Cargando…

Assessing the accuracy of low-cost optical particle sensors using a physics-based approach

Low-cost sensors for measuring particulate matter (PM) offer the ability to understand human exposure to air pollution at spatiotemporal scales that have previously been impractical. However, such low-cost PM sensors tend to be poorly characterized, and their measurements of mass concentration can b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hagan, David H., Kroll, Jesse H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7995643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33777248
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6343-2020
_version_ 1783669953388347392
author Hagan, David H.
Kroll, Jesse H.
author_facet Hagan, David H.
Kroll, Jesse H.
author_sort Hagan, David H.
collection PubMed
description Low-cost sensors for measuring particulate matter (PM) offer the ability to understand human exposure to air pollution at spatiotemporal scales that have previously been impractical. However, such low-cost PM sensors tend to be poorly characterized, and their measurements of mass concentration can be subject to considerable error. Recent studies have investigated how individual factors can contribute to this error, but these studies are largely based on empirical comparisons and generally do not examine the role of multiple factors simultaneously. Here, we present a new physics-based framework and open-source software package (opcsim) for evaluating the ability of low-cost optical particle sensors (optical particle counters and nephelometers) to accurately characterize the size distribution and/or mass loading of aerosol particles. This framework, which uses Mie theory to calculate the response of a given sensor to a given particle population, is used to estimate the fractional error in mass loading for different sensor types given variations in relative humidity, aerosol optical properties, and the underlying particle size distribution. Results indicate that such error, which can be substantial, is dependent on the sensor technology (nephelometer vs. optical particle counter), the specific parameters of the individual sensor, and differences between the aerosol used to calibrate the sensor and the aerosol being measured. We conclude with a summary of likely sources of error for different sensor types, environmental conditions, and particle classes and offer general recommendations for the choice of calibrant under different measurement scenarios.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7995643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79956432021-03-26 Assessing the accuracy of low-cost optical particle sensors using a physics-based approach Hagan, David H. Kroll, Jesse H. Atmos Meas Tech Article Low-cost sensors for measuring particulate matter (PM) offer the ability to understand human exposure to air pollution at spatiotemporal scales that have previously been impractical. However, such low-cost PM sensors tend to be poorly characterized, and their measurements of mass concentration can be subject to considerable error. Recent studies have investigated how individual factors can contribute to this error, but these studies are largely based on empirical comparisons and generally do not examine the role of multiple factors simultaneously. Here, we present a new physics-based framework and open-source software package (opcsim) for evaluating the ability of low-cost optical particle sensors (optical particle counters and nephelometers) to accurately characterize the size distribution and/or mass loading of aerosol particles. This framework, which uses Mie theory to calculate the response of a given sensor to a given particle population, is used to estimate the fractional error in mass loading for different sensor types given variations in relative humidity, aerosol optical properties, and the underlying particle size distribution. Results indicate that such error, which can be substantial, is dependent on the sensor technology (nephelometer vs. optical particle counter), the specific parameters of the individual sensor, and differences between the aerosol used to calibrate the sensor and the aerosol being measured. We conclude with a summary of likely sources of error for different sensor types, environmental conditions, and particle classes and offer general recommendations for the choice of calibrant under different measurement scenarios. 2020-11-26 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7995643/ /pubmed/33777248 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6343-2020 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Article
Hagan, David H.
Kroll, Jesse H.
Assessing the accuracy of low-cost optical particle sensors using a physics-based approach
title Assessing the accuracy of low-cost optical particle sensors using a physics-based approach
title_full Assessing the accuracy of low-cost optical particle sensors using a physics-based approach
title_fullStr Assessing the accuracy of low-cost optical particle sensors using a physics-based approach
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the accuracy of low-cost optical particle sensors using a physics-based approach
title_short Assessing the accuracy of low-cost optical particle sensors using a physics-based approach
title_sort assessing the accuracy of low-cost optical particle sensors using a physics-based approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7995643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33777248
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6343-2020
work_keys_str_mv AT hagandavidh assessingtheaccuracyoflowcostopticalparticlesensorsusingaphysicsbasedapproach
AT krolljesseh assessingtheaccuracyoflowcostopticalparticlesensorsusingaphysicsbasedapproach