Cargando…

Luts-V: A new simplified score for assessing lower urinary tract symptoms in men

OBJECTIVES: Develop and validate a new and simplified score for evaluating the lower urinary tract symptoms in men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We modified the existing visual prostate symptom score, including changes in the images, sequence, and new alternatives, resulting in a new visual score (LUTS vi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silva, Caroline Santos, de Araujo, Ueslei Menezes, Alvaia, Mateus Andrade, Freitas, Kátia Santana, Tiraboschi, Taciana Leonel Nunes, Gomes, Cristiano Mendes, de Bessa, José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7993949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33620997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0278
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Develop and validate a new and simplified score for evaluating the lower urinary tract symptoms in men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We modified the existing visual prostate symptom score, including changes in the images, sequence, and new alternatives, resulting in a new visual score (LUTS visual score-LUTS-V). For the validation of the new tool, we used the International Prostatic Symptom Score as the gold-standard and the new LUTS-V to 306 men. The total IPSS score and the total LUTS-V score of each subject were evaluated to determine the agreement between the two instruments. ROC curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and best cut-off of LUTS-V. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios were used to describe the diagnostic properties. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 59 [52-87] years. There was a significant correlation between LUTS-V and IPSS. (r=0.72 (p <0.0001). The Bland-Altman analyzes demonstrate good agreement between the two questionnaires (bias=5.6%). LUTS-V demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy in detecting the most serious cases with an area under the ROC curve of 83% [78-87%] 95% CI. p <0.001). LUTS-V >4 was the best threshold, with a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 78%. CONCLUSIONS: LUTS-V is a simple, self-administered tool with a significant discriminatory power to identify subjects with moderate to severe LUTS and may represent a useful instrument for the diagnosis and follow-up of men with urinary symptoms.