Cargando…

The Coronary Sinus Reducer; 5-year Dutch experience

BACKGROUND: Refractory angina is a growing and major health-care problem affecting millions of patients with coronary artery disease worldwide. The Coronary Sinus Reducer (CSR) is a device that may be considered for the relief of symptoms of refractory angina. It causes increased venous pressure lea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silvis, M. J. M., Dekker, M., Zivelonghi, C., Agostoni, P., Stella, P. R., Doevendans, P. A., de Kleijn, D. P. V., van Kuijk, J. P., Leenders, G. E., Timmers, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7991026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33284421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01525-8
_version_ 1783669172026212352
author Silvis, M. J. M.
Dekker, M.
Zivelonghi, C.
Agostoni, P.
Stella, P. R.
Doevendans, P. A.
de Kleijn, D. P. V.
van Kuijk, J. P.
Leenders, G. E.
Timmers, L.
author_facet Silvis, M. J. M.
Dekker, M.
Zivelonghi, C.
Agostoni, P.
Stella, P. R.
Doevendans, P. A.
de Kleijn, D. P. V.
van Kuijk, J. P.
Leenders, G. E.
Timmers, L.
author_sort Silvis, M. J. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Refractory angina is a growing and major health-care problem affecting millions of patients with coronary artery disease worldwide. The Coronary Sinus Reducer (CSR) is a device that may be considered for the relief of symptoms of refractory angina. It causes increased venous pressure leading to a dilatation of arterioles and reduced arterial vascular resistance in the sub-endocardium. This study describes the 5‑year Dutch experience regarding safety and efficacy of the CSR. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two patients with refractory angina were treated with the CSR. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class improvement between baseline and 6‑month follow-up. The primary safety endpoint was successful CSR implantation in the absence of any device-related events. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients (67%) showed improvement of at least 1 CCS class and 43 patients (34%) of at least 2 classes. Mean CCS class improved from 3.17 ± 0.61 to 2.12 ± 1.07 after implantation (P < 0.001). The CSR was successfully implanted in 99% of the patients and only minor complications during implantation were reported. CONCLUSION: The CSR is a simple, safe, and effective option for most patients with refractory angina. However, approximately thirty percent of the patients showed no benefit after implantation. Future studies should focus on the exact underlying mechanisms of action and reasons for non-response to better identify patients that could benefit most from this therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-020-01525-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7991026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79910262021-04-16 The Coronary Sinus Reducer; 5-year Dutch experience Silvis, M. J. M. Dekker, M. Zivelonghi, C. Agostoni, P. Stella, P. R. Doevendans, P. A. de Kleijn, D. P. V. van Kuijk, J. P. Leenders, G. E. Timmers, L. Neth Heart J Original Article BACKGROUND: Refractory angina is a growing and major health-care problem affecting millions of patients with coronary artery disease worldwide. The Coronary Sinus Reducer (CSR) is a device that may be considered for the relief of symptoms of refractory angina. It causes increased venous pressure leading to a dilatation of arterioles and reduced arterial vascular resistance in the sub-endocardium. This study describes the 5‑year Dutch experience regarding safety and efficacy of the CSR. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two patients with refractory angina were treated with the CSR. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class improvement between baseline and 6‑month follow-up. The primary safety endpoint was successful CSR implantation in the absence of any device-related events. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients (67%) showed improvement of at least 1 CCS class and 43 patients (34%) of at least 2 classes. Mean CCS class improved from 3.17 ± 0.61 to 2.12 ± 1.07 after implantation (P < 0.001). The CSR was successfully implanted in 99% of the patients and only minor complications during implantation were reported. CONCLUSION: The CSR is a simple, safe, and effective option for most patients with refractory angina. However, approximately thirty percent of the patients showed no benefit after implantation. Future studies should focus on the exact underlying mechanisms of action and reasons for non-response to better identify patients that could benefit most from this therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-020-01525-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2020-12-07 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7991026/ /pubmed/33284421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01525-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Silvis, M. J. M.
Dekker, M.
Zivelonghi, C.
Agostoni, P.
Stella, P. R.
Doevendans, P. A.
de Kleijn, D. P. V.
van Kuijk, J. P.
Leenders, G. E.
Timmers, L.
The Coronary Sinus Reducer; 5-year Dutch experience
title The Coronary Sinus Reducer; 5-year Dutch experience
title_full The Coronary Sinus Reducer; 5-year Dutch experience
title_fullStr The Coronary Sinus Reducer; 5-year Dutch experience
title_full_unstemmed The Coronary Sinus Reducer; 5-year Dutch experience
title_short The Coronary Sinus Reducer; 5-year Dutch experience
title_sort coronary sinus reducer; 5-year dutch experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7991026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33284421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01525-8
work_keys_str_mv AT silvismjm thecoronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience
AT dekkerm thecoronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience
AT zivelonghic thecoronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience
AT agostonip thecoronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience
AT stellapr thecoronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience
AT doevendanspa thecoronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience
AT dekleijndpv thecoronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience
AT vankuijkjp thecoronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience
AT leendersge thecoronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience
AT timmersl thecoronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience
AT silvismjm coronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience
AT dekkerm coronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience
AT zivelonghic coronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience
AT agostonip coronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience
AT stellapr coronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience
AT doevendanspa coronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience
AT dekleijndpv coronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience
AT vankuijkjp coronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience
AT leendersge coronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience
AT timmersl coronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience