Cargando…
Role of Catalyst in Optimizing Fluid Catalytic Cracking Performance During Cracking of H-Oil-Derived Gas Oils
[Image: see text] Three H-Oil gas oils, heavy atmospheric gas oil (HAGO), light vacuum gas oil (LVGO), heavy vacuum gas oil (HVGO), and two their blends with hydrotreated straight run vacuum gas oils (HTSRVGOs) were cracked on two high unit cell size (UCS) lower porosity commercial catalysts and two...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7992162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33778273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c06207 |
_version_ | 1783669317271814144 |
---|---|
author | Stratiev, Dicho Shishkova, Ivelina Ivanov, Mihail Dinkov, Rosen Georgiev, Borislav Argirov, Georgi Atanassova, Vassia Vassilev, Petar Atanassov, Krassimir Yordanov, Dobromir Popov, Aleksey Padovani, Alessia Hartmann, Ulrike Brandt, Stefan Nenov, Svetoslav Sotirov, Sotir Sotirova, Evdokia |
author_facet | Stratiev, Dicho Shishkova, Ivelina Ivanov, Mihail Dinkov, Rosen Georgiev, Borislav Argirov, Georgi Atanassova, Vassia Vassilev, Petar Atanassov, Krassimir Yordanov, Dobromir Popov, Aleksey Padovani, Alessia Hartmann, Ulrike Brandt, Stefan Nenov, Svetoslav Sotirov, Sotir Sotirova, Evdokia |
author_sort | Stratiev, Dicho |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Three H-Oil gas oils, heavy atmospheric gas oil (HAGO), light vacuum gas oil (LVGO), heavy vacuum gas oil (HVGO), and two their blends with hydrotreated straight run vacuum gas oils (HTSRVGOs) were cracked on two high unit cell size (UCS) lower porosity commercial catalysts and two low UCS higher porosity commercial catalysts. The cracking experiments were performed in an advanced cracking evaluation fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) laboratory unit at 527 °C, 30 s catalyst time on stream, and catalyst-to-oil (CTO) variation between 3.5 and 7.5 wt/wt The two high UCS lower porosity catalysts were more active and more coke selective. However, the difference between conversion of the more active high UCS lower porosity and low UCS higher porosity catalysts at 7.5 wt/wt CTO decreased in the order 10% (HAGO) > 9% (LVGO) > 6% (HVGO) > 4% (80% HTSRVGO/20% H-Oil VGO). Therefore, the catalyst performance is feedstock-dependent. The four studied catalysts along with a blend of one of them with 2% ZSM-5 were examined in a commercially revamped UOP FCC VSS unit. The lower UCS higher porosity catalysts exhibited operation at a higher CTO ratio achieving a similar conversion level with more active higher UCS lower porosity catalysts. However, the higher UCS lower porosity catalysts made 0.67% Δ coke that was higher than the maximum acceptable limit of 0.64% for this particular commercial FCC unit (FCCU), which required excluding the HVGO from the FCC feed blend. The catalyst system containing ZSM-5 increased the LPG yield but did not have an impact on gasoline octane. It was found that the predominant factor that controls refinery profitability related to the FCCU performance is the FCC slurry oil (bottoms) yield. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7992162 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79921622021-03-26 Role of Catalyst in Optimizing Fluid Catalytic Cracking Performance During Cracking of H-Oil-Derived Gas Oils Stratiev, Dicho Shishkova, Ivelina Ivanov, Mihail Dinkov, Rosen Georgiev, Borislav Argirov, Georgi Atanassova, Vassia Vassilev, Petar Atanassov, Krassimir Yordanov, Dobromir Popov, Aleksey Padovani, Alessia Hartmann, Ulrike Brandt, Stefan Nenov, Svetoslav Sotirov, Sotir Sotirova, Evdokia ACS Omega [Image: see text] Three H-Oil gas oils, heavy atmospheric gas oil (HAGO), light vacuum gas oil (LVGO), heavy vacuum gas oil (HVGO), and two their blends with hydrotreated straight run vacuum gas oils (HTSRVGOs) were cracked on two high unit cell size (UCS) lower porosity commercial catalysts and two low UCS higher porosity commercial catalysts. The cracking experiments were performed in an advanced cracking evaluation fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) laboratory unit at 527 °C, 30 s catalyst time on stream, and catalyst-to-oil (CTO) variation between 3.5 and 7.5 wt/wt The two high UCS lower porosity catalysts were more active and more coke selective. However, the difference between conversion of the more active high UCS lower porosity and low UCS higher porosity catalysts at 7.5 wt/wt CTO decreased in the