Cargando…

eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants

With an accelerating negative impact of anthropogenic actions on natural ecosystems, non-invasive biodiversity assessments are becoming increasingly crucial. As a consequence, the interest in the application of environmental DNA (eDNA) survey techniques has increased. The use of eDNA extracted from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nørgaard, Louise, Olesen, Carsten Riis, Trøjelsgaard, Kristian, Pertoldi, Cino, Nielsen, Jeppe Lund, Taberlet, Pierre, Ruiz-González, Aritz, De Barba, Marta, Iacolina, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33767219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85488-9
_version_ 1783669757210263552
author Nørgaard, Louise
Olesen, Carsten Riis
Trøjelsgaard, Kristian
Pertoldi, Cino
Nielsen, Jeppe Lund
Taberlet, Pierre
Ruiz-González, Aritz
De Barba, Marta
Iacolina, Laura
author_facet Nørgaard, Louise
Olesen, Carsten Riis
Trøjelsgaard, Kristian
Pertoldi, Cino
Nielsen, Jeppe Lund
Taberlet, Pierre
Ruiz-González, Aritz
De Barba, Marta
Iacolina, Laura
author_sort Nørgaard, Louise
collection PubMed
description With an accelerating negative impact of anthropogenic actions on natural ecosystems, non-invasive biodiversity assessments are becoming increasingly crucial. As a consequence, the interest in the application of environmental DNA (eDNA) survey techniques has increased. The use of eDNA extracted from faeces from generalist predators, have recently been described as “biodiversity capsules” and suggested as a complementary tool for improving current biodiversity assessments. In this study, using faecal samples from two generalist omnivore species, the Eurasian badger and the red fox, we evaluated the applicability of eDNA metabarcoding in determining dietary composition, compared to macroscopic diet identification techniques. Subsequently, we used the dietary information obtained to assess its contribution to biodiversity assessments. Compared to classic macroscopic techniques, we found that eDNA metabarcoding detected more taxa, at higher taxonomic resolution, and proved to be an important technique to verify the species identification of the predator from field collected faeces. Furthermore, we showed how dietary analyses complemented field observations in describing biodiversity by identifying consumed flora and fauna that went unnoticed during field observations. While diet analysis approaches could not substitute field observations entirely, we suggest that their integration with other methods might overcome intrinsic limitations of single techniques in future biodiversity surveys.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7994446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79944462021-03-29 eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants Nørgaard, Louise Olesen, Carsten Riis Trøjelsgaard, Kristian Pertoldi, Cino Nielsen, Jeppe Lund Taberlet, Pierre Ruiz-González, Aritz De Barba, Marta Iacolina, Laura Sci Rep Article With an accelerating negative impact of anthropogenic actions on natural ecosystems, non-invasive biodiversity assessments are becoming increasingly crucial. As a consequence, the interest in the application of environmental DNA (eDNA) survey techniques has increased. The use of eDNA extracted from faeces from generalist predators, have recently been described as “biodiversity capsules” and suggested as a complementary tool for improving current biodiversity assessments. In this study, using faecal samples from two generalist omnivore species, the Eurasian badger and the red fox, we evaluated the applicability of eDNA metabarcoding in determining dietary composition, compared to macroscopic diet identification techniques. Subsequently, we used the dietary information obtained to assess its contribution to biodiversity assessments. Compared to classic macroscopic techniques, we found that eDNA metabarcoding detected more taxa, at higher taxonomic resolution, and proved to be an important technique to verify the species identification of the predator from field collected faeces. Furthermore, we showed how dietary analyses complemented field observations in describing biodiversity by identifying consumed flora and fauna that went unnoticed during field observations. While diet analysis approaches could not substitute field observations entirely, we suggest that their integration with other methods might overcome intrinsic limitations of single techniques in future biodiversity surveys. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7994446/ /pubmed/33767219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85488-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Nørgaard, Louise
Olesen, Carsten Riis
Trøjelsgaard, Kristian
Pertoldi, Cino
Nielsen, Jeppe Lund
Taberlet, Pierre
Ruiz-González, Aritz
De Barba, Marta
Iacolina, Laura
eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants
title eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants
title_full eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants
title_fullStr eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants
title_full_unstemmed eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants
title_short eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants
title_sort edna metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33767219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85488-9
work_keys_str_mv AT nørgaardlouise ednametabarcodingforbiodiversityassessmentgeneralistpredatorsassamplingassistants
AT olesencarstenriis ednametabarcodingforbiodiversityassessmentgeneralistpredatorsassamplingassistants
AT trøjelsgaardkristian ednametabarcodingforbiodiversityassessmentgeneralistpredatorsassamplingassistants
AT pertoldicino ednametabarcodingforbiodiversityassessmentgeneralistpredatorsassamplingassistants
AT nielsenjeppelund ednametabarcodingforbiodiversityassessmentgeneralistpredatorsassamplingassistants
AT taberletpierre ednametabarcodingforbiodiversityassessmentgeneralistpredatorsassamplingassistants
AT ruizgonzalezaritz ednametabarcodingforbiodiversityassessmentgeneralistpredatorsassamplingassistants
AT debarbamarta ednametabarcodingforbiodiversityassessmentgeneralistpredatorsassamplingassistants
AT iacolinalaura ednametabarcodingforbiodiversityassessmentgeneralistpredatorsassamplingassistants