Cargando…

Using Machine Learning Technologies in Pressure Injury Management: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Pressure injury (PI) is a common and preventable problem, yet it is a challenge for at least two reasons. First, the nurse shortage is a worldwide phenomenon. Second, the majority of nurses have insufficient PI-related knowledge. Machine learning (ML) technologies can contribute to lesse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Mengyao, Ma, Yuxia, Guo, Siyi, Jin, Liuqi, Lv, Lin, Han, Lin, An, Ning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7991995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33688846
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25704
_version_ 1783669288650932224
author Jiang, Mengyao
Ma, Yuxia
Guo, Siyi
Jin, Liuqi
Lv, Lin
Han, Lin
An, Ning
author_facet Jiang, Mengyao
Ma, Yuxia
Guo, Siyi
Jin, Liuqi
Lv, Lin
Han, Lin
An, Ning
author_sort Jiang, Mengyao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pressure injury (PI) is a common and preventable problem, yet it is a challenge for at least two reasons. First, the nurse shortage is a worldwide phenomenon. Second, the majority of nurses have insufficient PI-related knowledge. Machine learning (ML) technologies can contribute to lessening the burden on medical staff by improving the prognosis and diagnostic accuracy of PI. To the best of our knowledge, there is no existing systematic review that evaluates how the current ML technologies are being used in PI management. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to synthesize and evaluate the literature regarding the use of ML technologies in PI management, and identify their strengths and weaknesses, as well as to identify improvement opportunities for future research and practice. METHODS: We conducted an extensive search on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), the Wanfang database, the VIP database, and the China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) to identify relevant articles. Searches were performed in June 2020. Two independent investigators conducted study selection, data extraction, and quality appraisal. Risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST). RESULTS: A total of 32 articles met the inclusion criteria. Twelve of those articles (38%) reported using ML technologies to develop predictive models to identify risk factors, 11 (34%) reported using them in posture detection and recognition, and 9 (28%) reported using them in image analysis for tissue classification and measurement of PI wounds. These articles presented various algorithms and measured outcomes. The overall risk of bias was judged as high. CONCLUSIONS: There is an array of emerging ML technologies being used in PI management, and their results in the laboratory show great promise. Future research should apply these technologies on a large scale with clinical data to further verify and improve their effectiveness, as well as to improve the methodological quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7991995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79919952021-04-01 Using Machine Learning Technologies in Pressure Injury Management: Systematic Review Jiang, Mengyao Ma, Yuxia Guo, Siyi Jin, Liuqi Lv, Lin Han, Lin An, Ning JMIR Med Inform Review BACKGROUND: Pressure injury (PI) is a common and preventable problem, yet it is a challenge for at least two reasons. First, the nurse shortage is a worldwide phenomenon. Second, the majority of nurses have insufficient PI-related knowledge. Machine learning (ML) technologies can contribute to lessening the burden on medical staff by improving the prognosis and diagnostic accuracy of PI. To the best of our knowledge, there is no existing systematic review that evaluates how the current ML technologies are being used in PI management. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to synthesize and evaluate the literature regarding the use of ML technologies in PI management, and identify their strengths and weaknesses, as well as to identify improvement opportunities for future research and practice. METHODS: We conducted an extensive search on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), the Wanfang database, the VIP database, and the China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) to identify relevant articles. Searches were performed in June 2020. Two independent investigators conducted study selection, data extraction, and quality appraisal. Risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST). RESULTS: A total of 32 articles met the inclusion criteria. Twelve of those articles (38%) reported using ML technologies to develop predictive models to identify risk factors, 11 (34%) reported using them in posture detection and recognition, and 9 (28%) reported using them in image analysis for tissue classification and measurement of PI wounds. These articles presented various algorithms and measured outcomes. The overall risk of bias was judged as high. CONCLUSIONS: There is an array of emerging ML technologies being used in PI management, and their results in the laboratory show great promise. Future research should apply these technologies on a large scale with clinical data to further verify and improve their effectiveness, as well as to improve the methodological quality. JMIR Publications 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7991995/ /pubmed/33688846 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25704 Text en ©Mengyao Jiang, Yuxia Ma, Siyi Guo, Liuqi Jin, Lin Lv, Lin Han, Ning An. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (http://medinform.jmir.org), 10.03.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Informatics, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://medinform.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Jiang, Mengyao
Ma, Yuxia
Guo, Siyi
Jin, Liuqi
Lv, Lin
Han, Lin
An, Ning
Using Machine Learning Technologies in Pressure Injury Management: Systematic Review
title Using Machine Learning Technologies in Pressure Injury Management: Systematic Review
title_full Using Machine Learning Technologies in Pressure Injury Management: Systematic Review
title_fullStr Using Machine Learning Technologies in Pressure Injury Management: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Using Machine Learning Technologies in Pressure Injury Management: Systematic Review
title_short Using Machine Learning Technologies in Pressure Injury Management: Systematic Review
title_sort using machine learning technologies in pressure injury management: systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7991995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33688846
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25704
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangmengyao usingmachinelearningtechnologiesinpressureinjurymanagementsystematicreview
AT mayuxia usingmachinelearningtechnologiesinpressureinjurymanagementsystematicreview
AT guosiyi usingmachinelearningtechnologiesinpressureinjurymanagementsystematicreview
AT jinliuqi usingmachinelearningtechnologiesinpressureinjurymanagementsystematicreview
AT lvlin usingmachinelearningtechnologiesinpressureinjurymanagementsystematicreview
AT hanlin usingmachinelearningtechnologiesinpressureinjurymanagementsystematicreview
AT anning usingmachinelearningtechnologiesinpressureinjurymanagementsystematicreview