Cargando…

Comparing CT scan and chest X-ray imaging for COVID-19 diagnosis

People suspected of having COVID-19 need to know quickly if they are infected, so they can receive appropriate treatment, self-isolate, and inform those with whom they have been in close contact. Currently, the formal diagnosis of COVID-19 requires a laboratory test (RT-PCR) on samples taken from th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benmalek, Elmehdi, Elmhamdi, Jamal, Jilbab, Abdelilah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7992299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34786568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bea.2021.100003
_version_ 1783669345472217088
author Benmalek, Elmehdi
Elmhamdi, Jamal
Jilbab, Abdelilah
author_facet Benmalek, Elmehdi
Elmhamdi, Jamal
Jilbab, Abdelilah
author_sort Benmalek, Elmehdi
collection PubMed
description People suspected of having COVID-19 need to know quickly if they are infected, so they can receive appropriate treatment, self-isolate, and inform those with whom they have been in close contact. Currently, the formal diagnosis of COVID-19 requires a laboratory test (RT-PCR) on samples taken from the nose and throat. The RT-PCR test requires specialized equipment and takes at least 24 h to produce a result. Chest imaging has demonstrated its valuable role in the development of this lung disease. Fast and accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 is possible with the chest X-ray (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) scan images. Our manuscript aims to compare the performances of chest imaging techniques in the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection using different convolutional neural networks (CNN). To do so, we have tested Resnet-18, InceptionV3, and MobileNetV2, for CT scan and CXR images. We found that the ResNet-18 has the best overall precision and sensitivity of 98.5% and 98.6%, respectively, the InceptionV3 model has achieved the best overall specificity of 97.4%, and the MobileNetV2 has obtained a perfect sensitivity for COVID-19 cases. All these performances have occurred with CT scan images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7992299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79922992021-03-26 Comparing CT scan and chest X-ray imaging for COVID-19 diagnosis Benmalek, Elmehdi Elmhamdi, Jamal Jilbab, Abdelilah Biomedical Engineering Advances Article People suspected of having COVID-19 need to know quickly if they are infected, so they can receive appropriate treatment, self-isolate, and inform those with whom they have been in close contact. Currently, the formal diagnosis of COVID-19 requires a laboratory test (RT-PCR) on samples taken from the nose and throat. The RT-PCR test requires specialized equipment and takes at least 24 h to produce a result. Chest imaging has demonstrated its valuable role in the development of this lung disease. Fast and accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 is possible with the chest X-ray (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) scan images. Our manuscript aims to compare the performances of chest imaging techniques in the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection using different convolutional neural networks (CNN). To do so, we have tested Resnet-18, InceptionV3, and MobileNetV2, for CT scan and CXR images. We found that the ResNet-18 has the best overall precision and sensitivity of 98.5% and 98.6%, respectively, the InceptionV3 model has achieved the best overall specificity of 97.4%, and the MobileNetV2 has obtained a perfect sensitivity for COVID-19 cases. All these performances have occurred with CT scan images. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021-06 2021-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7992299/ /pubmed/34786568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bea.2021.100003 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Benmalek, Elmehdi
Elmhamdi, Jamal
Jilbab, Abdelilah
Comparing CT scan and chest X-ray imaging for COVID-19 diagnosis
title Comparing CT scan and chest X-ray imaging for COVID-19 diagnosis
title_full Comparing CT scan and chest X-ray imaging for COVID-19 diagnosis
title_fullStr Comparing CT scan and chest X-ray imaging for COVID-19 diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparing CT scan and chest X-ray imaging for COVID-19 diagnosis
title_short Comparing CT scan and chest X-ray imaging for COVID-19 diagnosis
title_sort comparing ct scan and chest x-ray imaging for covid-19 diagnosis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7992299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34786568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bea.2021.100003
work_keys_str_mv AT benmalekelmehdi comparingctscanandchestxrayimagingforcovid19diagnosis
AT elmhamdijamal comparingctscanandchestxrayimagingforcovid19diagnosis
AT jilbababdelilah comparingctscanandchestxrayimagingforcovid19diagnosis