Cargando…

Clinical performance of a point‐of‐care Coccidioides antibody test in dogs

BACKGROUND: Point‐of‐care (POC) Coccidioides antibody assays may provide veterinarians with rapid and accurate diagnostic information. OBJECTIVES: To determine the agreement of a POC lateral flow assay (LFA), sona Coccidioides (IMMY, Norman, Oklahoma) with the current diagnostic standard, the immuno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reagan, Krystle L., McHardy, Ian, Thompson, George R., Sykes, Jane E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7995422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33675146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16087
_version_ 1783669916322234368
author Reagan, Krystle L.
McHardy, Ian
Thompson, George R.
Sykes, Jane E.
author_facet Reagan, Krystle L.
McHardy, Ian
Thompson, George R.
Sykes, Jane E.
author_sort Reagan, Krystle L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Point‐of‐care (POC) Coccidioides antibody assays may provide veterinarians with rapid and accurate diagnostic information. OBJECTIVES: To determine the agreement of a POC lateral flow assay (LFA), sona Coccidioides (IMMY, Norman, Oklahoma) with the current diagnostic standard, the immunodiffusion assay (agar gel immunodiffusion [AGID]; Coccidioidomycosis Serology Laboratory, University of California, Davis, California). ANIMALS: Forty‐eight sera specimens from 48 dogs. METHODS: Sera specimens were collected from client‐owned dogs that had a clinical suspicion for coccidioidomycosis. Animals were classified as Coccidioides antibody‐positive (n = 36) based on a positive AGID or Coccidioides antibody‐negative (n = 12) based on a negative AGID. The performance of the LFA assay was determined by comparing results to AGID results. RESULTS: The LFA assay demonstrated agreement in 32 of 36 Coccidioides antibody‐positive specimens and 12 of 12 Coccidioides antibody‐negative specimens, resulting in a positive percentage agreement of 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74.7‐95.6%) and negative percentage agreement of 100% (95% CI, 75.8‐100%) as compared to AGID. A receiver operator characteristic curve was constructed, and the area under the curve was 0.944 (CI, 0.880‐1.000). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: This LFA is a rapid alternative to the traditional AGID. The LFA provides excellent predictive value for positive results. Positive agreement was lower in dogs with low AGID titers; therefore, confirmatory testing is recommended if a high index of suspicion exists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7995422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79954222021-03-30 Clinical performance of a point‐of‐care Coccidioides antibody test in dogs Reagan, Krystle L. McHardy, Ian Thompson, George R. Sykes, Jane E. J Vet Intern Med SMALL ANIMAL BACKGROUND: Point‐of‐care (POC) Coccidioides antibody assays may provide veterinarians with rapid and accurate diagnostic information. OBJECTIVES: To determine the agreement of a POC lateral flow assay (LFA), sona Coccidioides (IMMY, Norman, Oklahoma) with the current diagnostic standard, the immunodiffusion assay (agar gel immunodiffusion [AGID]; Coccidioidomycosis Serology Laboratory, University of California, Davis, California). ANIMALS: Forty‐eight sera specimens from 48 dogs. METHODS: Sera specimens were collected from client‐owned dogs that had a clinical suspicion for coccidioidomycosis. Animals were classified as Coccidioides antibody‐positive (n = 36) based on a positive AGID or Coccidioides antibody‐negative (n = 12) based on a negative AGID. The performance of the LFA assay was determined by comparing results to AGID results. RESULTS: The LFA assay demonstrated agreement in 32 of 36 Coccidioides antibody‐positive specimens and 12 of 12 Coccidioides antibody‐negative specimens, resulting in a positive percentage agreement of 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74.7‐95.6%) and negative percentage agreement of 100% (95% CI, 75.8‐100%) as compared to AGID. A receiver operator characteristic curve was constructed, and the area under the curve was 0.944 (CI, 0.880‐1.000). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: This LFA is a rapid alternative to the traditional AGID. The LFA provides excellent predictive value for positive results. Positive agreement was lower in dogs with low AGID titers; therefore, confirmatory testing is recommended if a high index of suspicion exists. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-03-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7995422/ /pubmed/33675146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16087 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle SMALL ANIMAL
Reagan, Krystle L.
McHardy, Ian
Thompson, George R.
Sykes, Jane E.
Clinical performance of a point‐of‐care Coccidioides antibody test in dogs
title Clinical performance of a point‐of‐care Coccidioides antibody test in dogs
title_full Clinical performance of a point‐of‐care Coccidioides antibody test in dogs
title_fullStr Clinical performance of a point‐of‐care Coccidioides antibody test in dogs
title_full_unstemmed Clinical performance of a point‐of‐care Coccidioides antibody test in dogs
title_short Clinical performance of a point‐of‐care Coccidioides antibody test in dogs
title_sort clinical performance of a point‐of‐care coccidioides antibody test in dogs
topic SMALL ANIMAL
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7995422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33675146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16087
work_keys_str_mv AT reagankrystlel clinicalperformanceofapointofcarecoccidioidesantibodytestindogs
AT mchardyian clinicalperformanceofapointofcarecoccidioidesantibodytestindogs
AT thompsongeorger clinicalperformanceofapointofcarecoccidioidesantibodytestindogs
AT sykesjanee clinicalperformanceofapointofcarecoccidioidesantibodytestindogs