Cargando…
Comparing CT scan and chest X-ray imaging for COVID-19 diagnosis
People suspected of having COVID-19 need to know quickly if they are infected, so they can receive appropriate treatment, self-isolate, and inform those with whom they have been in close contact. Currently, the formal diagnosis of COVID-19 requires a laboratory test (RT-PCR) on samples taken from th...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7992299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34786568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bea.2021.100003 |
_version_ | 1783669345472217088 |
---|---|
author | Benmalek, Elmehdi Elmhamdi, Jamal Jilbab, Abdelilah |
author_facet | Benmalek, Elmehdi Elmhamdi, Jamal Jilbab, Abdelilah |
author_sort | Benmalek, Elmehdi |
collection | PubMed |
description | People suspected of having COVID-19 need to know quickly if they are infected, so they can receive appropriate treatment, self-isolate, and inform those with whom they have been in close contact. Currently, the formal diagnosis of COVID-19 requires a laboratory test (RT-PCR) on samples taken from the nose and throat. The RT-PCR test requires specialized equipment and takes at least 24 h to produce a result. Chest imaging has demonstrated its valuable role in the development of this lung disease. Fast and accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 is possible with the chest X-ray (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) scan images. Our manuscript aims to compare the performances of chest imaging techniques in the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection using different convolutional neural networks (CNN). To do so, we have tested Resnet-18, InceptionV3, and MobileNetV2, for CT scan and CXR images. We found that the ResNet-18 has the best overall precision and sensitivity of 98.5% and 98.6%, respectively, the InceptionV3 model has achieved the best overall specificity of 97.4%, and the MobileNetV2 has obtained a perfect sensitivity for COVID-19 cases. All these performances have occurred with CT scan images. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7992299 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79922992021-03-26 Comparing CT scan and chest X-ray imaging for COVID-19 diagnosis Benmalek, Elmehdi Elmhamdi, Jamal Jilbab, Abdelilah Biomedical Engineering Advances Article People suspected of having COVID-19 need to know quickly if they are infected, so they can receive appropriate treatment, self-isolate, and inform those with whom they have been in close contact. Currently, the formal diagnosis of COVID-19 requires a laboratory test (RT-PCR) on samples taken from the nose and throat. The RT-PCR test requires specialized equipment and takes at least 24 h to produce a result. Chest imaging has demonstrated its valuable role in the development of this lung disease. Fast and accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 is possible with the chest X-ray (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) scan images. Our manuscript aims to compare the performances of chest imaging techniques in the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection using different convolutional neural networks (CNN). To do so, we have tested Resnet-18, InceptionV3, and MobileNetV2, for CT scan and CXR images. We found that the ResNet-18 has the best overall precision and sensitivity of 98.5% and 98.6%, respectively, the InceptionV3 model has achieved the best overall specificity of 97.4%, and the MobileNetV2 has obtained a perfect sensitivity for COVID-19 cases. All these performances have occurred with CT scan images. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021-06 2021-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7992299/ /pubmed/34786568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bea.2021.100003 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Benmalek, Elmehdi Elmhamdi, Jamal Jilbab, Abdelilah Comparing CT scan and chest X-ray imaging for COVID-19 diagnosis |
title | Comparing CT scan and chest X-ray imaging for COVID-19 diagnosis |
title_full | Comparing CT scan and chest X-ray imaging for COVID-19 diagnosis |
title_fullStr | Comparing CT scan and chest X-ray imaging for COVID-19 diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing CT scan and chest X-ray imaging for COVID-19 diagnosis |
title_short | Comparing CT scan and chest X-ray imaging for COVID-19 diagnosis |
title_sort | comparing ct scan and chest x-ray imaging for covid-19 diagnosis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7992299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34786568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bea.2021.100003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benmalekelmehdi comparingctscanandchestxrayimagingforcovid19diagnosis AT elmhamdijamal comparingctscanandchestxrayimagingforcovid19diagnosis AT jilbababdelilah comparingctscanandchestxrayimagingforcovid19diagnosis |