Cargando…

What shear wave elastography parameter best differentiates breast cancer and predicts its histologic aggressiveness?

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify useful shear wave elastography (SWE) parameters for differentiating breast cancer and predicting associated immunohistochemical factors and subtypes. METHODS: From November 2018 to February 2019, a total of 211 breast lesions from 190 patients who underwent conv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyunjin, Lee, Jeongmin, Kang, Bong Joo, Kim, Sung Hun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660207
http://dx.doi.org/10.14366/usg.20007
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify useful shear wave elastography (SWE) parameters for differentiating breast cancer and predicting associated immunohistochemical factors and subtypes. METHODS: From November 2018 to February 2019, a total of 211 breast lesions from 190 patients who underwent conventional breast ultrasonography and SWE were included. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories and qualitative and quantitative SWE parameters for each lesion were obtained. Pathologic results including immunohistochemical factors were evaluated. The diagnostic performance of each parameter and its correlation with histological characteristics, immunohistochemical factors, and subtypes of breast cancer were analyzed using analysis of variance, the independent t test, the Fisher exact test, logistic regression analysis, and the DeLong method. RESULTS: Among 211 breast lesions, 82 were malignant, and 129 were benign. Of the SWE parameters, Emax showed the highest area under the curve (AUC) for differentiating malignant from benign lesions (AUC, 0.891; cut-off>50.85). Poor tumor differentiation and progesterone receptor-negativity were correlated with higher SDmean and Emax (P<0.05). Ki-67-positive breast cancer showed higher SDmean and a heterogeneous color distribution (P<0.05). Ki-67 and cytokeratin 5/6-positive breast cancers showed higher Emax/Efat ratios (P<0.05). Luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-enriched, and triple-negative (non-basal) subtypes showed somewhat higher SDmean values than the luminal A and triple-negative (basal) subtypes (P=0.028). CONCLUSION: Emax is a reliable parameter for differentiating malignancies from benign breast lesions. In addition, high stiffness and SDmean values in tumors measured on SWE could be used to predict poorly differentiated, progesterone receptor-negative, or Ki-67-positive breast cancer.