Cargando…

Auto-Regulation Method vs. Fixed-Loading Method in Maximum Strength Training for Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The auto-regulation method is a rising training strategy to improve strength and motor performance, and the Autoregulatory Progressive Resistance Exercise (APRE), Rating of Perceived Exertion program (RPE), and Velocity-Based Training (VBT) are the three common auto-regulation programs. However, whe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xing, Li, Hansen, Bi, Shilin, Luo, Yong, Cao, Yang, Zhang, Guodong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776802
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.651112
_version_ 1783669822341513216
author Zhang, Xing
Li, Hansen
Bi, Shilin
Luo, Yong
Cao, Yang
Zhang, Guodong
author_facet Zhang, Xing
Li, Hansen
Bi, Shilin
Luo, Yong
Cao, Yang
Zhang, Guodong
author_sort Zhang, Xing
collection PubMed
description The auto-regulation method is a rising training strategy to improve strength and motor performance, and the Autoregulatory Progressive Resistance Exercise (APRE), Rating of Perceived Exertion program (RPE), and Velocity-Based Training (VBT) are the three common auto-regulation programs. However, whether the auto-regulation method is more effective than the traditional strength training (the fixed-loading method) in maximum strength training is still unclear. The present study searched the Pubmed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, Cochrane, CNKI, and CQVIP databases, and included eight related studies published between 2010 and 2020, with a total of 166 subjects including division 1 college players and athletes with at least 1-year training history, and interventions ranging from 5 to 10 weeks. A meta-analysis was performed to check the difference between the two training methods, and analyzed the differences in the existing auto-regulation programs' effectiveness. The overall results showed that the auto-regulation method was more effective than the fixed-loading method in maximum strength training (effect size = 0.64; P < 0.001; I(2) = 0%). In specific, the pooled results in subgroup analysis indicated that the auto-regulation method may effectively improve the strength performance in squat (effect size = 4.64; P < 0.05; I(2) = 54%) and bench press (effect size = 3.21; P < 0.05; I(2) = 62%). Greater benefits of the auto-regulation method on strength improvement could be achieved in an 8-week or even shorter training (effect size = 0.87; P < 0.001; I(2) = 0%) compared with those of 8–10 weeks (effect size = 0.32; P < 0.001; I(2) = 0%). The APRE is the most effective training program among the three auto-regulation programs (effect size = 0.78; P < 0.001; I(2) = 0%). In conclusion, the auto-regulation method could be more effective than the fixed-loading method in maximum strength training. The APRE is a convenient and effective training program that may be considered a practical training program to replace traditional training in athletes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7994759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79947592021-03-27 Auto-Regulation Method vs. Fixed-Loading Method in Maximum Strength Training for Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhang, Xing Li, Hansen Bi, Shilin Luo, Yong Cao, Yang Zhang, Guodong Front Physiol Physiology The auto-regulation method is a rising training strategy to improve strength and motor performance, and the Autoregulatory Progressive Resistance Exercise (APRE), Rating of Perceived Exertion program (RPE), and Velocity-Based Training (VBT) are the three common auto-regulation programs. However, whether the auto-regulation method is more effective than the traditional strength training (the fixed-loading method) in maximum strength training is still unclear. The present study searched the Pubmed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, Cochrane, CNKI, and CQVIP databases, and included eight related studies published between 2010 and 2020, with a total of 166 subjects including division 1 college players and athletes with at least 1-year training history, and interventions ranging from 5 to 10 weeks. A meta-analysis was performed to check the difference between the two training methods, and analyzed the differences in the existing auto-regulation programs' effectiveness. The overall results showed that the auto-regulation method was more effective than the fixed-loading method in maximum strength training (effect size = 0.64; P < 0.001; I(2) = 0%). In specific, the pooled results in subgroup analysis indicated that the auto-regulation method may effectively improve the strength performance in squat (effect size = 4.64; P < 0.05; I(2) = 54%) and bench press (effect size = 3.21; P < 0.05; I(2) = 62%). Greater benefits of the auto-regulation method on strength improvement could be achieved in an 8-week or even shorter training (effect size = 0.87; P < 0.001; I(2) = 0%) compared with those of 8–10 weeks (effect size = 0.32; P < 0.001; I(2) = 0%). The APRE is the most effective training program among the three auto-regulation programs (effect size = 0.78; P < 0.001; I(2) = 0%). In conclusion, the auto-regulation method could be more effective than the fixed-loading method in maximum strength training. The APRE is a convenient and effective training program that may be considered a practical training program to replace traditional training in athletes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7994759/ /pubmed/33776802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.651112 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Li, Bi, Luo, Cao and Zhang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Zhang, Xing
Li, Hansen
Bi, Shilin
Luo, Yong
Cao, Yang
Zhang, Guodong
Auto-Regulation Method vs. Fixed-Loading Method in Maximum Strength Training for Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Auto-Regulation Method vs. Fixed-Loading Method in Maximum Strength Training for Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Auto-Regulation Method vs. Fixed-Loading Method in Maximum Strength Training for Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Auto-Regulation Method vs. Fixed-Loading Method in Maximum Strength Training for Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Auto-Regulation Method vs. Fixed-Loading Method in Maximum Strength Training for Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Auto-Regulation Method vs. Fixed-Loading Method in Maximum Strength Training for Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort auto-regulation method vs. fixed-loading method in maximum strength training for athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776802
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.651112
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxing autoregulationmethodvsfixedloadingmethodinmaximumstrengthtrainingforathletesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lihansen autoregulationmethodvsfixedloadingmethodinmaximumstrengthtrainingforathletesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bishilin autoregulationmethodvsfixedloadingmethodinmaximumstrengthtrainingforathletesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luoyong autoregulationmethodvsfixedloadingmethodinmaximumstrengthtrainingforathletesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT caoyang autoregulationmethodvsfixedloadingmethodinmaximumstrengthtrainingforathletesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangguodong autoregulationmethodvsfixedloadingmethodinmaximumstrengthtrainingforathletesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis