Cargando…

Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: the evolution of a surgical technique

PURPOSE: Enucleation of a large prostate is the best surgical choice for patients refractory to clinical treatment (1,2). Since the first robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) was described (3,4), some technical modifications (5–7) and different approaches to reach the adenoma have been propose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodrigues, Gilberto J., Sawczyn, Guilherme V., Guglielmetti, Giuliano B., Fazoli, Arnaldo J. C., Tanure, Luís H. R., Nahas, William C., Coelho, Rafael F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7993952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33621025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0744
_version_ 1783669662502879232
author Rodrigues, Gilberto J.
Sawczyn, Guilherme V.
Guglielmetti, Giuliano B.
Fazoli, Arnaldo J. C.
Tanure, Luís H. R.
Nahas, William C.
Coelho, Rafael F.
author_facet Rodrigues, Gilberto J.
Sawczyn, Guilherme V.
Guglielmetti, Giuliano B.
Fazoli, Arnaldo J. C.
Tanure, Luís H. R.
Nahas, William C.
Coelho, Rafael F.
author_sort Rodrigues, Gilberto J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Enucleation of a large prostate is the best surgical choice for patients refractory to clinical treatment (1,2). Since the first robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) was described (3,4), some technical modifications (5–7) and different approaches to reach the adenoma have been proposed (8,9). The aim of this video is to demonstrate three different techniques of RASP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The first procedure begins with a transversal incision over the bladder neck, the second is a transvesical approach and the last one is a Retzius-sparing RASP. All techniques were performed with a vesico-urethral anastomosis. RESULTS: Three patients underwent RASP, each one with a different approach. Patients presented mean age of 66±4.4 years, PSA baseline level of 7.8±3ng/mL, IPSS score of 17.7±4.5, maximum urine flow of 8.3±1.5mL/seg and 122.3±11.2cm3 of prostate volume. The mean operative time was 63±8 minutes, estimated blood loss of 106.7±11.5mL, prostate weight of the surgical specimen of 106.3±8 grams and 1 day of length of stay. No continuous bladder irrigation was required and there was no complication. The mean postoperative PSA and IPSS were 0.7±0.3ng/mL, 4.7±1.5. The maximum urine flow raised to 20±4.4mL/seg. CONCLUSIONS: RASP with vesico-urethral anastomosis allowed minimal blood loss, short length of stay and great functional outcomes. All the three approaches allowed to perform this technique in a safe way, while showing different alternatives to reach the adenoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7993952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79939522021-03-27 Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: the evolution of a surgical technique Rodrigues, Gilberto J. Sawczyn, Guilherme V. Guglielmetti, Giuliano B. Fazoli, Arnaldo J. C. Tanure, Luís H. R. Nahas, William C. Coelho, Rafael F. Int Braz J Urol Video Section PURPOSE: Enucleation of a large prostate is the best surgical choice for patients refractory to clinical treatment (1,2). Since the first robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) was described (3,4), some technical modifications (5–7) and different approaches to reach the adenoma have been proposed (8,9). The aim of this video is to demonstrate three different techniques of RASP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The first procedure begins with a transversal incision over the bladder neck, the second is a transvesical approach and the last one is a Retzius-sparing RASP. All techniques were performed with a vesico-urethral anastomosis. RESULTS: Three patients underwent RASP, each one with a different approach. Patients presented mean age of 66±4.4 years, PSA baseline level of 7.8±3ng/mL, IPSS score of 17.7±4.5, maximum urine flow of 8.3±1.5mL/seg and 122.3±11.2cm3 of prostate volume. The mean operative time was 63±8 minutes, estimated blood loss of 106.7±11.5mL, prostate weight of the surgical specimen of 106.3±8 grams and 1 day of length of stay. No continuous bladder irrigation was required and there was no complication. The mean postoperative PSA and IPSS were 0.7±0.3ng/mL, 4.7±1.5. The maximum urine flow raised to 20±4.4mL/seg. CONCLUSIONS: RASP with vesico-urethral anastomosis allowed minimal blood loss, short length of stay and great functional outcomes. All the three approaches allowed to perform this technique in a safe way, while showing different alternatives to reach the adenoma. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2020-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7993952/ /pubmed/33621025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0744 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Video Section
Rodrigues, Gilberto J.
Sawczyn, Guilherme V.
Guglielmetti, Giuliano B.
Fazoli, Arnaldo J. C.
Tanure, Luís H. R.
Nahas, William C.
Coelho, Rafael F.
Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: the evolution of a surgical technique
title Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: the evolution of a surgical technique
title_full Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: the evolution of a surgical technique
title_fullStr Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: the evolution of a surgical technique
title_full_unstemmed Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: the evolution of a surgical technique
title_short Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: the evolution of a surgical technique
title_sort robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: the evolution of a surgical technique
topic Video Section
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7993952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33621025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0744
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguesgilbertoj robotassistedsimpleprostatectomytheevolutionofasurgicaltechnique
AT sawczynguilhermev robotassistedsimpleprostatectomytheevolutionofasurgicaltechnique
AT guglielmettigiulianob robotassistedsimpleprostatectomytheevolutionofasurgicaltechnique
AT fazoliarnaldojc robotassistedsimpleprostatectomytheevolutionofasurgicaltechnique
AT tanureluishr robotassistedsimpleprostatectomytheevolutionofasurgicaltechnique
AT nahaswilliamc robotassistedsimpleprostatectomytheevolutionofasurgicaltechnique
AT coelhorafaelf robotassistedsimpleprostatectomytheevolutionofasurgicaltechnique