Cargando…
Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer in the Era of Modern Radiation Techniques
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy (RT) has been considered the standard treatment for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) of advanced stages or with adverse prognostic factors. In this study, we compared the outcomes in patients with OCSCC who received postop...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33777764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.619372 |
_version_ | 1783669765905055744 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Tae Hyung Cha, In-Ho Choi, Eun Chang Kim, Hye Ryun Kim, Hyung Jun Kim, Se-Heon Keum, Ki Chang Lee, Chang Geol |
author_facet | Kim, Tae Hyung Cha, In-Ho Choi, Eun Chang Kim, Hye Ryun Kim, Hyung Jun Kim, Se-Heon Keum, Ki Chang Lee, Chang Geol |
author_sort | Kim, Tae Hyung |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy (RT) has been considered the standard treatment for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) of advanced stages or with adverse prognostic factors. In this study, we compared the outcomes in patients with OCSCC who received postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or postoperative RT alone using modern RT techniques. METHODS: A total of 275 patients with OCSCC treated between 2002 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Adverse prognostic factor was defined as extranodal extension (ENE), microscopically involved surgical margin, involvement of ≥2 lymph nodes, perineural disease, and/or lymphovascular invasion (LVI). In total, 148 patients (54%) received CCRT and 127 patients (46%) received RT alone. More patients in the CCRT group had N3 disease and stage IVB disease (46.6% vs. 10.2%, p<0.001), ENE (56.1% vs. 15.7%, p<0.001), LVI (28.4% vs. 13.4%, p=0.033). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 40 (range, 5–203) months, there were no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival (OS) and PFS between treatment groups. In the subgroup analysis according to high risk, the concurrent use of chemotherapy showed significantly improved OS in patients with ENE (HR 0.39, p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Our retrospective study showed that postoperative CCRT group had comparable survival outcomes to those in the RT alone group for advanced OCSCC in the era of modern RT techniques and indicated that concurrent chemotherapy should be administered to patients with ENE. Prospective randomized studies for confirmation are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7994509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79945092021-03-27 Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer in the Era of Modern Radiation Techniques Kim, Tae Hyung Cha, In-Ho Choi, Eun Chang Kim, Hye Ryun Kim, Hyung Jun Kim, Se-Heon Keum, Ki Chang Lee, Chang Geol Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy (RT) has been considered the standard treatment for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) of advanced stages or with adverse prognostic factors. In this study, we compared the outcomes in patients with OCSCC who received postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or postoperative RT alone using modern RT techniques. METHODS: A total of 275 patients with OCSCC treated between 2002 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Adverse prognostic factor was defined as extranodal extension (ENE), microscopically involved surgical margin, involvement of ≥2 lymph nodes, perineural disease, and/or lymphovascular invasion (LVI). In total, 148 patients (54%) received CCRT and 127 patients (46%) received RT alone. More patients in the CCRT group had N3 disease and stage IVB disease (46.6% vs. 10.2%, p<0.001), ENE (56.1% vs. 15.7%, p<0.001), LVI (28.4% vs. 13.4%, p=0.033). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 40 (range, 5–203) months, there were no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival (OS) and PFS between treatment groups. In the subgroup analysis according to high risk, the concurrent use of chemotherapy showed significantly improved OS in patients with ENE (HR 0.39, p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Our retrospective study showed that postoperative CCRT group had comparable survival outcomes to those in the RT alone group for advanced OCSCC in the era of modern RT techniques and indicated that concurrent chemotherapy should be administered to patients with ENE. Prospective randomized studies for confirmation are needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7994509/ /pubmed/33777764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.619372 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kim, Cha, Choi, Kim, Kim, Kim, Keum and Lee http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Kim, Tae Hyung Cha, In-Ho Choi, Eun Chang Kim, Hye Ryun Kim, Hyung Jun Kim, Se-Heon Keum, Ki Chang Lee, Chang Geol Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer in the Era of Modern Radiation Techniques |
title | Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer in the Era of Modern Radiation Techniques |
title_full | Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer in the Era of Modern Radiation Techniques |
title_fullStr | Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer in the Era of Modern Radiation Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer in the Era of Modern Radiation Techniques |
title_short | Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer in the Era of Modern Radiation Techniques |
title_sort | postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for advanced oral cavity cancer in the era of modern radiation techniques |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33777764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.619372 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimtaehyung postoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneforadvancedoralcavitycancerintheeraofmodernradiationtechniques AT chainho postoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneforadvancedoralcavitycancerintheeraofmodernradiationtechniques AT choieunchang postoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneforadvancedoralcavitycancerintheeraofmodernradiationtechniques AT kimhyeryun postoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneforadvancedoralcavitycancerintheeraofmodernradiationtechniques AT kimhyungjun postoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneforadvancedoralcavitycancerintheeraofmodernradiationtechniques AT kimseheon postoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneforadvancedoralcavitycancerintheeraofmodernradiationtechniques AT keumkichang postoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneforadvancedoralcavitycancerintheeraofmodernradiationtechniques AT leechanggeol postoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneforadvancedoralcavitycancerintheeraofmodernradiationtechniques |