Cargando…

Proteomic research and diagnosis in bladder cancer: state of the art review

PURPOSE: Proteomic biomarkers have been emerging as alternative methods to the gold standard procedures of cystoscopy and urine cytology in the diagnosis and surveillance of bladder cancer (BC). This review aims to update the state of the art of proteomics research and diagnosis in BC. MATERIALS AND...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Jorge Luis, Antoniassi, Mariana Pereira, Lopes, Paula Intasqui, Azevedo, Hatylas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7993960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32459456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.99.02
_version_ 1783669664374587392
author Wilson, Jorge Luis
Antoniassi, Mariana Pereira
Lopes, Paula Intasqui
Azevedo, Hatylas
author_facet Wilson, Jorge Luis
Antoniassi, Mariana Pereira
Lopes, Paula Intasqui
Azevedo, Hatylas
author_sort Wilson, Jorge Luis
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Proteomic biomarkers have been emerging as alternative methods to the gold standard procedures of cystoscopy and urine cytology in the diagnosis and surveillance of bladder cancer (BC). This review aims to update the state of the art of proteomics research and diagnosis in BC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the current literature related to BC research on urinary, tissue, blood and cell line proteomics, using the Pubmed database. FINDINGS: Two urinary protein biomarkers are FDA-approved (NMP22® and BTA® tests), only if performed along with cystoscopy for surveillance after initial diagnosis, but not in the primary diagnostic setting due to high false-positive rates in case of infections, stones and hematuria. There are a great number of non-FDA approved proteins being studied, with good preliminary results; panels of proteins seem valuable tools to be refined in ongoing trials. Blood proteins are a bigger challenge, because of the complexity of the serum protein profile and the scarcity of blood proteomic studies in BC. Previous studies with the BC tissue proteome do not correlate well with the urinary proteome, likely due to the tumor heterogeneity. Cell line proteomic research helps in the understanding of basic mechanisms that drive BC development and progression; the main difficulty is culturing low-grade tumors in vitro, which represents the majority of BC tumors in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Protein biomarkers have promising value in the diagnosis, surveillance and prognostic of BC. Urine is the most appropriate body fluid for biomarker research in BC due to its easiness of sampling, stability and enrichment of shed and secreted tumor-specific proteins. Panels of biomarkers may exhibit higher sensitivity than single proteins in the diagnosis of BC at larger populations due to clinical and tumor heterogeneity. Prospective clinical trials are warranted to validate the relevance of proteomic data in the clinical management of BC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7993960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79939602021-03-27 Proteomic research and diagnosis in bladder cancer: state of the art review Wilson, Jorge Luis Antoniassi, Mariana Pereira Lopes, Paula Intasqui Azevedo, Hatylas Int Braz J Urol Review Article PURPOSE: Proteomic biomarkers have been emerging as alternative methods to the gold standard procedures of cystoscopy and urine cytology in the diagnosis and surveillance of bladder cancer (BC). This review aims to update the state of the art of proteomics research and diagnosis in BC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the current literature related to BC research on urinary, tissue, blood and cell line proteomics, using the Pubmed database. FINDINGS: Two urinary protein biomarkers are FDA-approved (NMP22® and BTA® tests), only if performed along with cystoscopy for surveillance after initial diagnosis, but not in the primary diagnostic setting due to high false-positive rates in case of infections, stones and hematuria. There are a great number of non-FDA approved proteins being studied, with good preliminary results; panels of proteins seem valuable tools to be refined in ongoing trials. Blood proteins are a bigger challenge, because of the complexity of the serum protein profile and the scarcity of blood proteomic studies in BC. Previous studies with the BC tissue proteome do not correlate well with the urinary proteome, likely due to the tumor heterogeneity. Cell line proteomic research helps in the understanding of basic mechanisms that drive BC development and progression; the main difficulty is culturing low-grade tumors in vitro, which represents the majority of BC tumors in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Protein biomarkers have promising value in the diagnosis, surveillance and prognostic of BC. Urine is the most appropriate body fluid for biomarker research in BC due to its easiness of sampling, stability and enrichment of shed and secreted tumor-specific proteins. Panels of biomarkers may exhibit higher sensitivity than single proteins in the diagnosis of BC at larger populations due to clinical and tumor heterogeneity. Prospective clinical trials are warranted to validate the relevance of proteomic data in the clinical management of BC. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2020-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7993960/ /pubmed/32459456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.99.02 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Wilson, Jorge Luis
Antoniassi, Mariana Pereira
Lopes, Paula Intasqui
Azevedo, Hatylas
Proteomic research and diagnosis in bladder cancer: state of the art review
title Proteomic research and diagnosis in bladder cancer: state of the art review
title_full Proteomic research and diagnosis in bladder cancer: state of the art review
title_fullStr Proteomic research and diagnosis in bladder cancer: state of the art review
title_full_unstemmed Proteomic research and diagnosis in bladder cancer: state of the art review
title_short Proteomic research and diagnosis in bladder cancer: state of the art review
title_sort proteomic research and diagnosis in bladder cancer: state of the art review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7993960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32459456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.99.02
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonjorgeluis proteomicresearchanddiagnosisinbladdercancerstateoftheartreview
AT antoniassimarianapereira proteomicresearchanddiagnosisinbladdercancerstateoftheartreview
AT lopespaulaintasqui proteomicresearchanddiagnosisinbladdercancerstateoftheartreview
AT azevedohatylas proteomicresearchanddiagnosisinbladdercancerstateoftheartreview