Cargando…

Patients with encrusted ureteral stents can be treated by a single session combined endourological approach

PURPOSE: To describe our experience in the management of retained encrusted ureteral stents using a single session combined endourological approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with retained encrusted ureteral stents who had been submitted to a single session combined endourological approach fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lopes, Roberto Iglesias, Perrella, Rodrigo, Watanabe, Carlos Hirokatsu, Beltrame, Fabricio, Danilovic, Alexandre, Murta, Claudio Bovolenta, Claro, Joaquim Francisco de Almeida, Vicentini, Fabio Carvalho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7993973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33621006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0511
_version_ 1783669667409166336
author Lopes, Roberto Iglesias
Perrella, Rodrigo
Watanabe, Carlos Hirokatsu
Beltrame, Fabricio
Danilovic, Alexandre
Murta, Claudio Bovolenta
Claro, Joaquim Francisco de Almeida
Vicentini, Fabio Carvalho
author_facet Lopes, Roberto Iglesias
Perrella, Rodrigo
Watanabe, Carlos Hirokatsu
Beltrame, Fabricio
Danilovic, Alexandre
Murta, Claudio Bovolenta
Claro, Joaquim Francisco de Almeida
Vicentini, Fabio Carvalho
author_sort Lopes, Roberto Iglesias
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To describe our experience in the management of retained encrusted ureteral stents using a single session combined endourological approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with retained encrusted ureteral stents who had been submitted to a single session combined endourological approach from June 2010 to June 2018 were prospectively evaluated. Patients were divided according to the Forgotten-Encrusted-Calcified (FECal) classification. The stone burden, surgical intervention, number of interventions until stone free status, operation time, hospital stay, complications, stone analysis, and stone-free rate were compared between groups. ANOVA was used to compare numerical variables, and the Mann-Whitney or Chi-square test to compare categorical variables between groups. RESULTS: We evaluated 50 patients with a mean follow-up of 2.9±1.4 years (mean±SD). The groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, laterality, BMI, comorbidities, ASA, reason for stent passage, and indwelling time. The stone burden was higher for grades IV and V (p=0.027). Percutaneous nephrolithotomy was the most common procedure (p=0.004) for grades IV and V. The number of procedures until the patients were stone-free was 1.92±1.40, and the hospital stay (4.2±2.5 days), complications (22%), and stone analysis (66% calcium oxalate) were similar between groups. The stone-free rate was lower in grades III to V (60%, 54.5%, and 50%). CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic combined approach in the supine position is a safe and feasible technique that allows removal of retained and encrusted stents in a single procedure. The FECal classification seems to be useful for surgical planning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7993973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79939732021-03-27 Patients with encrusted ureteral stents can be treated by a single session combined endourological approach Lopes, Roberto Iglesias Perrella, Rodrigo Watanabe, Carlos Hirokatsu Beltrame, Fabricio Danilovic, Alexandre Murta, Claudio Bovolenta Claro, Joaquim Francisco de Almeida Vicentini, Fabio Carvalho Int Braz J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: To describe our experience in the management of retained encrusted ureteral stents using a single session combined endourological approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with retained encrusted ureteral stents who had been submitted to a single session combined endourological approach from June 2010 to June 2018 were prospectively evaluated. Patients were divided according to the Forgotten-Encrusted-Calcified (FECal) classification. The stone burden, surgical intervention, number of interventions until stone free status, operation time, hospital stay, complications, stone analysis, and stone-free rate were compared between groups. ANOVA was used to compare numerical variables, and the Mann-Whitney or Chi-square test to compare categorical variables between groups. RESULTS: We evaluated 50 patients with a mean follow-up of 2.9±1.4 years (mean±SD). The groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, laterality, BMI, comorbidities, ASA, reason for stent passage, and indwelling time. The stone burden was higher for grades IV and V (p=0.027). Percutaneous nephrolithotomy was the most common procedure (p=0.004) for grades IV and V. The number of procedures until the patients were stone-free was 1.92±1.40, and the hospital stay (4.2±2.5 days), complications (22%), and stone analysis (66% calcium oxalate) were similar between groups. The stone-free rate was lower in grades III to V (60%, 54.5%, and 50%). CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic combined approach in the supine position is a safe and feasible technique that allows removal of retained and encrusted stents in a single procedure. The FECal classification seems to be useful for surgical planning. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2020-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7993973/ /pubmed/33621006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0511 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lopes, Roberto Iglesias
Perrella, Rodrigo
Watanabe, Carlos Hirokatsu
Beltrame, Fabricio
Danilovic, Alexandre
Murta, Claudio Bovolenta
Claro, Joaquim Francisco de Almeida
Vicentini, Fabio Carvalho
Patients with encrusted ureteral stents can be treated by a single session combined endourological approach
title Patients with encrusted ureteral stents can be treated by a single session combined endourological approach
title_full Patients with encrusted ureteral stents can be treated by a single session combined endourological approach
title_fullStr Patients with encrusted ureteral stents can be treated by a single session combined endourological approach
title_full_unstemmed Patients with encrusted ureteral stents can be treated by a single session combined endourological approach
title_short Patients with encrusted ureteral stents can be treated by a single session combined endourological approach
title_sort patients with encrusted ureteral stents can be treated by a single session combined endourological approach
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7993973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33621006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0511
work_keys_str_mv AT lopesrobertoiglesias patientswithencrustedureteralstentscanbetreatedbyasinglesessioncombinedendourologicalapproach
AT perrellarodrigo patientswithencrustedureteralstentscanbetreatedbyasinglesessioncombinedendourologicalapproach
AT watanabecarloshirokatsu patientswithencrustedureteralstentscanbetreatedbyasinglesessioncombinedendourologicalapproach
AT beltramefabricio patientswithencrustedureteralstentscanbetreatedbyasinglesessioncombinedendourologicalapproach
AT danilovicalexandre patientswithencrustedureteralstentscanbetreatedbyasinglesessioncombinedendourologicalapproach
AT murtaclaudiobovolenta patientswithencrustedureteralstentscanbetreatedbyasinglesessioncombinedendourologicalapproach
AT clarojoaquimfranciscodealmeida patientswithencrustedureteralstentscanbetreatedbyasinglesessioncombinedendourologicalapproach
AT vicentinifabiocarvalho patientswithencrustedureteralstentscanbetreatedbyasinglesessioncombinedendourologicalapproach