Cargando…

Assessment of Geochemical Limitations to Utilizing CO(2) as a Cushion Gas in Compressed Energy Storage Systems

Compressed energy storage (CES) of air, CO(2), or H(2) in porous formations is a promising means of energy storage to abate the intermittency of renewable energy production. During operation, gas is injected during times of excess energy production and extracted during excess demands to drive turbin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iloejesi, Chidera O., Beckingham, Lauren E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ees.2020.0345
_version_ 1783669753951289344
author Iloejesi, Chidera O.
Beckingham, Lauren E.
author_facet Iloejesi, Chidera O.
Beckingham, Lauren E.
author_sort Iloejesi, Chidera O.
collection PubMed
description Compressed energy storage (CES) of air, CO(2), or H(2) in porous formations is a promising means of energy storage to abate the intermittency of renewable energy production. During operation, gas is injected during times of excess energy production and extracted during excess demands to drive turbines. Storage in saline aquifers using CO(2) as a cushion or working gas has numerous advantages over typical air storage in caverns. However, interactions between CO(2) and saline aquifers may result in potential operational limitations and have not been considered. This work utilizes reactive transport simulations to evaluate the geochemical reactions that occur during injection and extraction operational cycles for CES in a porous formation using CO(2) as a cushion gas. Simulation results are compared with similar simulations considering an injection-only flow regime of geologic CO(2) storage. Once injected, CO(2) creates conditions favorable for dissolution of carbonate and aluminosilicate minerals. However, the dissolution extent is limited in the cyclic flow regime where significantly smaller dissolution occurs after the first cycle such that CO(2) is a viable choice of cushion gas. In the injection-only flow regime, larger extents of dissolution occur as the fluid continues to be undersaturated with respect to formation minerals throughout the study period and porosity increased uniformly from 24.84% to 33.6% throughout the simulation domain. For the cyclic flow conditions, porosity increases nonuniformly to 31.1% and 25.8% closest and furthest from the injection well, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7994420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79944202021-03-26 Assessment of Geochemical Limitations to Utilizing CO(2) as a Cushion Gas in Compressed Energy Storage Systems Iloejesi, Chidera O. Beckingham, Lauren E. Environ Eng Sci Articles Compressed energy storage (CES) of air, CO(2), or H(2) in porous formations is a promising means of energy storage to abate the intermittency of renewable energy production. During operation, gas is injected during times of excess energy production and extracted during excess demands to drive turbines. Storage in saline aquifers using CO(2) as a cushion or working gas has numerous advantages over typical air storage in caverns. However, interactions between CO(2) and saline aquifers may result in potential operational limitations and have not been considered. This work utilizes reactive transport simulations to evaluate the geochemical reactions that occur during injection and extraction operational cycles for CES in a porous formation using CO(2) as a cushion gas. Simulation results are compared with similar simulations considering an injection-only flow regime of geologic CO(2) storage. Once injected, CO(2) creates conditions favorable for dissolution of carbonate and aluminosilicate minerals. However, the dissolution extent is limited in the cyclic flow regime where significantly smaller dissolution occurs after the first cycle such that CO(2) is a viable choice of cushion gas. In the injection-only flow regime, larger extents of dissolution occur as the fluid continues to be undersaturated with respect to formation minerals throughout the study period and porosity increased uniformly from 24.84% to 33.6% throughout the simulation domain. For the cyclic flow conditions, porosity increases nonuniformly to 31.1% and 25.8% closest and furthest from the injection well, respectively. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021-03-01 2021-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7994420/ /pubmed/33776404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ees.2020.0345 Text en © Chidera O. Iloejesi and Lauren E. Beckingham 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Iloejesi, Chidera O.
Beckingham, Lauren E.
Assessment of Geochemical Limitations to Utilizing CO(2) as a Cushion Gas in Compressed Energy Storage Systems
title Assessment of Geochemical Limitations to Utilizing CO(2) as a Cushion Gas in Compressed Energy Storage Systems
title_full Assessment of Geochemical Limitations to Utilizing CO(2) as a Cushion Gas in Compressed Energy Storage Systems
title_fullStr Assessment of Geochemical Limitations to Utilizing CO(2) as a Cushion Gas in Compressed Energy Storage Systems
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Geochemical Limitations to Utilizing CO(2) as a Cushion Gas in Compressed Energy Storage Systems
title_short Assessment of Geochemical Limitations to Utilizing CO(2) as a Cushion Gas in Compressed Energy Storage Systems
title_sort assessment of geochemical limitations to utilizing co(2) as a cushion gas in compressed energy storage systems
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ees.2020.0345
work_keys_str_mv AT iloejesichiderao assessmentofgeochemicallimitationstoutilizingco2asacushiongasincompressedenergystoragesystems
AT beckinghamlaurene assessmentofgeochemicallimitationstoutilizingco2asacushiongasincompressedenergystoragesystems