Cargando…

Kangaroo mother care: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study

BACKGROUND: Kangaroo mother care (KMC) reduces mortality among stable neonates ≤2000 g. Lack of data tracking coverage and quality of KMC in both surveys and routine information systems impedes scale-up. This paper evaluates KMC measurement as part of the Every Newborn Birth Indicators Research Trac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salim, Nahya, Shabani, Josephine, Peven, Kimberly, Rahman, Qazi Sadeq-ur, KC, Ashish, Shamba, Donat, Ruysen, Harriet, Rahman, Ahmed Ehsanur, KC, Naresh, Mkopi, Namala, Zaman, Sojib Bin, Shirima, Kizito, Ameen, Shafiqul, Kong, Stefanie, Basnet, Omkar, Manji, Karim, Kabuteni, Theopista John, Brotherton, Helen, Moxon, Sarah G., Amouzou, Agbessi, Hailegebriel, Tedbabe Degefie, Day, Louise T., Lawn, Joy E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7995571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33765950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03423-8
_version_ 1783669944179752960
author Salim, Nahya
Shabani, Josephine
Peven, Kimberly
Rahman, Qazi Sadeq-ur
KC, Ashish
Shamba, Donat
Ruysen, Harriet
Rahman, Ahmed Ehsanur
KC, Naresh
Mkopi, Namala
Zaman, Sojib Bin
Shirima, Kizito
Ameen, Shafiqul
Kong, Stefanie
Basnet, Omkar
Manji, Karim
Kabuteni, Theopista John
Brotherton, Helen
Moxon, Sarah G.
Amouzou, Agbessi
Hailegebriel, Tedbabe Degefie
Day, Louise T.
Lawn, Joy E.
author_facet Salim, Nahya
Shabani, Josephine
Peven, Kimberly
Rahman, Qazi Sadeq-ur
KC, Ashish
Shamba, Donat
Ruysen, Harriet
Rahman, Ahmed Ehsanur
KC, Naresh
Mkopi, Namala
Zaman, Sojib Bin
Shirima, Kizito
Ameen, Shafiqul
Kong, Stefanie
Basnet, Omkar
Manji, Karim
Kabuteni, Theopista John
Brotherton, Helen
Moxon, Sarah G.
Amouzou, Agbessi
Hailegebriel, Tedbabe Degefie
Day, Louise T.
Lawn, Joy E.
author_sort Salim, Nahya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Kangaroo mother care (KMC) reduces mortality among stable neonates ≤2000 g. Lack of data tracking coverage and quality of KMC in both surveys and routine information systems impedes scale-up. This paper evaluates KMC measurement as part of the Every Newborn Birth Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals (EN-BIRTH) study. METHODS: The EN-BIRTH observational mixed-methods study was conducted in five hospitals in Bangladesh, Nepal and Tanzania from 2017 to 2018. Clinical observers collected time-stamped data as gold standard for mother-baby pairs in KMC wards/corners. To assess accuracy, we compared routine register-recorded and women’s exit survey-reported coverage to observed data, using different recommended denominator options (≤2000 g and ≤ 2499 g). We analysed gaps in quality of provision and experience of KMC. In the Tanzanian hospitals, we assessed daily skin-to-skin duration/dose and feeding frequency. Qualitative data were collected from health workers and data collectors regarding barriers and enablers to routine register design, filling and use. RESULTS: Among 840 mother-baby pairs, compared to observed 100% coverage, both exit-survey reported (99.9%) and register-recorded coverage (92.9%) were highly valid measures with high sensitivity. KMC specific registers outperformed general registers. Enablers to register recording included perceptions of data usefulness, while barriers included duplication of data elements and overburdened health workers. Gaps in KMC quality were identified for position components including wearing a hat. In Temeke Tanzania, 10.6% of babies received daily KMC skin-to-skin duration/dose of ≥20 h and a further 75.3% received 12–19 h. Regular feeding ≥8 times/day was observed for 36.5% babies in Temeke Tanzania and 14.6% in Muhimbili Tanzania. Cup-feeding was the predominant assisted feeding method. Family support during admission was variable, grandmothers co-provided KMC more often in Bangladesh. No facility arrangements for other family members were reported by 45% of women at exit survey. CONCLUSIONS: Routine hospital KMC register data have potential to track coverage from hospital KMC wards/corners. Women accurately reported KMC at exit survey and evaluation for population-based surveys could be considered. Measurement of content, quality and experience of KMC need consensus on definitions. Prioritising further KMC measurement research is important so that high quality data can be used to accelerate scale-up of high impact care for the most vulnerable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-020-03423-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7995571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79955712021-03-26 Kangaroo mother care: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study Salim, Nahya Shabani, Josephine Peven, Kimberly Rahman, Qazi Sadeq-ur KC, Ashish Shamba, Donat Ruysen, Harriet Rahman, Ahmed Ehsanur KC, Naresh Mkopi, Namala Zaman, Sojib Bin Shirima, Kizito Ameen, Shafiqul Kong, Stefanie Basnet, Omkar Manji, Karim Kabuteni, Theopista John Brotherton, Helen Moxon, Sarah G. Amouzou, Agbessi Hailegebriel, Tedbabe Degefie Day, Louise T. Lawn, Joy E. