Cargando…
Evaluation of Adherence and Persistence Differences Between Adalimumab Citrate-Free and Citrate Formulations for Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases in the United States
INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to evaluate patient adherence and persistence with citrate-free adalimumab (ADA-CF), introduced in 2018 to reduce injection-site pain, compared with citrate-containing adalimumab (ADA-C). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using a US claims database (IBM(®) Mark...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7991045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33222113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-020-00256-x |
_version_ | 1783669175862951936 |
---|---|
author | Bergman, Martin Patel, Pankaj Chen, Naijun Jing, Yonghua Saffore, Christopher D. |
author_facet | Bergman, Martin Patel, Pankaj Chen, Naijun Jing, Yonghua Saffore, Christopher D. |
author_sort | Bergman, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to evaluate patient adherence and persistence with citrate-free adalimumab (ADA-CF), introduced in 2018 to reduce injection-site pain, compared with citrate-containing adalimumab (ADA-C). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using a US claims database (IBM(®) MarketScan(®) Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Claims Database) from February 2018 to January 2020. Patients at least 18 years of age who were naïve to adalimumab 6 months before the index date (date of first adalimumab claim) and with at least 12 months of continuous medical and pharmacy coverage were eligible for the study. Adherence was assessed by determining the proportion of days covered (PDC) and the percentage of patients with PDC ≥ 80% during the 12-month follow-up period. Persistence was evaluated by measuring the rate of discontinuation and days to discontinuation (i.e., time on treatment) from the index date over the 12-month follow-up period. Continuous adherence outcomes (PDC) were evaluated using linear regression models. Binary adherence outcomes (PDC ≥ 80%) were assessed using logistic regression models. Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess persistence outcomes. RESULTS: There were 2195 and 1005 patients in the ADA-CF and ADA-C cohorts, respectively, with most using adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis (ADA-CF 29.7%, ADA-C 27.2%) and psoriasis (ADA-CF 24.5%, ADA-C 31.9%). Significantly greater adherence was achieved with ADA-CF compared with ADA-C (mean PDC [standard deviation] 0.68 [0.30] vs 0.61 [0.32], P < 0.0001). A significantly greater percentage of patients receiving ADA-CF (47.2%) vs ADA-C (39.6%) had PDC ≥ 80% (P < 0.0001). The discontinuation rate was significantly lower for the ADA-CF cohort (46.4%) compared with ADA-C (55.9%, P < 0.0001), resulting in a 27% lower likelihood of discontinuation during the 12-month follow-up period (hazard ratio 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.66, 0.82; P < 0.0001) and longer time on treatment (260 vs 232 days, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Adherence and persistence are significantly improved with ADA-CF compared with ADA-C. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-020-00256-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7991045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79910452021-04-16 Evaluation of Adherence and Persistence Differences Between Adalimumab Citrate-Free and Citrate Formulations for Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases in the United States Bergman, Martin Patel, Pankaj Chen, Naijun Jing, Yonghua Saffore, Christopher D. Rheumatol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to evaluate patient adherence and persistence with citrate-free adalimumab (ADA-CF), introduced in 2018 to reduce injection-site pain, compared with citrate-containing adalimumab (ADA-C). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using a US claims database (IBM(®) MarketScan(®) Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Claims Database) from February 2018 to January 2020. Patients at least 18 years of age who were naïve to adalimumab 6 months before the index date (date of first adalimumab claim) and with at least 12 months of continuous medical and pharmacy coverage were eligible for the study. Adherence was assessed by determining the proportion of days covered (PDC) and the percentage of patients with PDC ≥ 80% during the 12-month follow-up period. Persistence was evaluated by measuring the rate of discontinuation and days to discontinuation (i.e., time on treatment) from the index date over the 12-month follow-up period. Continuous adherence outcomes (PDC) were evaluated using linear regression models. Binary adherence outcomes (PDC ≥ 80%) were assessed using logistic regression models. Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess persistence outcomes. RESULTS: There were 2195 and 1005 patients in the ADA-CF and ADA-C cohorts, respectively, with most using adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis (ADA-CF 29.7%, ADA-C 27.2%) and psoriasis (ADA-CF 24.5%, ADA-C 31.9%). Significantly greater adherence was achieved with ADA-CF compared with ADA-C (mean PDC [standard deviation] 0.68 [0.30] vs 0.61 [0.32], P < 0.0001). A significantly greater percentage of patients receiving ADA-CF (47.2%) vs ADA-C (39.6%) had PDC ≥ 80% (P < 0.0001). The discontinuation rate was significantly lower for the ADA-CF cohort (46.4%) compared with ADA-C (55.9%, P < 0.0001), resulting in a 27% lower likelihood of discontinuation during the 12-month follow-up period (hazard ratio 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.66, 0.82; P < 0.0001) and longer time on treatment (260 vs 232 days, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Adherence and persistence are significantly improved with ADA-CF compared with ADA-C. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-020-00256-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2020-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7991045/ /pubmed/33222113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-020-00256-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bergman, Martin Patel, Pankaj Chen, Naijun Jing, Yonghua Saffore, Christopher D. Evaluation of Adherence and Persistence Differences Between Adalimumab Citrate-Free and Citrate Formulations for Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases in the United States |
title | Evaluation of Adherence and Persistence Differences Between Adalimumab Citrate-Free and Citrate Formulations for Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases in the United States |
title_full | Evaluation of Adherence and Persistence Differences Between Adalimumab Citrate-Free and Citrate Formulations for Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases in the United States |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Adherence and Persistence Differences Between Adalimumab Citrate-Free and Citrate Formulations for Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Adherence and Persistence Differences Between Adalimumab Citrate-Free and Citrate Formulations for Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases in the United States |
title_short | Evaluation of Adherence and Persistence Differences Between Adalimumab Citrate-Free and Citrate Formulations for Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases in the United States |
title_sort | evaluation of adherence and persistence differences between adalimumab citrate-free and citrate formulations for patients with immune-mediated diseases in the united states |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7991045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33222113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-020-00256-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bergmanmartin evaluationofadherenceandpersistencedifferencesbetweenadalimumabcitratefreeandcitrateformulationsforpatientswithimmunemediateddiseasesintheunitedstates AT patelpankaj evaluationofadherenceandpersistencedifferencesbetweenadalimumabcitratefreeandcitrateformulationsforpatientswithimmunemediateddiseasesintheunitedstates AT chennaijun evaluationofadherenceandpersistencedifferencesbetweenadalimumabcitratefreeandcitrateformulationsforpatientswithimmunemediateddiseasesintheunitedstates AT jingyonghua evaluationofadherenceandpersistencedifferencesbetweenadalimumabcitratefreeandcitrateformulationsforpatientswithimmunemediateddiseasesintheunitedstates AT safforechristopherd evaluationofadherenceandpersistencedifferencesbetweenadalimumabcitratefreeandcitrateformulationsforpatientswithimmunemediateddiseasesintheunitedstates |