Cargando…

Testing olfactory dysfunction in acute and recovered COVID-19 patients: a single center study in Italy

BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is common during acute illness and appears to last longer than other symptoms. The aim of this study was to objectively investigate olfactory dysfunction in two cohorts of patients at two different stages: during acute illness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pasquini, Jacopo, Maremmani, Carlo, Salvadori, Stefano, Silani, Vincenzo, Ticozzi, Nicola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33768438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05200-7
_version_ 1783669684262928384
author Pasquini, Jacopo
Maremmani, Carlo
Salvadori, Stefano
Silani, Vincenzo
Ticozzi, Nicola
author_facet Pasquini, Jacopo
Maremmani, Carlo
Salvadori, Stefano
Silani, Vincenzo
Ticozzi, Nicola
author_sort Pasquini, Jacopo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is common during acute illness and appears to last longer than other symptoms. The aim of this study was to objectively investigate olfactory dysfunction in two cohorts of patients at two different stages: during acute illness and after a median recovery of 4 months. METHODS: Twenty-five acutely ill patients and 26 recovered subjects were investigated. Acute patients had a molecular diagnosis of COVID-19; recovered subjects had a positive antibody assay and a negative molecular test. A 33-item psychophysical olfactory identification test tailored for the Italian population was performed. RESULTS: Median time from symptoms onset to olfactory test was 33 days in acute patients and 122 days in recovered subjects. The former scored a significantly higher number of errors at psychophysical testing (median [IQR]: 8 [13] vs 3 [2], p < 0.001) and were more frequently hyposmic (64% vs 19%, p = 0.002). Recovered subjects reported a variable time to subjective olfactory recovery, from days up to 4 months. Participants included in the study reported no significant nasal symptoms at olfactory testing. Among recovered subject who reported olfactory loss during acute COVID-19, four (27%) were still hyposmic. Demographic and clinical characteristics did not show significant associations with olfactory dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Moderate-to-severe hospitalized patients showed a high level and frequency of olfactory dysfunction compared to recovered subjects. In the latter group, subjects who reported persisting olfactory dysfunction showed abnormal scores on psychophysical testing, indicating that, at least in some subjects, persistent hyposmia may represent a long-term sequela of COVID-19. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10072-021-05200-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7994059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79940592021-03-26 Testing olfactory dysfunction in acute and recovered COVID-19 patients: a single center study in Italy Pasquini, Jacopo Maremmani, Carlo Salvadori, Stefano Silani, Vincenzo Ticozzi, Nicola Neurol Sci Covid-19 BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is common during acute illness and appears to last longer than other symptoms. The aim of this study was to objectively investigate olfactory dysfunction in two cohorts of patients at two different stages: during acute illness and after a median recovery of 4 months. METHODS: Twenty-five acutely ill patients and 26 recovered subjects were investigated. Acute patients had a molecular diagnosis of COVID-19; recovered subjects had a positive antibody assay and a negative molecular test. A 33-item psychophysical olfactory identification test tailored for the Italian population was performed. RESULTS: Median time from symptoms onset to olfactory test was 33 days in acute patients and 122 days in recovered subjects. The former scored a significantly higher number of errors at psychophysical testing (median [IQR]: 8 [13] vs 3 [2], p < 0.001) and were more frequently hyposmic (64% vs 19%, p = 0.002). Recovered subjects reported a variable time to subjective olfactory recovery, from days up to 4 months. Participants included in the study reported no significant nasal symptoms at olfactory testing. Among recovered subject who reported olfactory loss during acute COVID-19, four (27%) were still hyposmic. Demographic and clinical characteristics did not show significant associations with olfactory dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Moderate-to-severe hospitalized patients showed a high level and frequency of olfactory dysfunction compared to recovered subjects. In the latter group, subjects who reported persisting olfactory dysfunction showed abnormal scores on psychophysical testing, indicating that, at least in some subjects, persistent hyposmia may represent a long-term sequela of COVID-19. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10072-021-05200-7. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7994059/ /pubmed/33768438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05200-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Covid-19
Pasquini, Jacopo
Maremmani, Carlo
Salvadori, Stefano
Silani, Vincenzo
Ticozzi, Nicola
Testing olfactory dysfunction in acute and recovered COVID-19 patients: a single center study in Italy
title Testing olfactory dysfunction in acute and recovered COVID-19 patients: a single center study in Italy
title_full Testing olfactory dysfunction in acute and recovered COVID-19 patients: a single center study in Italy
title_fullStr Testing olfactory dysfunction in acute and recovered COVID-19 patients: a single center study in Italy
title_full_unstemmed Testing olfactory dysfunction in acute and recovered COVID-19 patients: a single center study in Italy
title_short Testing olfactory dysfunction in acute and recovered COVID-19 patients: a single center study in Italy
title_sort testing olfactory dysfunction in acute and recovered covid-19 patients: a single center study in italy
topic Covid-19
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33768438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05200-7
work_keys_str_mv AT pasquinijacopo testingolfactorydysfunctioninacuteandrecoveredcovid19patientsasinglecenterstudyinitaly
AT maremmanicarlo testingolfactorydysfunctioninacuteandrecoveredcovid19patientsasinglecenterstudyinitaly
AT salvadoristefano testingolfactorydysfunctioninacuteandrecoveredcovid19patientsasinglecenterstudyinitaly
AT silanivincenzo testingolfactorydysfunctioninacuteandrecoveredcovid19patientsasinglecenterstudyinitaly
AT ticozzinicola testingolfactorydysfunctioninacuteandrecoveredcovid19patientsasinglecenterstudyinitaly