Cargando…

Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer in the Era of Modern Radiation Techniques

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy (RT) has been considered the standard treatment for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) of advanced stages or with adverse prognostic factors. In this study, we compared the outcomes in patients with OCSCC who received postop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Tae Hyung, Cha, In-Ho, Choi, Eun Chang, Kim, Hye Ryun, Kim, Hyung Jun, Kim, Se-Heon, Keum, Ki Chang, Lee, Chang Geol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33777764
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.619372
_version_ 1783669765905055744
author Kim, Tae Hyung
Cha, In-Ho
Choi, Eun Chang
Kim, Hye Ryun
Kim, Hyung Jun
Kim, Se-Heon
Keum, Ki Chang
Lee, Chang Geol
author_facet Kim, Tae Hyung
Cha, In-Ho
Choi, Eun Chang
Kim, Hye Ryun
Kim, Hyung Jun
Kim, Se-Heon
Keum, Ki Chang
Lee, Chang Geol
author_sort Kim, Tae Hyung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy (RT) has been considered the standard treatment for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) of advanced stages or with adverse prognostic factors. In this study, we compared the outcomes in patients with OCSCC who received postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or postoperative RT alone using modern RT techniques. METHODS: A total of 275 patients with OCSCC treated between 2002 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Adverse prognostic factor was defined as extranodal extension (ENE), microscopically involved surgical margin, involvement of ≥2 lymph nodes, perineural disease, and/or lymphovascular invasion (LVI). In total, 148 patients (54%) received CCRT and 127 patients (46%) received RT alone. More patients in the CCRT group had N3 disease and stage IVB disease (46.6% vs. 10.2%, p<0.001), ENE (56.1% vs. 15.7%, p<0.001), LVI (28.4% vs. 13.4%, p=0.033). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 40 (range, 5–203) months, there were no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival (OS) and PFS between treatment groups. In the subgroup analysis according to high risk, the concurrent use of chemotherapy showed significantly improved OS in patients with ENE (HR 0.39, p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Our retrospective study showed that postoperative CCRT group had comparable survival outcomes to those in the RT alone group for advanced OCSCC in the era of modern RT techniques and indicated that concurrent chemotherapy should be administered to patients with ENE. Prospective randomized studies for confirmation are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7994509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79945092021-03-27 Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer in the Era of Modern Radiation Techniques Kim, Tae Hyung Cha, In-Ho Choi, Eun Chang Kim, Hye Ryun Kim, Hyung Jun Kim, Se-Heon Keum, Ki Chang Lee, Chang Geol Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy (RT) has been considered the standard treatment for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) of advanced stages or with adverse prognostic factors. In this study, we compared the outcomes in patients with OCSCC who received postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or postoperative RT alone using modern RT techniques. METHODS: A total of 275 patients with OCSCC treated between 2002 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Adverse prognostic factor was defined as extranodal extension (ENE), microscopically involved surgical margin, involvement of ≥2 lymph nodes, perineural disease, and/or lymphovascular invasion (LVI). In total, 148 patients (54%) received CCRT and 127 patients (46%) received RT alone. More patients in the CCRT group had N3 disease and stage IVB disease (46.6% vs. 10.2%, p<0.001), ENE (56.1% vs. 15.7%, p<0.001), LVI (28.4% vs. 13.4%, p=0.033). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 40 (range, 5–203) months, there were no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival (OS) and PFS between treatment groups. In the subgroup analysis according to high risk, the concurrent use of chemotherapy showed significantly improved OS in patients with ENE (HR 0.39, p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Our retrospective study showed that postoperative CCRT group had comparable survival outcomes to those in the RT alone group for advanced OCSCC in the era of modern RT techniques and indicated that concurrent chemotherapy should be administered to patients with ENE. Prospective randomized studies for confirmation are needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7994509/ /pubmed/33777764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.619372 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kim, Cha, Choi, Kim, Kim, Kim, Keum and Lee http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Kim, Tae Hyung
Cha, In-Ho
Choi, Eun Chang
Kim, Hye Ryun
Kim, Hyung Jun
Kim, Se-Heon
Keum, Ki Chang
Lee, Chang Geol
Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer in the Era of Modern Radiation Techniques
title Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer in the Era of Modern Radiation Techniques
title_full Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer in the Era of Modern Radiation Techniques
title_fullStr Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer in the Era of Modern Radiation Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer in the Era of Modern Radiation Techniques
title_short Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer in the Era of Modern Radiation Techniques
title_sort postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for advanced oral cavity cancer in the era of modern radiation techniques
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33777764
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.619372
work_keys_str_mv AT kimtaehyung postoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneforadvancedoralcavitycancerintheeraofmodernradiationtechniques
AT chainho postoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneforadvancedoralcavitycancerintheeraofmodernradiationtechniques
AT choieunchang postoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneforadvancedoralcavitycancerintheeraofmodernradiationtechniques
AT kimhyeryun postoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneforadvancedoralcavitycancerintheeraofmodernradiationtechniques
AT kimhyungjun postoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneforadvancedoralcavitycancerintheeraofmodernradiationtechniques
AT kimseheon postoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneforadvancedoralcavitycancerintheeraofmodernradiationtechniques
AT keumkichang postoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneforadvancedoralcavitycancerintheeraofmodernradiationtechniques
AT leechanggeol postoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusradiotherapyaloneforadvancedoralcavitycancerintheeraofmodernradiationtechniques