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Kangaroo mother care (KMC) reduces mortality among stable neonates ≤2000 g. Lack of data tracking coverage and quality of KMC in both surveys and routine information systems impedes scale-up. This paper evaluates KMC measurement as part of the Every Newborn Birth Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals (EN-BIRTH) study. METHODS: The EN-BIRTH observational mixed-methods study was conducted in five hospitals in Bangladesh, Nepal and Tanzania from 2017 to 2018. Clinical observers collected time-stamped data as gold standard for mother-baby pairs in KMC wards/corners. To assess accuracy, we compared routine register-recorded and women’s exit survey-reported coverage to observed data, using different recommended denominator options (≤2000 g and ≤ 2499 g). We analysed gaps in quality of provision and experience of KMC. In the Tanzanian hospitals, we assessed daily skin-to-skin duration/dose and feeding frequency. Qualitative data were collected from health workers and data collectors regarding barriers and enablers to routine register design, filling and use. RESULTS: Among 840 mother-baby pairs, compared to observed 100% coverage, both exit-survey reported (99.9%) and register-recorded coverage (92.9%) were highly valid measures with high sensitivity. KMC specific registers outperformed general registers. Enablers to register recording included perceptions of data usefulness, while barriers included duplication of data elements and overburdened health workers. Gaps in KMC quality were identified for position components including wearing a hat. In Temeke Tanzania, 10.6% of babies received daily KMC skin-to-skin duration/dose of ≥20 h and a further 75.3% received 12–19 h. Regular feeding ≥8 times/day was observed for 36.5% babies in Temeke Tanzania and 14.6% in Muhimbili Tanzania. Cup-feeding was the predominant assisted feeding method. Family support during admission was variable, grandmothers co-provided KMC more often in Bangladesh. No facility arrangements for other family members were reported by 45% of women at exit survey. CONCLUSIONS: Routine hospital KMC register data have potential to track coverage from hospital KMC wards/corners. Women accurately reported KMC at exit survey and evaluation for population-based surveys could be considered. Measurement of content, quality and experience of KMC need consensus on definitions. Prioritising further KMC measurement research is important so that high quality data can be used to accelerate scale-up of high impact care for the most vulnerable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-020-03423-8. BioMed Central 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7995571/ /pubmed/33765950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03423-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Salim, Nahya
Shabani, Josephine
Peven, Kimberly
Rahman, Qazi Sadeq-ur
KC, Ashish
Shamba, Donat
Ruysen, Harriet
Rahman, Ahmed Ehsanur
KC, Naresh
Mkopi, Namala
Zaman, Sojib Bin
Shirima, Kizito
Ameen, Shafiqul
Kong, Stefanie
Basnet, Omkar
Manji, Karim
Kabuteni, Theopista John
Brotherton, Helen
Moxon, Sarah G.
Amouzou, Agbessi
Hailegebriel, Tedbabe Degefie
Day, Louise T.
Lawn, Joy E.
Kangaroo mother care: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study
title Kangaroo mother care: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study
title_full Kangaroo mother care: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study
title_fullStr Kangaroo mother care: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study
title_full_unstemmed Kangaroo mother care: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study
title_short Kangaroo mother care: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study
title_sort kangaroo mother care: en-birth multi-country validation study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7995571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33765950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03423-8
work_keys_str_mv AT salimnahya kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT shabanijosephine kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT pevenkimberly kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT rahmanqazisadequr kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT kcashish kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT shambadonat kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT ruysenharriet kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT rahmanahmedehsanur kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT kcnaresh kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT mkopinamala kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT zamansojibbin kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT shirimakizito kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT ameenshafiqul kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT kongstefanie kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT basnetomkar kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT manjikarim kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT kabutenitheopistajohn kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT brothertonhelen kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT moxonsarahg kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT amouzouagbessi kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT hailegebrieltedbabedegefie kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT daylouiset kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT lawnjoye kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy
AT kangaroomothercareenbirthmulticountryvalidationstudy