Cargando…

Carotid Stump Pressure and Contralateral Internal Carotid Stenosis Ratio During Carotid Endarterectomies: 1D-0D Hemodynamic Simulation of Cerebral Perfusion

Objective: We selectively place carotid shunting when ipsilateral mean stump pressure is less than 40 mmHg during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This study aimed to assess the validity of our selective shunting criterion by 1D-0D hemodynamic simulation technology. Materials and Methods: We retrospect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsuura, Sohei, Takayama, Toshio, Yuhn, Changyoung, Oshima, Marie, Shirasu, Takuro, Akai, Takafumi, Isaji, Toshihiko, Hoshina, Katsuyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7991701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33786098
http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.20-00166
_version_ 1783669222873759744
author Matsuura, Sohei
Takayama, Toshio
Yuhn, Changyoung
Oshima, Marie
Shirasu, Takuro
Akai, Takafumi
Isaji, Toshihiko
Hoshina, Katsuyuki
author_facet Matsuura, Sohei
Takayama, Toshio
Yuhn, Changyoung
Oshima, Marie
Shirasu, Takuro
Akai, Takafumi
Isaji, Toshihiko
Hoshina, Katsuyuki
author_sort Matsuura, Sohei
collection PubMed
description Objective: We selectively place carotid shunting when ipsilateral mean stump pressure is less than 40 mmHg during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This study aimed to assess the validity of our selective shunting criterion by 1D-0D hemodynamic simulation technology. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 88 patients (95 cases) of CEA and divided them into two groups based on the degree of contralateral internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis ratio, which was determined as severe when the peak systolic velocity ratio of the ICA to the common carotid artery was ≥4 by carotid duplex ultrasonography. Patients with severe stenosis or occlusion in contralateral ICA were classified as hypoperfusion group, and those without such contralateral ICA obstruction were classified as control group. Results: Perioperatively, the mean carotid stump pressures were 33 mmHg in hypoperfusion group and 46 mmHg in the control group (P=0.006). We simulated changes in carotid stump pressure according to the changes in the contralateral ICA stenosis ratio. 1D-0D simulation indicated a sharp decline in carotid stump pressure when the contralateral stenosis ratio was >50%, while peripheral pressure of the middle cerebral arteries declined sharply at a ≥70% contralateral stenosis ratio. At this ratio, the direction of the ipsilateral cerebral arterial flow became inverted, the carotid stump pressure became dependent on the basilar artery circulation, and the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery became hypoperfused. Conclusion: Our clinical and computer-simulated results confirmed the validation of our carotid shunting criterion and suggested that contralateral ICA stenosis ratio over 70% is a safe indication of selective shunting during CEA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7991701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79917012021-03-29 Carotid Stump Pressure and Contralateral Internal Carotid Stenosis Ratio During Carotid Endarterectomies: 1D-0D Hemodynamic Simulation of Cerebral Perfusion Matsuura, Sohei Takayama, Toshio Yuhn, Changyoung Oshima, Marie Shirasu, Takuro Akai, Takafumi Isaji, Toshihiko Hoshina, Katsuyuki Ann Vasc Dis Original Article Objective: We selectively place carotid shunting when ipsilateral mean stump pressure is less than 40 mmHg during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This study aimed to assess the validity of our selective shunting criterion by 1D-0D hemodynamic simulation technology. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 88 patients (95 cases) of CEA and divided them into two groups based on the degree of contralateral internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis ratio, which was determined as severe when the peak systolic velocity ratio of the ICA to the common carotid artery was ≥4 by carotid duplex ultrasonography. Patients with severe stenosis or occlusion in contralateral ICA were classified as hypoperfusion group, and those without such contralateral ICA obstruction were classified as control group. Results: Perioperatively, the mean carotid stump pressures were 33 mmHg in hypoperfusion group and 46 mmHg in the control group (P=0.006). We simulated changes in carotid stump pressure according to the changes in the contralateral ICA stenosis ratio. 1D-0D simulation indicated a sharp decline in carotid stump pressure when the contralateral stenosis ratio was >50%, while peripheral pressure of the middle cerebral arteries declined sharply at a ≥70% contralateral stenosis ratio. At this ratio, the direction of the ipsilateral cerebral arterial flow became inverted, the carotid stump pressure became dependent on the basilar artery circulation, and the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery became hypoperfused. Conclusion: Our clinical and computer-simulated results confirmed the validation of our carotid shunting criterion and suggested that contralateral ICA stenosis ratio over 70% is a safe indication of selective shunting during CEA. Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology 2021-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7991701/ /pubmed/33786098 http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.20-00166 Text en © 2021 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the credit of the original work, a link to the license, and indication of any change are properly given, and the original work is not used for commercial purposes. Remixed or transformed contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original.
