Cargando…
eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants
With an accelerating negative impact of anthropogenic actions on natural ecosystems, non-invasive biodiversity assessments are becoming increasingly crucial. As a consequence, the interest in the application of environmental DNA (eDNA) survey techniques has increased. The use of eDNA extracted from...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33767219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85488-9 |
_version_ | 1783669757210263552 |
---|---|
author | Nørgaard, Louise Olesen, Carsten Riis Trøjelsgaard, Kristian Pertoldi, Cino Nielsen, Jeppe Lund Taberlet, Pierre Ruiz-González, Aritz De Barba, Marta Iacolina, Laura |
author_facet | Nørgaard, Louise Olesen, Carsten Riis Trøjelsgaard, Kristian Pertoldi, Cino Nielsen, Jeppe Lund Taberlet, Pierre Ruiz-González, Aritz De Barba, Marta Iacolina, Laura |
author_sort | Nørgaard, Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | With an accelerating negative impact of anthropogenic actions on natural ecosystems, non-invasive biodiversity assessments are becoming increasingly crucial. As a consequence, the interest in the application of environmental DNA (eDNA) survey techniques has increased. The use of eDNA extracted from faeces from generalist predators, have recently been described as “biodiversity capsules” and suggested as a complementary tool for improving current biodiversity assessments. In this study, using faecal samples from two generalist omnivore species, the Eurasian badger and the red fox, we evaluated the applicability of eDNA metabarcoding in determining dietary composition, compared to macroscopic diet identification techniques. Subsequently, we used the dietary information obtained to assess its contribution to biodiversity assessments. Compared to classic macroscopic techniques, we found that eDNA metabarcoding detected more taxa, at higher taxonomic resolution, and proved to be an important technique to verify the species identification of the predator from field collected faeces. Furthermore, we showed how dietary analyses complemented field observations in describing biodiversity by identifying consumed flora and fauna that went unnoticed during field observations. While diet analysis approaches could not substitute field observations entirely, we suggest that their integration with other methods might overcome intrinsic limitations of single techniques in future biodiversity surveys. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7994446 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79944462021-03-29 eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants Nørgaard, Louise Olesen, Carsten Riis Trøjelsgaard, Kristian Pertoldi, Cino Nielsen, Jeppe Lund Taberlet, Pierre Ruiz-González, Aritz De Barba, Marta Iacolina, Laura Sci Rep Article With an accelerating negative impact of anthropogenic actions on natural ecosystems, non-invasive biodiversity assessments are becoming increasingly crucial. As a consequence, the interest in the application of environmental DNA (eDNA) survey techniques has increased. The use of eDNA extracted from faeces from generalist predators, have recently been described as “biodiversity capsules” and suggested as a complementary tool for improving current biodiversity assessments. In this study, using faecal samples from two generalist omnivore species, the Eurasian badger and the red fox, we evaluated the applicability of eDNA metabarcoding in determining dietary composition, compared to macroscopic diet identification techniques. Subsequently, we used the dietary information obtained to assess its contribution to biodiversity assessments. Compared to classic macroscopic techniques, we found that eDNA metabarcoding detected more taxa, at higher taxonomic resolution, and proved to be an important technique to verify the species identification of the predator from field collected faeces. Furthermore, we showed how dietary analyses complemented field observations in describing biodiversity by identifying consumed flora and fauna that went unnoticed during field observations. While diet analysis approaches could not substitute field observations entirely, we suggest that their integration with other methods might overcome intrinsic limitations of single techniques in future biodiversity surveys. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7994446/ /pubmed/33767219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85488-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Nørgaard, Louise Olesen, Carsten Riis Trøjelsgaard, Kristian Pertoldi, Cino Nielsen, Jeppe Lund Taberlet, Pierre Ruiz-González, Aritz De Barba, Marta Iacolina, Laura eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants |
title | eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants |
title_full | eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants |
title_fullStr | eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants |
title_full_unstemmed | eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants |
title_short | eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants |
title_sort | edna metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33767219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85488-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nørgaardlouise ednametabarcodingforbiodiversityassessmentgeneralistpredatorsassamplingassistants AT olesencarstenriis ednametabarcodingforbiodiversityassessmentgeneralistpredatorsassamplingassistants AT trøjelsgaardkristian ednametabarcodingforbiodiversityassessmentgeneralistpredatorsassamplingassistants AT pertoldicino ednametabarcodingforbiodiversityassessmentgeneralistpredatorsassamplingassistants AT nielsenjeppelund ednametabarcodingforbiodiversityassessmentgeneralistpredatorsassamplingassistants AT taberletpierre ednametabarcodingforbiodiversityassessmentgeneralistpredatorsassamplingassistants AT ruizgonzalezaritz ednametabarcodingforbiodiversityassessmentgeneralistpredatorsassamplingassistants AT debarbamarta ednametabarcodingforbiodiversityassessmentgeneralistpredatorsassamplingassistants AT iacolinalaura ednametabarcodingforbiodiversityassessmentgeneralistpredatorsassamplingassistants |