Cargando…

De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer

In the modern era, highly effective anti-HER2 therapy is associated with low local-regional recurrence (LRR) rates for early-stage HER2+ breast cancer raising the question of whether local therapy de-escalation by radiation omission is possible in patients with small-node negative tumors treated wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bazan, Jose G., Jhawar, Sachin R., Stover, Daniel, Park, Ko Un, Beyer, Sasha, Healy, Erin, White, Julia R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33767168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00242-8
_version_ 1783669749093236736
author Bazan, Jose G.
Jhawar, Sachin R.
Stover, Daniel
Park, Ko Un
Beyer, Sasha
Healy, Erin
White, Julia R.
author_facet Bazan, Jose G.
Jhawar, Sachin R.
Stover, Daniel
Park, Ko Un
Beyer, Sasha
Healy, Erin
White, Julia R.
author_sort Bazan, Jose G.
collection PubMed
description In the modern era, highly effective anti-HER2 therapy is associated with low local-regional recurrence (LRR) rates for early-stage HER2+ breast cancer raising the question of whether local therapy de-escalation by radiation omission is possible in patients with small-node negative tumors treated with lumpectomy. To evaluate existing data on radiation omission, we used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to test the hypothesis that RT omission results in equivalent overall survival (OS) in stage 1 (T1N0) HER2+ breast cancer. We excluded patients that received neoadjuvant systemic therapy. We stratified the cohort by receipt of adjuvant radiation. We identified 6897 patients (6388 RT; 509 no RT). Patients that did not receive radiation tended to be ≥70 years-old (odds ratio [OR] = 3.69, 95% CI: 3.02–4.51, p < 0.0001), to have ≥1 comorbidity (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.06–1.68, p = 0.0154), to be Hispanic (OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.00–2.22, p = 0.049), and to live in lower income areas (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07–1.64, p = 0.0266). Radiation omission was associated with a 3.67-fold (95% CI: 2.23–6.02, p < 0.0001) increased risk of death. While other selection biases that influence radiation omission likely persist, these data should give caution to radiation omission in T1N0 HER2+ breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7994398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79943982021-04-16 De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer Bazan, Jose G. Jhawar, Sachin R. Stover, Daniel Park, Ko Un Beyer, Sasha Healy, Erin White, Julia R. NPJ Breast Cancer Article In the modern era, highly effective anti-HER2 therapy is associated with low local-regional recurrence (LRR) rates for early-stage HER2+ breast cancer raising the question of whether local therapy de-escalation by radiation omission is possible in patients with small-node negative tumors treated with lumpectomy. To evaluate existing data on radiation omission, we used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to test the hypothesis that RT omission results in equivalent overall survival (OS) in stage 1 (T1N0) HER2+ breast cancer. We excluded patients that received neoadjuvant systemic therapy. We stratified the cohort by receipt of adjuvant radiation. We identified 6897 patients (6388 RT; 509 no RT). Patients that did not receive radiation tended to be ≥70 years-old (odds ratio [OR] = 3.69, 95% CI: 3.02–4.51, p < 0.0001), to have ≥1 comorbidity (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.06–1.68, p = 0.0154), to be Hispanic (OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.00–2.22, p = 0.049), and to live in lower income areas (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07–1.64, p = 0.0266). Radiation omission was associated with a 3.67-fold (95% CI: 2.23–6.02, p < 0.0001) increased risk of death. While other selection biases that influence radiation omission likely persist, these data should give caution to radiation omission in T1N0 HER2+ breast cancer. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7994398/ /pubmed/33767168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00242-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Bazan, Jose G.
Jhawar, Sachin R.
Stover, Daniel
Park, Ko Un
Beyer, Sasha
Healy, Erin
White, Julia R.
De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer
title De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer
title_full De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer
title_fullStr De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer
title_short De-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage I, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer
title_sort de-escalation of radiation therapy in patients with stage i, node-negative, her2-positive breast cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33767168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00242-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bazanjoseg deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer
AT jhawarsachinr deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer
AT stoverdaniel deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer
AT parkkoun deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer
AT beyersasha deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer
AT healyerin deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer
AT whitejuliar deescalationofradiationtherapyinpatientswithstageinodenegativeher2positivebreastcancer