Cargando…

The use of personal health information outside the circle of care: consent preferences of patients from an academic health care institution

BACKGROUND: Immense volumes of personal health information (PHI) are required to realize the anticipated benefits of artificial intelligence in clinical medicine. To maintain public trust in medical research, consent policies must evolve to reflect contemporary patient preferences. METHODS: Patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tosoni, Sarah, Voruganti, Indu, Lajkosz, Katherine, Habal, Flavio, Murphy, Patricia, Wong, Rebecca K. S., Willison, Donald, Virtanen, Carl, Heesters, Ann, Liu, Fei-Fei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7992944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00598-3
_version_ 1783669477854937088
author Tosoni, Sarah
Voruganti, Indu
Lajkosz, Katherine
Habal, Flavio
Murphy, Patricia
Wong, Rebecca K. S.
Willison, Donald
Virtanen, Carl
Heesters, Ann
Liu, Fei-Fei
author_facet Tosoni, Sarah
Voruganti, Indu
Lajkosz, Katherine
Habal, Flavio
Murphy, Patricia
Wong, Rebecca K. S.
Willison, Donald
Virtanen, Carl
Heesters, Ann
Liu, Fei-Fei
author_sort Tosoni, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immense volumes of personal health information (PHI) are required to realize the anticipated benefits of artificial intelligence in clinical medicine. To maintain public trust in medical research, consent policies must evolve to reflect contemporary patient preferences. METHODS: Patients were invited to complete a 27-item survey focusing on: (a) broad versus specific consent; (b) opt-in versus opt-out approaches; (c) comfort level sharing with different recipients; (d) attitudes towards commercialization; and (e) options to track PHI use and study results. RESULTS: 222 participants were included in the analysis; 83% were comfortable sharing PHI with researchers at their own hospital, although younger patients (≤ 49 years) were more uncomfortable than older patients (50 + years; 13% versus 2% uncomfortable, p < 0.05). While 56% of patients preferred broad consent, 38% preferred specific consent; 6% preferred not sharing at all. The majority of patients (63%) preferred to be asked for permission before entry into a contact pool. Again, this trend was more pronounced for younger patients (≤ 49 years: 76%). Approximately half of patients were uncomfortable sharing PHI with commercial enterprises (51% uncomfortable, 27% comfortable, 22% neutral). Most patients preferred to track PHI usage (61%), with the highest proportion once again reported by the youngest patients (≤ 49 years: 71%). A majority of patients also wished to be notified regarding study results (70%). CONCLUSIONS: While most patients were willing to share their PHI with researchers within their own institution, many preferred a transparent and reciprocal consent process. These data also suggest a generational shift, wherein younger patients preferred more specific consent options. Modernizing consent policies to reflect increased autonomy is crucial in fostering sustained public engagement with medical research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-021-00598-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7992944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79929442021-03-25 The use of personal health information outside the circle of care: consent preferences of patients from an academic health care institution Tosoni, Sarah Voruganti, Indu Lajkosz, Katherine Habal, Flavio Murphy, Patricia Wong, Rebecca K. S. Willison, Donald Virtanen, Carl Heesters, Ann Liu, Fei-Fei BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Immense volumes of personal health information (PHI) are required to realize the anticipated benefits of artificial intelligence in clinical medicine. To maintain public trust in medical research, consent policies must evolve to reflect contemporary patient preferences. METHODS: Patients were invited to complete a 27-item survey focusing on: (a) broad versus specific consent; (b) opt-in versus opt-out approaches; (c) comfort level sharing with different recipients; (d) attitudes towards commercialization; and (e) options to track PHI use and study results. RESULTS: 222 participants were included in the analysis; 83% were comfortable sharing PHI with researchers at their own hospital, although younger patients (≤ 49 years) were more uncomfortable than older patients (50 + years; 13% versus 2% uncomfortable, p < 0.05). While 56% of patients preferred broad consent, 38% preferred specific consent; 6% preferred not sharing at all. The majority of patients (63%) preferred to be asked for permission before entry into a contact pool. Again, this trend was more pronounced for younger patients (≤ 49 years: 76%). Approximately half of patients were uncomfortable sharing PHI with commercial enterprises (51% uncomfortable, 27% comfortable, 22% neutral). Most patients preferred to track PHI usage (61%), with the highest proportion once again reported by the youngest patients (≤ 49 years: 71%). A majority of patients also wished to be notified regarding study results (70%). CONCLUSIONS: While most patients were willing to share their PHI with researchers within their own institution, many preferred a transparent and reciprocal consent process. These data also suggest a generational shift, wherein younger patients preferred more specific consent options. Modernizing consent policies to reflect increased autonomy is crucial in fostering sustained public engagement with medical research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-021-00598-3. BioMed Central 2021-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7992944/ /pubmed/33761938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00598-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tosoni, Sarah
Voruganti, Indu
Lajkosz, Katherine
Habal, Flavio
Murphy, Patricia
Wong, Rebecca K. S.