spellingShingle Original Article
Matsuura, Sohei
Takayama, Toshio
Yuhn, Changyoung
Oshima, Marie
Shirasu, Takuro
Akai, Takafumi
Isaji, Toshihiko
Hoshina, Katsuyuki
Carotid Stump Pressure and Contralateral Internal Carotid Stenosis Ratio During Carotid Endarterectomies: 1D-0D Hemodynamic Simulation of Cerebral Perfusion
title Carotid Stump Pressure and Contralateral Internal Carotid Stenosis Ratio During Carotid Endarterectomies: 1D-0D Hemodynamic Simulation of Cerebral Perfusion
title_full Carotid Stump Pressure and Contralateral Internal Carotid Stenosis Ratio During Carotid Endarterectomies: 1D-0D Hemodynamic Simulation of Cerebral Perfusion
title_fullStr Carotid Stump Pressure and Contralateral Internal Carotid Stenosis Ratio During Carotid Endarterectomies: 1D-0D Hemodynamic Simulation of Cerebral Perfusion
title_full_unstemmed Carotid Stump Pressure and Contralateral Internal Carotid Stenosis Ratio During Carotid Endarterectomies: 1D-0D Hemodynamic Simulation of Cerebral Perfusion
title_short Carotid Stump Pressure and Contralateral Internal Carotid Stenosis Ratio During Carotid Endarterectomies: 1D-0D Hemodynamic Simulation of Cerebral Perfusion
title_sort carotid stump pressure and contralateral internal carotid stenosis ratio during carotid endarterectomies: 1d-0d hemodynamic simulation of cerebral perfusion
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7991701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33786098
http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.20-00166
work_keys_str_mv AT matsuurasohei carotidstumppressureandcontralateralinternalcarotidstenosisratioduringcarotidendarterectomies1d0dhemodynamicsimulationofcerebralperfusion
AT takayamatoshio carotidstumppressureandcontralateralinternalcarotidstenosisratioduringcarotidendarterectomies1d0dhemodynamicsimulationofcerebralperfusion
AT yuhnchangyoung carotidstumppressureandcontralateralinternalcarotidstenosisratioduringcarotidendarterectomies1d0dhemodynamicsimulationofcerebralperfusion
AT oshimamarie carotidstumppressureandcontralateralinternalcarotidstenosisratioduringcarotidendarterectomies1d0dhemodynamicsimulationofcerebralperfusion
AT shirasutakuro carotidstumppressureandcontralateralinternalcarotidstenosisratioduringcarotidendarterectomies1d0dhemodynamicsimulationofcerebralperfusion
AT akaitakafumi carotidstumppressureandcontralateralinternalcarotidstenosisratioduringcarotidendarterectomies1d0dhemodynamicsimulationofcerebralperfusion
AT isajitoshihiko carotidstumppressureandcontralateralinternalcarotidstenosisratioduringcarotidendarterectomies1d0dhemodynamicsimulationofcerebralperfusion
AT hoshinakatsuyuki carotidstumppressureandcontralateralinternalcarotidstenosisratioduringcarotidendarterectomies1d0dhemodynamicsimulationofcerebralperfusion