Cargando…

Defining standards in colorectal optimisation: a Delphi study protocol to achieve international consensus on key standards for colorectal surgery prehabilitation

INTRODUCTION: Prehabilitation in colorectal surgery is evolving and may minimise postoperative morbidity and mortality. With many different healthcare professionals contributing to the prehabilitation literature, there is significant variation in reported primary endpoints that restricts comparison....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pearson, Iona, Blackwell, Sue, Fish, Rebecca, Daniels, Sarah, West, Malcolm, Mutrie, Nanette, Kelly, P, Knight, Stephen, Fearnhead, Nicola S, Moug, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7993327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33762250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047235
_version_ 1783669542396887040
author Pearson, Iona
Blackwell, Sue
Fish, Rebecca
Daniels, Sarah
West, Malcolm
Mutrie, Nanette
Kelly, P
Knight, Stephen
Fearnhead, Nicola S
Moug, Susan
author_facet Pearson, Iona
Blackwell, Sue
Fish, Rebecca
Daniels, Sarah
West, Malcolm
Mutrie, Nanette
Kelly, P
Knight, Stephen
Fearnhead, Nicola S
Moug, Susan
author_sort Pearson, Iona
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Prehabilitation in colorectal surgery is evolving and may minimise postoperative morbidity and mortality. With many different healthcare professionals contributing to the prehabilitation literature, there is significant variation in reported primary endpoints that restricts comparison. In addition, there has been limited work on patient-related outcome measures suggesting that patients with colorectal cancer needs and issues are being overlooked. The Defining Standards in Colorectal Optimisation Study aims to achieve international consensus from all stakeholders on key standards to provide a framework for reporting future prehabilitation research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review will identify key standards reported in trials of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery. Standards that are important to patients will be identified by a patient and public involvement (PPI) event. The longlist of standards generated from the systematic review and PPI event will be used to develop a three-round online Delphi process. This will engage all stakeholders (healthcare professionals and patients) both nationally and internationally. The results of the Delphi will be followed by a face-to-face interactive consensus meeting that will define the final standards for prehabilitation for elective colorectal surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of Glasgow College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences Ethics Committee has approved this protocol, which is registered as a study (200190120) with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative. Publication of the standards developed by all stakeholders will increase the potential for comparative research that advances understanding of the clinical application of prehabilitation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019120381.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7993327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79933272021-04-19 Defining standards in colorectal optimisation: a Delphi study protocol to achieve international consensus on key standards for colorectal surgery prehabilitation Pearson, Iona Blackwell, Sue Fish, Rebecca Daniels, Sarah West, Malcolm Mutrie, Nanette Kelly, P Knight, Stephen Fearnhead, Nicola S Moug, Susan BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Prehabilitation in colorectal surgery is evolving and may minimise postoperative morbidity and mortality. With many different healthcare professionals contributing to the prehabilitation literature, there is significant variation in reported primary endpoints that restricts comparison. In addition, there has been limited work on patient-related outcome measures suggesting that patients with colorectal cancer needs and issues are being overlooked. The Defining Standards in Colorectal Optimisation Study aims to achieve international consensus from all stakeholders on key standards to provide a framework for reporting future prehabilitation research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review will identify key standards reported in trials of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery. Standards that are important to patients will be identified by a patient and public involvement (PPI) event. The longlist of standards generated from the systematic review and PPI event will be used to develop a three-round online Delphi process. This will engage all stakeholders (healthcare professionals and patients) both nationally and internationally. The results of the Delphi will be followed by a face-to-face interactive consensus meeting that will define the final standards for prehabilitation for elective colorectal surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of Glasgow College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences Ethics Committee has approved this protocol, which is registered as a study (200190120) with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative. Publication of the standards developed by all stakeholders will increase the potential for comparative research that advances understanding of the clinical application of prehabilitation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019120381. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7993327/ /pubmed/33762250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047235 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Pearson, Iona
Blackwell, Sue
Fish, Rebecca
Daniels, Sarah
West, Malcolm
Mutrie, Nanette
Kelly, P
Knight, Stephen
Fearnhead, Nicola S
Moug, Susan
Defining standards in colorectal optimisation: a Delphi study protocol to achieve international consensus on key standards for colorectal surgery prehabilitation
title Defining standards in colorectal optimisation: a Delphi study protocol to achieve international consensus on key standards for colorectal surgery prehabilitation
title_full Defining standards in colorectal optimisation: a Delphi study protocol to achieve international consensus on key standards for colorectal surgery prehabilitation
title_fullStr Defining standards in colorectal optimisation: a Delphi study protocol to achieve international consensus on key standards for colorectal surgery prehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed Defining standards in colorectal optimisation: a Delphi study protocol to achieve international consensus on key standards for colorectal surgery prehabilitation
title_short Defining standards in colorectal optimisation: a Delphi study protocol to achieve international consensus on key standards for colorectal surgery prehabilitation
title_sort defining standards in colorectal optimisation: a delphi study protocol to achieve international consensus on key standards for colorectal surgery prehabilitation
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7993327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33762250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047235
work_keys_str_mv AT pearsoniona definingstandardsincolorectaloptimisationadelphistudyprotocoltoachieveinternationalconsensusonkeystandardsforcolorectalsurgeryprehabilitation
AT blackwellsue definingstandardsincolorectaloptimisationadelphistudyprotocoltoachieveinternationalconsensusonkeystandardsforcolorectalsurgeryprehabilitation
AT fishrebecca definingstandardsincolorectaloptimisationadelphistudyprotocoltoachieveinternationalconsensusonkeystandardsforcolorectalsurgeryprehabilitation
AT danielssarah definingstandardsincolorectaloptimisationadelphistudyprotocoltoachieveinternationalconsensusonkeystandardsforcolorectalsurgeryprehabilitation
AT westmalcolm definingstandardsincolorectaloptimisationadelphistudyprotocoltoachieveinternationalconsensusonkeystandardsforcolorectalsurgeryprehabilitation
AT mutrienanette definingstandardsincolorectaloptimisationadelphistudyprotocoltoachieveinternationalconsensusonkeystandardsforcolorectalsurgeryprehabilitation
AT kellyp definingstandardsincolorectaloptimisationadelphistudyprotocoltoachieveinternationalconsensusonkeystandardsforcolorectalsurgeryprehabilitation
AT knightstephen definingstandardsincolorectaloptimisationadelphistudyprotocoltoachieveinternationalconsensusonkeystandardsforcolorectalsurgeryprehabilitation
AT fearnheadnicolas definingstandardsincolorectaloptimisationadelphistudyprotocoltoachieveinternationalconsensusonkeystandardsforcolorectalsurgeryprehabilitation
AT mougsusan definingstandardsincolorectaloptimisationadelphistudyprotocoltoachieveinternationalconsensusonkeystandardsforcolorectalsurgeryprehabilitation