Willison, Donald
Virtanen, Carl
Heesters, Ann
Liu, Fei-Fei
The use of personal health information outside the circle of care: consent preferences of patients from an academic health care institution
title The use of personal health information outside the circle of care: consent preferences of patients from an academic health care institution
title_full The use of personal health information outside the circle of care: consent preferences of patients from an academic health care institution
title_fullStr The use of personal health information outside the circle of care: consent preferences of patients from an academic health care institution
title_full_unstemmed The use of personal health information outside the circle of care: consent preferences of patients from an academic health care institution
title_short The use of personal health information outside the circle of care: consent preferences of patients from an academic health care institution
title_sort use of personal health information outside the circle of care: consent preferences of patients from an academic health care institution
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7992944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00598-3
work_keys_str_mv AT tosonisarah theuseofpersonalhealthinformationoutsidethecircleofcareconsentpreferencesofpatientsfromanacademichealthcareinstitution
AT vorugantiindu theuseofpersonalhealthinformationoutsidethecircleofcareconsentpreferencesofpatientsfromanacademichealthcareinstitution
AT lajkoszkatherine theuseofpersonalhealthinformationoutsidethecircleofcareconsentpreferencesofpatientsfromanacademichealthcareinstitution
AT habalflavio theuseofpersonalhealthinformationoutsidethecircleofcareconsentpreferencesofpatientsfromanacademichealthcareinstitution
AT murphypatricia theuseofpersonalhealthinformationoutsidethecircleofcareconsentpreferencesofpatientsfromanacademichealthcareinstitution
AT wongrebeccaks theuseofpersonalhealthinformationoutsidethecircleofcareconsentpreferencesofpatientsfromanacademichealthcareinstitution
AT willisondonald theuseofpersonalhealthinformationoutsidethecircleofcareconsentpreferencesofpatientsfromanacademichealthcareinstitution
AT virtanencarl theuseofpersonalhealthinformationoutsidethecircleofcareconsentpreferencesofpatientsfromanacademichealthcareinstitution
AT heestersann theuseofpersonalhealthinformationoutsidethecircleofcareconsentpreferencesofpatientsfromanacademichealthcareinstitution
AT liufeifei theuseofpersonalhealthinformationoutsidethecircleofcareconsentpreferencesofpatientsfromanacademichealthcareinstitution
AT tosonisarah useofpersonalhealthinformationoutsidethecircleofcareconsentpreferencesofpatientsfromanacademichealthcareinstitution
AT vorugantiindu useofpersonalhealthinformationoutsidethecircleofcareconsentpreferencesofpatientsfromanacademichealthcareinstitution
AT lajkoszkatherine useofpersonalhealthinformationoutsidethecircleofcareconsentpreferencesofpatientsfromanacademichealthcareinstitution
AT habalflavio useofpersonalhealthinformationoutsidethecircleofcareconsentpreferencesofpatientsfromanacademichealthcareinstitution
AT murphypatricia useofpersonalhealthinformationoutsidethecircleofcareconsentpreferencesofpatientsfromanacademichealthcareinstitution
AT wongrebeccaks useofpersonalhealthinformationoutsidethecircleofcareconsentpreferencesofpatientsfromanacademichealthcareinstitution
AT willisondonald useofpersonalhealthinformationoutsidethecircleofcareconsentpreferencesofpatientsfromanacademichealthcareinstitution
AT virtanencarl useofpersonalhealthinformationoutsidethecircleofcareconsentpreferencesofpatientsfromanacademichealthcareinstitution
AT heestersann useofpersonalhealthinformationoutsidethecircleofcareconsentpreferencesofpatientsfromanacademichealthcareinstitution
AT liufeifei useofpersonalhealthinformationoutsidethecircleofcareconsentpreferencesofpatientsfromanacademichealthcareinstitution