Cargando…
Cidofovir Intralesional Injection for Recalcitrant Common Warts: A Comparison with Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate Intralesional Injection
BACKGROUND: A novel treatment method is required for recalcitrant common warts. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the complete wart removal rate of cidofovir, a broad-spectrum antiviral agent, intralesional injection and sodium tetradecyl sulfate intralesional injection. METHODS: This retrospec...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Dermatological Association; The Korean Society for Investigative Dermatology
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7992651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33911754 http://dx.doi.org/10.5021/ad.2020.32.4.273 |
_version_ | 1783669420282871808 |
---|---|
author | Oh, Byung Ho |
author_facet | Oh, Byung Ho |
author_sort | Oh, Byung Ho |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A novel treatment method is required for recalcitrant common warts. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the complete wart removal rate of cidofovir, a broad-spectrum antiviral agent, intralesional injection and sodium tetradecyl sulfate intralesional injection. METHODS: This retrospective study included 45 patients with recalcitrant common warts on the hands and/or feet, treated with cidofovir or sodium tetradecyl sulfate intralesional injection. RESULTS: The treatment results were evaluated in three groups as follows: (1) failure - recalcitrant common warts remaining despite three or more injections, (2) success - free from warts for more than 6 months after the injection, and (3) recurrence. The cidofovir group (n=22) showed significantly higher treatment success rates than the sodium tetradecyl sulfate group (n=23) (90.91% vs. 26.09%, p<0.001). Two immunosuppressed patients in the cidofovir group had recurrent lesions after 2 months of being declared free from warts. Considering adverse effects, two patients in the cidofovir group complained of bulla formation with severe pain requiring narcotic painkillers. CONCLUSION: Although this study has the limitations of a small sample size and retrospective design, patients with recalcitrant common warts showed a dramatic response to the treatment with cidofovir intralesional injection, with minimal complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7992651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Korean Dermatological Association; The Korean Society for Investigative Dermatology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79926512021-04-27 Cidofovir Intralesional Injection for Recalcitrant Common Warts: A Comparison with Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate Intralesional Injection Oh, Byung Ho Ann Dermatol Original Article BACKGROUND: A novel treatment method is required for recalcitrant common warts. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the complete wart removal rate of cidofovir, a broad-spectrum antiviral agent, intralesional injection and sodium tetradecyl sulfate intralesional injection. METHODS: This retrospective study included 45 patients with recalcitrant common warts on the hands and/or feet, treated with cidofovir or sodium tetradecyl sulfate intralesional injection. RESULTS: The treatment results were evaluated in three groups as follows: (1) failure - recalcitrant common warts remaining despite three or more injections, (2) success - free from warts for more than 6 months after the injection, and (3) recurrence. The cidofovir group (n=22) showed significantly higher treatment success rates than the sodium tetradecyl sulfate group (n=23) (90.91% vs. 26.09%, p<0.001). Two immunosuppressed patients in the cidofovir group had recurrent lesions after 2 months of being declared free from warts. Considering adverse effects, two patients in the cidofovir group complained of bulla formation with severe pain requiring narcotic painkillers. CONCLUSION: Although this study has the limitations of a small sample size and retrospective design, patients with recalcitrant common warts showed a dramatic response to the treatment with cidofovir intralesional injection, with minimal complications. The Korean Dermatological Association; The Korean Society for Investigative Dermatology 2020-08 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7992651/ /pubmed/33911754 http://dx.doi.org/10.5021/ad.2020.32.4.273 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Korean Dermatological Association and The Korean Society for Investigative Dermatology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Oh, Byung Ho Cidofovir Intralesional Injection for Recalcitrant Common Warts: A Comparison with Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate Intralesional Injection |
title | Cidofovir Intralesional Injection for Recalcitrant Common Warts: A Comparison with Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate Intralesional Injection |
title_full | Cidofovir Intralesional Injection for Recalcitrant Common Warts: A Comparison with Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate Intralesional Injection |
title_fullStr | Cidofovir Intralesional Injection for Recalcitrant Common Warts: A Comparison with Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate Intralesional Injection |
title_full_unstemmed | Cidofovir Intralesional Injection for Recalcitrant Common Warts: A Comparison with Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate Intralesional Injection |
title_short | Cidofovir Intralesional Injection for Recalcitrant Common Warts: A Comparison with Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate Intralesional Injection |
title_sort | cidofovir intralesional injection for recalcitrant common warts: a comparison with sodium tetradecyl sulfate intralesional injection |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7992651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33911754 http://dx.doi.org/10.5021/ad.2020.32.4.273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohbyungho cidofovirintralesionalinjectionforrecalcitrantcommonwartsacomparisonwithsodiumtetradecylsulfateintralesionalinjection |