Cargando…

Colonic pouch confers better bowel function and similar postoperative outcomes compared to straight anastomosis for low rectal cancer

BACKGROUND: With advancements in laparoscopic technology and the wide application of linear staplers, sphincter-saving procedures are increasingly performed for low rectal cancer. However, sphincter-saving procedures have led to the emergence of a unique clinical disorder termed anterior rectal rese...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Zhen-Zhou, Li, Yi-Dan, Huang, Wang, Chai, Ning-Hui, Wei, Zheng-Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7992999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33796217
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i3.303
_version_ 1783669489215209472
author Chen, Zhen-Zhou
Li, Yi-Dan
Huang, Wang
Chai, Ning-Hui
Wei, Zheng-Qiang
author_facet Chen, Zhen-Zhou
Li, Yi-Dan
Huang, Wang
Chai, Ning-Hui
Wei, Zheng-Qiang
author_sort Chen, Zhen-Zhou
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With advancements in laparoscopic technology and the wide application of linear staplers, sphincter-saving procedures are increasingly performed for low rectal cancer. However, sphincter-saving procedures have led to the emergence of a unique clinical disorder termed anterior rectal resection syndrome. Colonic pouch anastomosis improves the quality of life of patients with rectal cancer > 7 cm from the anal margin. But whether colonic pouch anastomosis can reduce the incidence of rectal resection syndrome in patients with low rectal cancer is unknown. AIM: To compare postoperative and oncological outcomes and bowel function of straight and colonic pouch anal anastomoses after resection of low rectal cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 72 patients with low rectal cancer who underwent sphincter-saving procedures with either straight or colonic pouch anastomoses. Functional evaluations were completed preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 mo postoperatively. We also compared perioperative and oncological outcomes between two groups that had undergone low or ultralow anterior rectal resection. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in mean operating time, blood loss, time to first passage of flatus and excrement, and duration of hospital stay between the colonic pouch and straight anastomosis groups. The incidence of anastomotic leakage following colonic pouch construction was lower (11.4% vs 16.2%) but not significantly different than that of straight anastomosis. Patients with colonic pouch construction had lower postoperative low anterior resection syndrome scores than the straight anastomosis group, suggesting better bowel function (preoperative: 4.71 vs 3.89, P = 0.43; 1 mo after surgery: 34.2 vs 34.7, P = 0.59; 6 mo after surgery: 22.70 vs 29.0, P < 0.05; 12 mo after surgery: 15.5 vs 19.5, P = 0.01). The overall recurrence and metastasis rates were similar (4.3% and 11.4%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Colonic pouch anastomosis is a safe and effective procedure for colorectal reconstruction after low and ultralow rectal resections. Moreover, colonic pouch construction may provide better functional outcomes compared to straight anastomosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7992999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79929992021-03-31 Colonic pouch confers better bowel function and similar postoperative outcomes compared to straight anastomosis for low rectal cancer Chen, Zhen-Zhou Li, Yi-Dan Huang, Wang Chai, Ning-Hui Wei, Zheng-Qiang World J Gastrointest Surg Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: With advancements in laparoscopic technology and the wide application of linear staplers, sphincter-saving procedures are increasingly performed for low rectal cancer. However, sphincter-saving procedures have led to the emergence of a unique clinical disorder termed anterior rectal resection syndrome. Colonic pouch anastomosis improves the quality of life of patients with rectal cancer > 7 cm from the anal margin. But whether colonic pouch anastomosis can reduce the incidence of rectal resection syndrome in patients with low rectal cancer is unknown. AIM: To compare postoperative and oncological outcomes and bowel function of straight and colonic pouch anal anastomoses after resection of low rectal cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 72 patients with low rectal cancer who underwent sphincter-saving procedures with either straight or colonic pouch anastomoses. Functional evaluations were completed preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 mo postoperatively. We also compared perioperative and oncological outcomes between two groups that had undergone low or ultralow anterior rectal resection. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in mean operating time, blood loss, time to first passage of flatus and excrement, and duration of hospital stay between the colonic pouch and straight anastomosis groups. The incidence of anastomotic leakage following colonic pouch construction was lower (11.4% vs 16.2%) but not significantly different than that of straight anastomosis. Patients with colonic pouch construction had lower postoperative low anterior resection syndrome scores than the straight anastomosis group, suggesting better bowel function (preoperative: 4.71 vs 3.89, P = 0.43; 1 mo after surgery: 34.2 vs 34.7, P = 0.59; 6 mo after surgery: 22.70 vs 29.0, P < 0.05; 12 mo after surgery: 15.5 vs 19.5, P = 0.01). The overall recurrence and metastasis rates were similar (4.3% and 11.4%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Colonic pouch anastomosis is a safe and effective procedure for colorectal reconstruction after low and ultralow rectal resections. Moreover, colonic pouch construction may provide better functional outcomes compared to straight anastomosis. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-03-27 2021-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7992999/ /pubmed/33796217 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i3.303 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Chen, Zhen-Zhou
Li, Yi-Dan
Huang, Wang
Chai, Ning-Hui
Wei, Zheng-Qiang
Colonic pouch confers better bowel function and similar postoperative outcomes compared to straight anastomosis for low rectal cancer
title Colonic pouch confers better bowel function and similar postoperative outcomes compared to straight anastomosis for low rectal cancer
title_full Colonic pouch confers better bowel function and similar postoperative outcomes compared to straight anastomosis for low rectal cancer
title_fullStr Colonic pouch confers better bowel function and similar postoperative outcomes compared to straight anastomosis for low rectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Colonic pouch confers better bowel function and similar postoperative outcomes compared to straight anastomosis for low rectal cancer
title_short Colonic pouch confers better bowel function and similar postoperative outcomes compared to straight anastomosis for low rectal cancer
title_sort colonic pouch confers better bowel function and similar postoperative outcomes compared to straight anastomosis for low rectal cancer
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7992999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33796217
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i3.303
work_keys_str_mv AT chenzhenzhou colonicpouchconfersbetterbowelfunctionandsimilarpostoperativeoutcomescomparedtostraightanastomosisforlowrectalcancer
AT liyidan colonicpouchconfersbetterbowelfunctionandsimilarpostoperativeoutcomescomparedtostraightanastomosisforlowrectalcancer
AT huangwang colonicpouchconfersbetterbowelfunctionandsimilarpostoperativeoutcomescomparedtostraightanastomosisforlowrectalcancer
AT chaininghui colonicpouchconfersbetterbowelfunctionandsimilarpostoperativeoutcomescomparedtostraightanastomosisforlowrectalcancer
AT weizhengqiang colonicpouchconfersbetterbowelfunctionandsimilarpostoperativeoutcomescomparedtostraightanastomosisforlowrectalcancer