Cargando…
Testing olfactory dysfunction in acute and recovered COVID-19 patients: a single center study in Italy
BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is common during acute illness and appears to last longer than other symptoms. The aim of this study was to objectively investigate olfactory dysfunction in two cohorts of patients at two different stages: during acute illness...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33768438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05200-7 |
_version_ | 1783669684262928384 |
---|---|
author | Pasquini, Jacopo Maremmani, Carlo Salvadori, Stefano Silani, Vincenzo Ticozzi, Nicola |
author_facet | Pasquini, Jacopo Maremmani, Carlo Salvadori, Stefano Silani, Vincenzo Ticozzi, Nicola |
author_sort | Pasquini, Jacopo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is common during acute illness and appears to last longer than other symptoms. The aim of this study was to objectively investigate olfactory dysfunction in two cohorts of patients at two different stages: during acute illness and after a median recovery of 4 months. METHODS: Twenty-five acutely ill patients and 26 recovered subjects were investigated. Acute patients had a molecular diagnosis of COVID-19; recovered subjects had a positive antibody assay and a negative molecular test. A 33-item psychophysical olfactory identification test tailored for the Italian population was performed. RESULTS: Median time from symptoms onset to olfactory test was 33 days in acute patients and 122 days in recovered subjects. The former scored a significantly higher number of errors at psychophysical testing (median [IQR]: 8 [13] vs 3 [2], p < 0.001) and were more frequently hyposmic (64% vs 19%, p = 0.002). Recovered subjects reported a variable time to subjective olfactory recovery, from days up to 4 months. Participants included in the study reported no significant nasal symptoms at olfactory testing. Among recovered subject who reported olfactory loss during acute COVID-19, four (27%) were still hyposmic. Demographic and clinical characteristics did not show significant associations with olfactory dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Moderate-to-severe hospitalized patients showed a high level and frequency of olfactory dysfunction compared to recovered subjects. In the latter group, subjects who reported persisting olfactory dysfunction showed abnormal scores on psychophysical testing, indicating that, at least in some subjects, persistent hyposmia may represent a long-term sequela of COVID-19. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10072-021-05200-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7994059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79940592021-03-26 Testing olfactory dysfunction in acute and recovered COVID-19 patients: a single center study in Italy Pasquini, Jacopo Maremmani, Carlo Salvadori, Stefano Silani, Vincenzo Ticozzi, Nicola Neurol Sci Covid-19 BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is common during acute illness and appears to last longer than other symptoms. The aim of this study was to objectively investigate olfactory dysfunction in two cohorts of patients at two different stages: during acute illness and after a median recovery of 4 months. METHODS: Twenty-five acutely ill patients and 26 recovered subjects were investigated. Acute patients had a molecular diagnosis of COVID-19; recovered subjects had a positive antibody assay and a negative molecular test. A 33-item psychophysical olfactory identification test tailored for the Italian population was performed. RESULTS: Median time from symptoms onset to olfactory test was 33 days in acute patients and 122 days in recovered subjects. The former scored a significantly higher number of errors at psychophysical testing (median [IQR]: 8 [13] vs 3 [2], p < 0.001) and were more frequently hyposmic (64% vs 19%, p = 0.002). Recovered subjects reported a variable time to subjective olfactory recovery, from days up to 4 months. Participants included in the study reported no significant nasal symptoms at olfactory testing. Among recovered subject who reported olfactory loss during acute COVID-19, four (27%) were still hyposmic. Demographic and clinical characteristics did not show significant associations with olfactory dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Moderate-to-severe hospitalized patients showed a high level and frequency of olfactory dysfunction compared to recovered subjects. In the latter group, subjects who reported persisting olfactory dysfunction showed abnormal scores on psychophysical testing, indicating that, at least in some subjects, persistent hyposmia may represent a long-term sequela of COVID-19. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10072-021-05200-7. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7994059/ /pubmed/33768438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05200-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Covid-19 Pasquini, Jacopo Maremmani, Carlo Salvadori, Stefano Silani, Vincenzo Ticozzi, Nicola Testing olfactory dysfunction in acute and recovered COVID-19 patients: a single center study in Italy |
title | Testing olfactory dysfunction in acute and recovered COVID-19 patients: a single center study in Italy |
title_full | Testing olfactory dysfunction in acute and recovered COVID-19 patients: a single center study in Italy |
title_fullStr | Testing olfactory dysfunction in acute and recovered COVID-19 patients: a single center study in Italy |
title_full_unstemmed | Testing olfactory dysfunction in acute and recovered COVID-19 patients: a single center study in Italy |
title_short | Testing olfactory dysfunction in acute and recovered COVID-19 patients: a single center study in Italy |
title_sort | testing olfactory dysfunction in acute and recovered covid-19 patients: a single center study in italy |
topic | Covid-19 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33768438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05200-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pasquinijacopo testingolfactorydysfunctioninacuteandrecoveredcovid19patientsasinglecenterstudyinitaly AT maremmanicarlo testingolfactorydysfunctioninacuteandrecoveredcovid19patientsasinglecenterstudyinitaly AT salvadoristefano testingolfactorydysfunctioninacuteandrecoveredcovid19patientsasinglecenterstudyinitaly AT silanivincenzo testingolfactorydysfunctioninacuteandrecoveredcovid19patientsasinglecenterstudyinitaly AT ticozzinicola testingolfactorydysfunctioninacuteandrecoveredcovid19patientsasinglecenterstudyinitaly |