Cargando…

Qualitative similarities and differences in visual object representations between brains and deep networks

Deep neural networks have revolutionized computer vision, and their object representations across layers match coarsely with visual cortical areas in the brain. However, whether these representations exhibit qualitative patterns seen in human perception or brain representations remains unresolved. H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacob, Georgin, Pramod, R. T., Katti, Harish, Arun, S. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33767141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22078-3
_version_ 1783669727518785536
author Jacob, Georgin
Pramod, R. T.
Katti, Harish
Arun, S. P.
author_facet Jacob, Georgin
Pramod, R. T.
Katti, Harish
Arun, S. P.
author_sort Jacob, Georgin
collection PubMed
description Deep neural networks have revolutionized computer vision, and their object representations across layers match coarsely with visual cortical areas in the brain. However, whether these representations exhibit qualitative patterns seen in human perception or brain representations remains unresolved. Here, we recast well-known perceptual and neural phenomena in terms of distance comparisons, and ask whether they are present in feedforward deep neural networks trained for object recognition. Some phenomena were present in randomly initialized networks, such as the global advantage effect, sparseness, and relative size. Many others were present after object recognition training, such as the Thatcher effect, mirror confusion, Weber’s law, relative size, multiple object normalization and correlated sparseness. Yet other phenomena were absent in trained networks, such as 3D shape processing, surface invariance, occlusion, natural parts and the global advantage. These findings indicate sufficient conditions for the emergence of these phenomena in brains and deep networks, and offer clues to the properties that could be incorporated to improve deep networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7994307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79943072021-04-16 Qualitative similarities and differences in visual object representations between brains and deep networks Jacob, Georgin Pramod, R. T. Katti, Harish Arun, S. P. Nat Commun Article Deep neural networks have revolutionized computer vision, and their object representations across layers match coarsely with visual cortical areas in the brain. However, whether these representations exhibit qualitative patterns seen in human perception or brain representations remains unresolved. Here, we recast well-known perceptual and neural phenomena in terms of distance comparisons, and ask whether they are present in feedforward deep neural networks trained for object recognition. Some phenomena were present in randomly initialized networks, such as the global advantage effect, sparseness, and relative size. Many others were present after object recognition training, such as the Thatcher effect, mirror confusion, Weber’s law, relative size, multiple object normalization and correlated sparseness. Yet other phenomena were absent in trained networks, such as 3D shape processing, surface invariance, occlusion, natural parts and the global advantage. These findings indicate sufficient conditions for the emergence of these phenomena in brains and deep networks, and offer clues to the properties that could be incorporated to improve deep networks. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7994307/ /pubmed/33767141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22078-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Jacob, Georgin
Pramod, R. T.
Katti, Harish
Arun, S. P.
Qualitative similarities and differences in visual object representations between brains and deep networks
title Qualitative similarities and differences in visual object representations between brains and deep networks
title_full Qualitative similarities and differences in visual object representations between brains and deep networks
title_fullStr Qualitative similarities and differences in visual object representations between brains and deep networks
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative similarities and differences in visual object representations between brains and deep networks
title_short Qualitative similarities and differences in visual object representations between brains and deep networks
title_sort qualitative similarities and differences in visual object representations between brains and deep networks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33767141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22078-3
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobgeorgin qualitativesimilaritiesanddifferencesinvisualobjectrepresentationsbetweenbrainsanddeepnetworks
AT pramodrt qualitativesimilaritiesanddifferencesinvisualobjectrepresentationsbetweenbrainsanddeepnetworks
AT kattiharish qualitativesimilaritiesanddifferencesinvisualobjectrepresentationsbetweenbrainsanddeepnetworks
AT arunsp qualitativesimilaritiesanddifferencesinvisualobjectrepresentationsbetweenbrainsanddeepnetworks