Cargando…

Interpregnancy intervals and child development at age 5: a population data linkage study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations between interpregnancy intervals (IPIs) and developmental vulnerability in children’s first year of full-time school (age 5). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using logistic regression. ORs were estimated for associations with IPIs with adjustment for chi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhamrait, Gursimran Kaur, Taylor, Catherine Louise, Pereira, Gavin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7993213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33757954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045319
_version_ 1783669520398811136
author Dhamrait, Gursimran Kaur
Taylor, Catherine Louise
Pereira, Gavin
author_facet Dhamrait, Gursimran Kaur
Taylor, Catherine Louise
Pereira, Gavin
author_sort Dhamrait, Gursimran Kaur
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations between interpregnancy intervals (IPIs) and developmental vulnerability in children’s first year of full-time school (age 5). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using logistic regression. ORs were estimated for associations with IPIs with adjustment for child, parent and community sociodemographic variables. SETTING: Western Australia (WA), 2002–2015. PARTICIPANTS: 34 574 WA born singletons with a 2009, 2012 or 2015 Australian Early Development Census (AEDC) record. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The AEDC measures child development across five domains; Physical Health and Wellbeing, Social Competence, Emotional Maturity, Language and Cognitive Skills (school-based) and Communication Skills and General Knowledge. Children with scores <10th percentile were classified as developmentally vulnerable on, one or more domains (DV1), or two or more domains (DV2). RESULTS: 22.8% and 11.5% of children were classified as DV1 and DV2, respectively. In the adjusted models (relative to the reference category, IPIs of 18–23 months), IPIs of <6 months were associated with an increased risk of children being classified as DV1 (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.17, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.34), DV2 (aOR 1.31, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.54) and an increased risk of developmental vulnerability for the domains of Physical Health and Wellbeing (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.48) and Emotional Maturity (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.66). All IPIs longer than the reference category were associated with and increased risk of children being classified as DV1 and DV2 (aOR >1.15). IPIs of 60–119 months and ≥120 months, were associated with an increased risk of developmental vulnerability on each of the five AEDC domains, with greater odds for each domain for the longer IPI category. CONCLUSIONS: IPIs showed independent J-shaped relationships with developmental vulnerability, with short (<6 months) and longer (≥24 months) associated with increased risks of developmental vulnerability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7993213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79932132021-04-19 Interpregnancy intervals and child development at age 5: a population data linkage study Dhamrait, Gursimran Kaur Taylor, Catherine Louise Pereira, Gavin BMJ Open Paediatrics OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations between interpregnancy intervals (IPIs) and developmental vulnerability in children’s first year of full-time school (age 5). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using logistic regression. ORs were estimated for associations with IPIs with adjustment for child, parent and community sociodemographic variables. SETTING: Western Australia (WA), 2002–2015. PARTICIPANTS: 34 574 WA born singletons with a 2009, 2012 or 2015 Australian Early Development Census (AEDC) record. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The AEDC measures child development across five domains; Physical Health and Wellbeing, Social Competence, Emotional Maturity, Language and Cognitive Skills (school-based) and Communication Skills and General Knowledge. Children with scores <10th percentile were classified as developmentally vulnerable on, one or more domains (DV1), or two or more domains (DV2). RESULTS: 22.8% and 11.5% of children were classified as DV1 and DV2, respectively. In the adjusted models (relative to the reference category, IPIs of 18–23 months), IPIs of <6 months were associated with an increased risk of children being classified as DV1 (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.17, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.34), DV2 (aOR 1.31, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.54) and an increased risk of developmental vulnerability for the domains of Physical Health and Wellbeing (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.48) and Emotional Maturity (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.66). All IPIs longer than the reference category were associated with and increased risk of children being classified as DV1 and DV2 (aOR >1.15). IPIs of 60–119 months and ≥120 months, were associated with an increased risk of developmental vulnerability on each of the five AEDC domains, with greater odds for each domain for the longer IPI category. CONCLUSIONS: IPIs showed independent J-shaped relationships with developmental vulnerability, with short (<6 months) and longer (≥24 months) associated with increased risks of developmental vulnerability. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7993213/ /pubmed/33757954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045319 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Paediatrics
Dhamrait, Gursimran Kaur
Taylor, Catherine Louise
Pereira, Gavin
Interpregnancy intervals and child development at age 5: a population data linkage study
title Interpregnancy intervals and child development at age 5: a population data linkage study
title_full Interpregnancy intervals and child development at age 5: a population data linkage study
title_fullStr Interpregnancy intervals and child development at age 5: a population data linkage study
title_full_unstemmed Interpregnancy intervals and child development at age 5: a population data linkage study
title_short Interpregnancy intervals and child development at age 5: a population data linkage study
title_sort interpregnancy intervals and child development at age 5: a population data linkage study
topic Paediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7993213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33757954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045319
work_keys_str_mv AT dhamraitgursimrankaur interpregnancyintervalsandchilddevelopmentatage5apopulationdatalinkagestudy
AT taylorcatherinelouise interpregnancyintervalsandchilddevelopmentatage5apopulationdatalinkagestudy
AT pereiragavin interpregnancyintervalsandchilddevelopmentatage5apopulationdatalinkagestudy