Cargando…

Who Is a Pathologist According to Oncology Patients and Internet Users? A Survey Study

The pathologist is frequently called “the doctor’s doctor.” However, there are many uncertainties about the role of a pathologist among patients and policymakers and even among other medical specialties. The aim of the current study is to analyze the misconceptions of who a pathologist is among inpa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kunc, Michał, Miszewski, Kevin, Bieńkowski, Michał, Kamieniecki, Alexandra, Ekman, Marcin, Gorczyński, Adam, Biernat, Wojciech
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31667680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01640-0
_version_ 1783669707895734272
author Kunc, Michał
Miszewski, Kevin
Bieńkowski, Michał
Kamieniecki, Alexandra
Ekman, Marcin
Gorczyński, Adam
Biernat, Wojciech
author_facet Kunc, Michał
Miszewski, Kevin
Bieńkowski, Michał
Kamieniecki, Alexandra
Ekman, Marcin
Gorczyński, Adam
Biernat, Wojciech
author_sort Kunc, Michał
collection PubMed
description The pathologist is frequently called “the doctor’s doctor.” However, there are many uncertainties about the role of a pathologist among patients and policymakers and even among other medical specialties. The aim of the current study is to analyze the misconceptions of who a pathologist is among inpatients and Internet users, to find where the lack of understanding is originating from, and to confirm the need to educate the general public about pathologists. The survey of Internet users was conducted among Facebook users, utilizing the snowball sampling method. Inpatients were randomly recruited in the Department of Surgical Oncology. Seventy-eight inpatients and 320 Internet users were enrolled in the study. Significantly, more hospital patients than Internet users answered that the pathologist is not an MD (p = 0.00953). A portion of participants stated that pathologists do not make diagnoses (n = 28, 7.03%) and do not influence the treatment plan (n = 37, 9.30%) and that the other specialists do not gain anything from the pathologist’s work (n = 67, 16.83%). Only 15.07% of respondents had their information about pathologists from other doctors. The findings from this study should show that even the most basic knowledge of a pathologist being an MD is not known. Pathologists are not recognized for being involved in the diagnosis of diseases. This should provide an incentive to pathologists to teach future doctors, policymakers, and patients about the perplexity of the pathology specialty. It shows obvious gaps in the knowledge of the treatment process as a whole.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7994219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79942192021-04-16 Who Is a Pathologist According to Oncology Patients and Internet Users? A Survey Study Kunc, Michał Miszewski, Kevin Bieńkowski, Michał Kamieniecki, Alexandra Ekman, Marcin Gorczyński, Adam Biernat, Wojciech J Cancer Educ Article The pathologist is frequently called “the doctor’s doctor.” However, there are many uncertainties about the role of a pathologist among patients and policymakers and even among other medical specialties. The aim of the current study is to analyze the misconceptions of who a pathologist is among inpatients and Internet users, to find where the lack of understanding is originating from, and to confirm the need to educate the general public about pathologists. The survey of Internet users was conducted among Facebook users, utilizing the snowball sampling method. Inpatients were randomly recruited in the Department of Surgical Oncology. Seventy-eight inpatients and 320 Internet users were enrolled in the study. Significantly, more hospital patients than Internet users answered that the pathologist is not an MD (p = 0.00953). A portion of participants stated that pathologists do not make diagnoses (n = 28, 7.03%) and do not influence the treatment plan (n = 37, 9.30%) and that the other specialists do not gain anything from the pathologist’s work (n = 67, 16.83%). Only 15.07% of respondents had their information about pathologists from other doctors. The findings from this study should show that even the most basic knowledge of a pathologist being an MD is not known. Pathologists are not recognized for being involved in the diagnosis of diseases. This should provide an incentive to pathologists to teach future doctors, policymakers, and patients about the perplexity of the pathology specialty. It shows obvious gaps in the knowledge of the treatment process as a whole. Springer US 2019-10-30 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7994219/ /pubmed/31667680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01640-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Kunc, Michał
Miszewski, Kevin
Bieńkowski, Michał
Kamieniecki, Alexandra
Ekman, Marcin
Gorczyński, Adam
Biernat, Wojciech
Who Is a Pathologist According to Oncology Patients and Internet Users? A Survey Study
title Who Is a Pathologist According to Oncology Patients and Internet Users? A Survey Study
title_full Who Is a Pathologist According to Oncology Patients and Internet Users? A Survey Study
title_fullStr Who Is a Pathologist According to Oncology Patients and Internet Users? A Survey Study
title_full_unstemmed Who Is a Pathologist According to Oncology Patients and Internet Users? A Survey Study
title_short Who Is a Pathologist According to Oncology Patients and Internet Users? A Survey Study
title_sort who is a pathologist according to oncology patients and internet users? a survey study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31667680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01640-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kuncmichał whoisapathologistaccordingtooncologypatientsandinternetusersasurveystudy
AT miszewskikevin whoisapathologistaccordingtooncologypatientsandinternetusersasurveystudy
AT bienkowskimichał whoisapathologistaccordingtooncologypatientsandinternetusersasurveystudy
AT kamienieckialexandra whoisapathologistaccordingtooncologypatientsandinternetusersasurveystudy
AT ekmanmarcin whoisapathologistaccordingtooncologypatientsandinternetusersasurveystudy
AT gorczynskiadam whoisapathologistaccordingtooncologypatientsandinternetusersasurveystudy
AT biernatwojciech whoisapathologistaccordingtooncologypatientsandinternetusersasurveystudy