Cargando…
Plastid phylogenomics resolves ambiguous relationships within the orchid family and provides a solid timeframe for biogeography and macroevolution
Recent phylogenomic analyses based on the maternally inherited plastid organelle have enlightened evolutionary relationships between the subfamilies of Orchidaceae and most of the tribes. However, uncertainty remains within several subtribes and genera for which phylogenetic relationships have not e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33767214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83664-5 |
_version_ | 1783669842865291264 |
---|---|
author | Serna-Sánchez, Maria Alejandra Pérez-Escobar, Oscar A. Bogarín, Diego Torres-Jimenez, María Fernanda Alvarez-Yela, Astrid Catalina Arcila-Galvis, Juliana E. Hall, Climbie F. de Barros, Fábio Pinheiro, Fábio Dodsworth, Steven Chase, Mark W. Antonelli, Alexandre Arias, Tatiana |
author_facet | Serna-Sánchez, Maria Alejandra Pérez-Escobar, Oscar A. Bogarín, Diego Torres-Jimenez, María Fernanda Alvarez-Yela, Astrid Catalina Arcila-Galvis, Juliana E. Hall, Climbie F. de Barros, Fábio Pinheiro, Fábio Dodsworth, Steven Chase, Mark W. Antonelli, Alexandre Arias, Tatiana |
author_sort | Serna-Sánchez, Maria Alejandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent phylogenomic analyses based on the maternally inherited plastid organelle have enlightened evolutionary relationships between the subfamilies of Orchidaceae and most of the tribes. However, uncertainty remains within several subtribes and genera for which phylogenetic relationships have not ever been tested in a phylogenomic context. To address these knowledge-gaps, we here provide the most extensively sampled analysis of the orchid family to date, based on 78 plastid coding genes representing 264 species, 117 genera, 18 tribes and 28 subtribes. Divergence times are also provided as inferred from strict and relaxed molecular clocks and birth–death tree models. Our taxon sampling includes 51 newly sequenced plastid genomes produced by a genome skimming approach. We focus our sampling efforts on previously unplaced clades within tribes Cymbidieae and Epidendreae. Our results confirmed phylogenetic relationships in Orchidaceae as recovered in previous studies, most of which were recovered with maximum support (209 of the 262 tree branches). We provide for the first time a clear phylogenetic placement for Codonorchideae within subfamily Orchidoideae, and Podochilieae and Collabieae within subfamily Epidendroideae. We also identify relationships that have been persistently problematic across multiple studies, regardless of the different details of sampling and genomic datasets used for phylogenetic reconstructions. Our study provides an expanded, robust temporal phylogenomic framework of the Orchidaceae that paves the way for biogeographical and macroevolutionary studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7994851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79948512021-03-29 Plastid phylogenomics resolves ambiguous relationships within the orchid family and provides a solid timeframe for biogeography and macroevolution Serna-Sánchez, Maria Alejandra Pérez-Escobar, Oscar A. Bogarín, Diego Torres-Jimenez, María Fernanda Alvarez-Yela, Astrid Catalina Arcila-Galvis, Juliana E. Hall, Climbie F. de Barros, Fábio Pinheiro, Fábio Dodsworth, Steven Chase, Mark W. Antonelli, Alexandre Arias, Tatiana Sci Rep Article Recent phylogenomic analyses based on the maternally inherited plastid organelle have enlightened evolutionary relationships between the subfamilies of Orchidaceae and most of the tribes. However, uncertainty remains within several subtribes and genera for which phylogenetic relationships have not ever been tested in a phylogenomic context. To address these knowledge-gaps, we here provide the most extensively sampled analysis of the orchid family to date, based on 78 plastid coding genes representing 264 species, 117 genera, 18 tribes and 28 subtribes. Divergence times are also provided as inferred from strict and relaxed molecular clocks and birth–death tree models. Our taxon sampling includes 51 newly sequenced plastid genomes produced by a genome skimming approach. We focus our sampling efforts on previously unplaced clades within tribes Cymbidieae and Epidendreae. Our results confirmed phylogenetic relationships in