Cargando…
Improving Science by Overcoming Laboratory Pitfalls With Hormone Measurements
Despite all the effort taken, there is often surprisingly little attention paid to the hormone analyses involved in research studies. Thinking carefully about the quality of the hormone measurements in these studies is, however, of major importance, as this attention to methods may prevent false con...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7993596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33382880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa923 |
_version_ | 1783669587124944896 |
---|---|
author | Hillebrand, Jacquelien J Wickenhagen, Wjera V Heijboer, Annemieke C |
author_facet | Hillebrand, Jacquelien J Wickenhagen, Wjera V Heijboer, Annemieke C |
author_sort | Hillebrand, Jacquelien J |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite all the effort taken, there is often surprisingly little attention paid to the hormone analyses involved in research studies. Thinking carefully about the quality of the hormone measurements in these studies is, however, of major importance, as this attention to methods may prevent false conclusions and inappropriate follow-up studies. We discuss issues regarding hormone measurements that one should consider, ideally prior to starting, or otherwise, as they arise during a scientific study: quality of the technique, expertise, matrices, timing and storage conditions, freeze-thaw cycles, lot-to-lot and day-to-day variation, analyses per batch or sample-wise, singlicate or duplicate measurements, combining methods, and standardization. This article and the examples mentioned herein aim to clarify the need to pay attention to the hormone analyses, and to help in making decisions. In addition, these examples help editors and reviewers of scientific journals to pay attention to the methods section in the submitted manuscripts and ask the right critical questions when needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7993596 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79935962021-04-01 Improving Science by Overcoming Laboratory Pitfalls With Hormone Measurements Hillebrand, Jacquelien J Wickenhagen, Wjera V Heijboer, Annemieke C J Clin Endocrinol Metab Mini-Reviews Despite all the effort taken, there is often surprisingly little attention paid to the hormone analyses involved in research studies. Thinking carefully about the quality of the hormone measurements in these studies is, however, of major importance, as this attention to methods may prevent false conclusions and inappropriate follow-up studies. We discuss issues regarding hormone measurements that one should consider, ideally prior to starting, or otherwise, as they arise during a scientific study: quality of the technique, expertise, matrices, timing and storage conditions, freeze-thaw cycles, lot-to-lot and day-to-day variation, analyses per batch or sample-wise, singlicate or duplicate measurements, combining methods, and standardization. This article and the examples mentioned herein aim to clarify the need to pay attention to the hormone analyses, and to help in making decisions. In addition, these examples help editors and reviewers of scientific journals to pay attention to the methods section in the submitted manuscripts and ask the right critical questions when needed. Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7993596/ /pubmed/33382880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa923 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Mini-Reviews Hillebrand, Jacquelien J Wickenhagen, Wjera V Heijboer, Annemieke C Improving Science by Overcoming Laboratory Pitfalls With Hormone Measurements |
title | Improving Science by Overcoming Laboratory Pitfalls With Hormone Measurements |
title_full | Improving Science by Overcoming Laboratory Pitfalls With Hormone Measurements |
title_fullStr | Improving Science by Overcoming Laboratory Pitfalls With Hormone Measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving Science by Overcoming Laboratory Pitfalls With Hormone Measurements |
title_short | Improving Science by Overcoming Laboratory Pitfalls With Hormone Measurements |
title_sort | improving science by overcoming laboratory pitfalls with hormone measurements |
topic | Mini-Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7993596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33382880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa923 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hillebrandjacquelienj improvingsciencebyovercominglaboratorypitfallswithhormonemeasurements AT wickenhagenwjerav improvingsciencebyovercominglaboratorypitfallswithhormonemeasurements AT heijboerannemiekec improvingsciencebyovercominglaboratorypitfallswithhormonemeasurements |