Cargando…

Meta-analysis: COVID-19 diagnosis in chest CT—master key for radiologists

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 was discovered in February in China. Due to the high prevalence of the disease, early detection and rapid isolation of patients are the vital points for controlling the outbreak. The purpose of this study was to determine the correct location of chest CT scan in the diagnosis of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hassanipour, Soheil, Azadbakht, Omid, Dehnavi, Zari, Shafiee, Mohsen, Badeenezhad, Ahmad, Nikbakht, Hossein-Ali, Scandarkolaei, Parsa Faghani, Bostan, Hassan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7992511/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43055-021-00457-6
_version_ 1783669387636506624
author Hassanipour, Soheil
Azadbakht, Omid
Dehnavi, Zari
Shafiee, Mohsen
Badeenezhad, Ahmad
Nikbakht, Hossein-Ali
Scandarkolaei, Parsa Faghani
Bostan, Hassan
author_facet Hassanipour, Soheil
Azadbakht, Omid
Dehnavi, Zari
Shafiee, Mohsen
Badeenezhad, Ahmad
Nikbakht, Hossein-Ali
Scandarkolaei, Parsa Faghani
Bostan, Hassan
author_sort Hassanipour, Soheil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: COVID-19 was discovered in February in China. Due to the high prevalence of the disease, early detection and rapid isolation of patients are the vital points for controlling the outbreak. The purpose of this study was to determine the correct location of chest CT scan in the diagnosis of COVID-19. MAIN TEXT: The current study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2959 papers were found in all national and international databases. The study has been reported based on the PRISMA checklist. All analyses were done by CMA Ver. 2 software. The statistical analysis results show that the GGO observation level in the available shape was 46% in CT scan results, and the consolidation observation level in the general form was 33% in CT scan results. Pleural effusion was 7%, and linear opacity observation level was 24% in CT scan results in the general form. The CT scan test sensitivity level was gained 94.7%, and PCR test sensitivity level was achieved as 94.8%. This level was 89% in the early stage. CONCLUSION: The chest CT has about 24% higher diagnostic sensitivity than the PCR test, in the early stage. GGO revealed a declining process and also indicates that GGO is an early symptom of the disease in CT scan. Linear opacity is the reason behind the initial dyspnea in coronavirus suffering patients referring to the medical centers. The extra-pulmonary lesions increase in the last stage of the disease that makes the patient’s worse. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43055-021-00457-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7992511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79925112021-03-26 Meta-analysis: COVID-19 diagnosis in chest CT—master key for radiologists Hassanipour, Soheil Azadbakht, Omid Dehnavi, Zari Shafiee, Mohsen Badeenezhad, Ahmad Nikbakht, Hossein-Ali Scandarkolaei, Parsa Faghani Bostan, Hassan Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med Review BACKGROUND: COVID-19 was discovered in February in China. Due to the high prevalence of the disease, early detection and rapid isolation of patients are the vital points for controlling the outbreak. The purpose of this study was to determine the correct location of chest CT scan in the diagnosis of COVID-19. MAIN TEXT: The current study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2959 papers were found in all national and international databases. The study has been reported based on the PRISMA checklist. All analyses were done by CMA Ver. 2 software. The statistical analysis results show that the GGO observation level in the available shape was 46% in CT scan results, and the consolidation observation level in the general form was 33% in CT scan results. Pleural effusion was 7%, and linear opacity observation level was 24% in CT scan results in the general form. The CT scan test sensitivity level was gained 94.7%, and PCR test sensitivity level was achieved as 94.8%. This level was 89% in the early stage. CONCLUSION: The chest CT has about 24% higher diagnostic sensitivity than the PCR test, in the early stage. GGO revealed a declining process and also indicates that GGO is an early symptom of the disease in CT scan. Linear opacity is the reason behind the initial dyspnea in coronavirus suffering patients referring to the medical centers. The extra-pulmonary lesions increase in the last stage of the disease that makes the patient’s worse. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43055-021-00457-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-25 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7992511/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43055-021-00457-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Hassanipour, Soheil
Azadbakht, Omid
Dehnavi, Zari
Shafiee, Mohsen
Badeenezhad, Ahmad
Nikbakht, Hossein-Ali
Scandarkolaei, Parsa Faghani
Bostan, Hassan
Meta-analysis: COVID-19 diagnosis in chest CT—master key for radiologists
title Meta-analysis: COVID-19 diagnosis in chest CT—master key for radiologists
title_full Meta-analysis: COVID-19 diagnosis in chest CT—master key for radiologists
title_fullStr Meta-analysis: COVID-19 diagnosis in chest CT—master key for radiologists
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis: COVID-19 diagnosis in chest CT—master key for radiologists
title_short Meta-analysis: COVID-19 diagnosis in chest CT—master key for radiologists
title_sort meta-analysis: covid-19 diagnosis in chest ct—master key for radiologists
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7992511/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43055-021-00457-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hassanipoursoheil metaanalysiscovid19diagnosisinchestctmasterkeyforradiologists
AT azadbakhtomid metaanalysiscovid19diagnosisinchestctmasterkeyforradiologists
AT dehnavizari metaanalysiscovid19diagnosisinchestctmasterkeyforradiologists
AT shafieemohsen metaanalysiscovid19diagnosisinchestctmasterkeyforradiologists
AT badeenezhadahmad metaanalysiscovid19diagnosisinchestctmasterkeyforradiologists
AT nikbakhthosseinali metaanalysiscovid19diagnosisinchestctmasterkeyforradiologists
AT scandarkolaeiparsafaghani metaanalysiscovid19diagnosisinchestctmasterkeyforradiologists
AT bostanhassan metaanalysiscovid19diagnosisinchestctmasterkeyforradiologists