Orchidaceae as recovered in previous studies, most of which were recovered with maximum support (209 of the 262 tree branches). We provide for the first time a clear phylogenetic placement for Codonorchideae within subfamily Orchidoideae, and Podochilieae and Collabieae within subfamily Epidendroideae. We also identify relationships that have been persistently problematic across multiple studies, regardless of the different details of sampling and genomic datasets used for phylogenetic reconstructions. Our study provides an expanded, robust temporal phylogenomic framework of the Orchidaceae that paves the way for biogeographical and macroevolutionary studies. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7994851/ /pubmed/33767214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83664-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Serna-Sánchez, Maria Alejandra Pérez-Escobar, Oscar A. Bogarín, Diego Torres-Jimenez, María Fernanda Alvarez-Yela, Astrid Catalina Arcila-Galvis, Juliana E. Hall, Climbie F. de Barros, Fábio Pinheiro, Fábio Dodsworth, Steven Chase, Mark W. Antonelli, Alexandre Arias, Tatiana Plastid phylogenomics resolves ambiguous relationships within the orchid family and provides a solid timeframe for biogeography and macroevolution |
title | Plastid phylogenomics resolves ambiguous relationships within the orchid family and provides a solid timeframe for biogeography and macroevolution |
title_full | Plastid phylogenomics resolves ambiguous relationships within the orchid family and provides a solid timeframe for biogeography and macroevolution |
title_fullStr | Plastid phylogenomics resolves ambiguous relationships within the orchid family and provides a solid timeframe for biogeography and macroevolution |
title_full_unstemmed | Plastid phylogenomics resolves ambiguous relationships within the orchid family and provides a solid timeframe for biogeography and macroevolution |
title_short | Plastid phylogenomics resolves ambiguous relationships within the orchid family and provides a solid timeframe for biogeography and macroevolution |
title_sort | plastid phylogenomics resolves ambiguous relationships within the orchid family and provides a solid timeframe for biogeography and macroevolution |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33767214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83664-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sernasanchezmariaalejandra plastidphylogenomicsresolvesambiguousrelationshipswithintheorchidfamilyandprovidesasolidtimeframeforbiogeographyandmacroevolution AT perezescobaroscara plastidphylogenomicsresolvesambiguousrelationshipswithintheorchidfamilyandprovidesasolidtimeframeforbiogeographyandmacroevolution AT bogarindiego plastidphylogenomicsresolvesambiguousrelationshipswithintheorchidfamilyandprovidesasolidtimeframeforbiogeographyandmacroevolution AT torresjimenezmariafernanda plastidphylogenomicsresolvesambiguousrelationshipswithintheorchidfamilyandprovidesasolidtimeframeforbiogeographyandmacroevolution AT alvarezyelaastridcatalina plastidphylogenomicsresolvesambiguousrelationshipswithintheorchidfamilyandprovidesasolidtimeframeforbiogeographyandmacroevolution AT arcilagalvisjulianae plastidphylogenomicsresolvesambiguousrelationshipswithintheorchidfamilyandprovidesasolidtimeframeforbiogeographyandmacroevolution AT hallclimbief plastidphylogenomicsresolvesambiguousrelationshipswithintheorchidfamilyandprovidesasolidtimeframeforbiogeographyandmacroevolution AT debarrosfabio plastidphylogenomicsresolvesambiguousrelationshipswithintheorchidfamilyandprovidesasolidtimeframeforbiogeographyandmacroevolution AT pinheirofabio plastidphylogenomicsresolvesambiguousrelationshipswithintheorchidfamilyandprovidesasolidtimeframeforbiogeographyandmacroevolution AT dodsworthsteven plastidphylogenomicsresolvesambiguousrelationshipswithintheorchidfamilyandprovidesasolidtimeframeforbiogeographyandmacroevolution AT chasemarkw plastidphylogenomicsresolvesambiguousrelationshipswithintheorchidfamilyandprovidesasolidtimeframeforbiogeographyandmacroevolution AT antonellialexandre plastidphylogenomicsresolvesambiguousrelationshipswithintheorchidfamilyandprovidesasolidtimeframeforbiogeographyandmacroevolution AT ariastatiana plastidphylogenomicsresolvesambiguousrelationshipswithintheorchidfamilyandprovidesasolidtimeframeforbiogeographyandmacroevolution |