order 10% (HAGO) > 9% (LVGO) > 6% (HVGO) > 4% (80% HTSRVGO/20% H-Oil VGO). Therefore, the catalyst performance is feedstock-dependent. The four studied catalysts along with a blend of one of them with 2% ZSM-5 were examined in a commercially revamped UOP FCC VSS unit. The lower UCS higher porosity catalysts exhibited operation at a higher CTO ratio achieving a similar conversion level with more active higher UCS lower porosity catalysts. However, the higher UCS lower porosity catalysts made 0.67% Δ coke that was higher than the maximum acceptable limit of 0.64% for this particular commercial FCC unit (FCCU), which required excluding the HVGO from the FCC feed blend. The catalyst system containing ZSM-5 increased the LPG yield but did not have an impact on gasoline octane. It was found that the predominant factor that controls refinery profitability related to the FCCU performance is the FCC slurry oil (bottoms) yield. American Chemical Society 2021-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7992162/ /pubmed/33778273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c06207 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Stratiev, Dicho Shishkova, Ivelina Ivanov, Mihail Dinkov, Rosen Georgiev, Borislav Argirov, Georgi Atanassova, Vassia Vassilev, Petar Atanassov, Krassimir Yordanov, Dobromir Popov, Aleksey Padovani, Alessia Hartmann, Ulrike Brandt, Stefan Nenov, Svetoslav Sotirov, Sotir Sotirova, Evdokia Role of Catalyst in Optimizing Fluid Catalytic Cracking Performance During Cracking of H-Oil-Derived Gas Oils |
title | Role of Catalyst in Optimizing Fluid Catalytic Cracking
Performance During Cracking of H-Oil-Derived Gas Oils |
title_full | Role of Catalyst in Optimizing Fluid Catalytic Cracking
Performance During Cracking of H-Oil-Derived Gas Oils |
title_fullStr | Role of Catalyst in Optimizing Fluid Catalytic Cracking
Performance During Cracking of H-Oil-Derived Gas Oils |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of Catalyst in Optimizing Fluid Catalytic Cracking
Performance During Cracking of H-Oil-Derived Gas Oils |
title_short | Role of Catalyst in Optimizing Fluid Catalytic Cracking
Performance During Cracking of H-Oil-Derived Gas Oils |
title_sort | role of catalyst in optimizing fluid catalytic cracking
performance during cracking of h-oil-derived gas oils |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7992162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33778273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c06207 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stratievdicho roleofcatalystinoptimizingfluidcatalyticcrackingperformanceduringcrackingofhoilderivedgasoils AT shishkovaivelina roleofcatalystinoptimizingfluidcatalyticcrackingperformanceduringcrackingofhoilderivedgasoils AT ivanovmihail roleofcatalystinoptimizingfluidcatalyticcrackingperformanceduringcrackingofhoilderivedgasoils AT dinkovrosen roleofcatalystinoptimizingfluidcatalyticcrackingperformanceduringcrackingofhoilderivedgasoils AT georgievborislav roleofcatalystinoptimizingfluidcatalyticcrackingperformanceduringcrackingofhoilderivedgasoils AT argirovgeorgi roleofcatalystinoptimizingfluidcatalyticcrackingperformanceduringcrackingofhoilderivedgasoils AT atanassovavassia roleofcatalystinoptimizingfluidcatalyticcrackingperformanceduringcrackingofhoilderivedgasoils AT vassilevpetar roleofcatalystinoptimizingfluidcatalyticcrackingperformanceduringcrackingofhoilderivedgasoils AT atanassovkrassimir roleofcatalystinoptimizingfluidcatalyticcrackingperformanceduringcrackingofhoilderivedgasoils AT yordanovdobromir roleofcatalystinoptimizingfluidcatalyticcrackingperformanceduringcrackingofhoilderivedgasoils AT popovaleksey roleofcatalystinoptimizingfluidcatalyticcrackingperformanceduringcrackingofhoilderivedgasoils AT padovanialessia roleofcatalystinoptimizingfluidcatalyticcrackingperformanceduringcrackingofhoilderivedgasoils AT hartmannulrike roleofcatalystinoptimizingfluidcatalyticcrackingperformanceduringcrackingofhoilderivedgasoils AT brandtstefan roleofcatalystinoptimizingfluidcatalyticcrackingperformanceduringcrackingofhoilderivedgasoils AT nenovsvetoslav roleofcatalystinoptimizingfluidcatalyticcrackingperformanceduringcrackingofhoilderivedgasoils AT sotirovsotir roleofcatalystinoptimizingfluidcatalyticcrackingperformanceduringcrackingofhoilderivedgasoils AT sotirovaevdokia roleofcatalystinoptimizingfluidcatalyticcrackingperformanceduringcrackingofhoilderivedgasoils |