Cargando…

How to Define Boolean Low Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Experience from a Large Real-world Cohort

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work is to propose Boolean-defined low disease activity (LDA) and to test its utility in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We used data from a longitudinal academic clinical database of RA in Peking University First Hospital over a decade. The initial proposal of Bool...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Wenhui, Li, Guangtao, Huang, Hong, Zhang, Zhuoli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7991037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33355913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-020-00270-z
_version_ 1783669173969223680
author Xie, Wenhui
Li, Guangtao
Huang, Hong
Zhang, Zhuoli
author_facet Xie, Wenhui
Li, Guangtao
Huang, Hong
Zhang, Zhuoli
author_sort Xie, Wenhui
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work is to propose Boolean-defined low disease activity (LDA) and to test its utility in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We used data from a longitudinal academic clinical database of RA in Peking University First Hospital over a decade. The initial proposal of Boolean-defined LDA was proposed with ascending thresholds from 2 to 5 in steps of 1 (referred to as Boolean-LDA2/3/4/5). Agreement and residual swollen joint count (SJC) pattern with the index-based [Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)] LDA was analyzed. To confirm discovery, we randomly classified RA patients in a 3:2 ratio into either analysis cohort or validation cohort. RESULTS: In total, 4881 visits of 672 patients were included in the analysis cohort. Of these visits, the frequencies of achieving LDA were 71.9% (SDAI), 73.6% (CDAI), 52.8% (Boolean-LDA2), 65.2% (Boolean-LDA3), 73.5% (Boolean-LDA4), and 80.7% (Boolean-LDA5). High consistency and similar SJC pattern with SDAI-LDA or CDAI-LDA were observed in Boolean-LDA3 (kappa = 0.796, 0.771). Further analysis found meeting SDAI-LDA but not Boolean-LDA3 was largely attributable to higher patient’s global assessment (PGA) scores (62.9%). In further modification of Boolean-LDA3, better agreement with SDAI-LDA or CDAI-LDA was reached when exclusively increasing PGA cutoffs to 4.0, 4.5 or replacing PGA by evaluator’s global assessment (EGA) with cutoff to 3.0. These findings were further replicated in randomly generated validation cohort of 449 patients with 3306 clinic visits. CONCLUSIONS: Using cutoff of 3 to Boolean-LDA provides great clinical utility with index-based LDA, especially when exclusively increasing PGA cutoffs to 4.0, 4.5 or replacing PGA by EGA with cutoffs to 3.0. This may deserve being considered in clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-020-00270-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7991037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79910372021-04-16 How to Define Boolean Low Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Experience from a Large Real-world Cohort Xie, Wenhui Li, Guangtao Huang, Hong Zhang, Zhuoli Rheumatol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work is to propose Boolean-defined low disease activity (LDA) and to test its utility in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We used data from a longitudinal academic clinical database of RA in Peking University First Hospital over a decade. The initial proposal of Boolean-defined LDA was proposed with ascending thresholds from 2 to 5 in steps of 1 (referred to as Boolean-LDA2/3/4/5). Agreement and residual swollen joint count (SJC) pattern with the index-based [Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)] LDA was analyzed. To confirm discovery, we randomly classified RA patients in a 3:2 ratio into either analysis cohort or validation cohort. RESULTS: In total, 4881 visits of 672 patients were included in the analysis cohort. Of these visits, the frequencies of achieving LDA were 71.9% (SDAI), 73.6% (CDAI), 52.8% (Boolean-LDA2), 65.2% (Boolean-LDA3), 73.5% (Boolean-LDA4), and 80.7% (Boolean-LDA5). High consistency and similar SJC pattern with SDAI-LDA or CDAI-LDA were observed in Boolean-LDA3 (kappa = 0.796, 0.771). Further analysis found meeting SDAI-LDA but not Boolean-LDA3 was largely attributable to higher patient’s global assessment (PGA) scores (62.9%). In further modification of Boolean-LDA3, better agreement with SDAI-LDA or CDAI-LDA was reached when exclusively increasing PGA cutoffs to 4.0, 4.5 or replacing PGA by evaluator’s global assessment (EGA) with cutoff to 3.0. These findings were further replicated in randomly generated validation cohort of 449 patients with 3306 clinic visits. CONCLUSIONS: Using cutoff of 3 to Boolean-LDA provides great clinical utility with index-based LDA, especially when exclusively increasing PGA cutoffs to 4.0, 4.5 or replacing PGA by EGA with cutoffs to 3.0. This may deserve being considered in clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-020-00270-z. Springer Healthcare 2020-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7991037/ /pubmed/33355913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-020-00270-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Xie, Wenhui
Li, Guangtao
Huang, Hong
Zhang, Zhuoli
How to Define Boolean Low Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Experience from a Large Real-world Cohort
title How to Define Boolean Low Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Experience from a Large Real-world Cohort
title_full How to Define Boolean Low Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Experience from a Large Real-world Cohort
title_fullStr How to Define Boolean Low Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Experience from a Large Real-world Cohort
title_full_unstemmed How to Define Boolean Low Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Experience from a Large Real-world Cohort
title_short How to Define Boolean Low Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Experience from a Large Real-world Cohort
title_sort how to define boolean low disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: experience from a large real-world cohort
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7991037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33355913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-020-00270-z
work_keys_str_mv AT xiewenhui howtodefinebooleanlowdiseaseactivityinrheumatoidarthritisexperiencefromalargerealworldcohort
AT liguangtao howtodefinebooleanlowdiseaseactivityinrheumatoidarthritisexperiencefromalargerealworldcohort
AT huanghong howtodefinebooleanlowdiseaseactivityinrheumatoidarthritisexperiencefromalargerealworldcohort
AT zhangzhuoli howtodefinebooleanlowdiseaseactivityinrheumatoidarthritisexperiencefromalargerealworldcohort