Cargando…
The Coronary Sinus Reducer; 5-year Dutch experience
BACKGROUND: Refractory angina is a growing and major health-care problem affecting millions of patients with coronary artery disease worldwide. The Coronary Sinus Reducer (CSR) is a device that may be considered for the relief of symptoms of refractory angina. It causes increased venous pressure lea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7991026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33284421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01525-8 |
_version_ | 1783669172026212352 |
---|---|
author | Silvis, M. J. M. Dekker, M. Zivelonghi, C. Agostoni, P. Stella, P. R. Doevendans, P. A. de Kleijn, D. P. V. van Kuijk, J. P. Leenders, G. E. Timmers, L. |
author_facet | Silvis, M. J. M. Dekker, M. Zivelonghi, C. Agostoni, P. Stella, P. R. Doevendans, P. A. de Kleijn, D. P. V. van Kuijk, J. P. Leenders, G. E. Timmers, L. |
author_sort | Silvis, M. J. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Refractory angina is a growing and major health-care problem affecting millions of patients with coronary artery disease worldwide. The Coronary Sinus Reducer (CSR) is a device that may be considered for the relief of symptoms of refractory angina. It causes increased venous pressure leading to a dilatation of arterioles and reduced arterial vascular resistance in the sub-endocardium. This study describes the 5‑year Dutch experience regarding safety and efficacy of the CSR. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two patients with refractory angina were treated with the CSR. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class improvement between baseline and 6‑month follow-up. The primary safety endpoint was successful CSR implantation in the absence of any device-related events. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients (67%) showed improvement of at least 1 CCS class and 43 patients (34%) of at least 2 classes. Mean CCS class improved from 3.17 ± 0.61 to 2.12 ± 1.07 after implantation (P < 0.001). The CSR was successfully implanted in 99% of the patients and only minor complications during implantation were reported. CONCLUSION: The CSR is a simple, safe, and effective option for most patients with refractory angina. However, approximately thirty percent of the patients showed no benefit after implantation. Future studies should focus on the exact underlying mechanisms of action and reasons for non-response to better identify patients that could benefit most from this therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-020-01525-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7991026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Bohn Stafleu van Loghum |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79910262021-04-16 The Coronary Sinus Reducer; 5-year Dutch experience Silvis, M. J. M. Dekker, M. Zivelonghi, C. Agostoni, P. Stella, P. R. Doevendans, P. A. de Kleijn, D. P. V. van Kuijk, J. P. Leenders, G. E. Timmers, L. Neth Heart J Original Article BACKGROUND: Refractory angina is a growing and major health-care problem affecting millions of patients with coronary artery disease worldwide. The Coronary Sinus Reducer (CSR) is a device that may be considered for the relief of symptoms of refractory angina. It causes increased venous pressure leading to a dilatation of arterioles and reduced arterial vascular resistance in the sub-endocardium. This study describes the 5‑year Dutch experience regarding safety and efficacy of the CSR. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two patients with refractory angina were treated with the CSR. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class improvement between baseline and 6‑month follow-up. The primary safety endpoint was successful CSR implantation in the absence of any device-related events. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients (67%) showed improvement of at least 1 CCS class and 43 patients (34%) of at least 2 classes. Mean CCS class improved from 3.17 ± 0.61 to 2.12 ± 1.07 after implantation (P < 0.001). The CSR was successfully implanted in 99% of the patients and only minor complications during implantation were reported. CONCLUSION: The CSR is a simple, safe, and effective option for most patients with refractory angina. However, approximately thirty percent of the patients showed no benefit after implantation. Future studies should focus on the exact underlying mechanisms of action and reasons for non-response to better identify patients that could benefit most from this therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-020-01525-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2020-12-07 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7991026/ /pubmed/33284421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01525-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Silvis, M. J. M. Dekker, M. Zivelonghi, C. Agostoni, P. Stella, P. R. Doevendans, P. A. de Kleijn, D. P. V. van Kuijk, J. P. Leenders, G. E. Timmers, L. The Coronary Sinus Reducer; 5-year Dutch experience |
title | The Coronary Sinus Reducer; 5-year Dutch experience |
title_full | The Coronary Sinus Reducer; 5-year Dutch experience |
title_fullStr | The Coronary Sinus Reducer; 5-year Dutch experience |
title_full_unstemmed | The Coronary Sinus Reducer; 5-year Dutch experience |
title_short | The Coronary Sinus Reducer; 5-year Dutch experience |
title_sort | coronary sinus reducer; 5-year dutch experience |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7991026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33284421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01525-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silvismjm thecoronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience AT dekkerm thecoronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience AT zivelonghic thecoronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience AT agostonip thecoronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience AT stellapr thecoronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience AT doevendanspa thecoronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience AT dekleijndpv thecoronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience AT vankuijkjp thecoronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience AT leendersge thecoronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience AT timmersl thecoronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience AT silvismjm coronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience AT dekkerm coronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience AT zivelonghic coronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience AT agostonip coronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience AT stellapr coronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience AT doevendanspa coronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience AT dekleijndpv coronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience AT vankuijkjp coronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience AT leendersge coronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience AT timmersl coronarysinusreducer5yeardutchexperience |