentofgenotype1chronichepatitiscvirusinfectedpatientsinhongkong
AT leemaryyk costutilityofalloraldirectactingantiviralregimensforthetreatmentofgenotype1chronichepatitiscvirusinfectedpatientsinhongkong
AT khantszk costutilityofalloraldirectactingantiviralregimensforthetreatmentofgenotype1chronichepatitiscvirusinfectedpatientsinhongkong
AT puenpatomamy costutilityofalloraldirectactingantiviralregimensforthetreatmentofgenotype1chronichepatitiscvirusinfectedpatientsinhongkong