Cargando…
Drug-drug interactions in subjects enrolled in SWOG trials of oral chemotherapy
BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer are at increased risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI), which can increase treatment toxicity or decrease efficacy. It is especially important to thoroughly screen DDI in oncology clinical trial subjects to ensure trial subject safety and data accuracy. This study det...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7995697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08050-w |
_version_ | 1783669963660197888 |
---|---|
author | Marcath, Lauren A. Finley, Colin M. Wong, Siu Fun Hertz, Daniel L. |
author_facet | Marcath, Lauren A. Finley, Colin M. Wong, Siu Fun Hertz, Daniel L. |
author_sort | Marcath, Lauren A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer are at increased risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI), which can increase treatment toxicity or decrease efficacy. It is especially important to thoroughly screen DDI in oncology clinical trial subjects to ensure trial subject safety and data accuracy. This study determined the prevalence of potential DDI involving oral anti-cancer trial agents in subjects enrolled in two SWOG clinical trials. METHODS: Completed SWOG clinical trials of commercially available agents with possible DDI that had complete concomitant medication information available at enrollment were included. Screening for DDI was conducted through three methods: protocol-guided screening, Lexicomp® screening, and pharmacist determination of clinical relevance. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: SWOG trials S0711 (dasatinib, n = 83) and S0528 (everolimus/lapatinib, n = 84) were included. Subjects received an average of 6.6 medications (standard deviation = 4.9, range 0–29) at enrollment. Based on the clinical trial protocols, at enrollment 18.6% (31/167) of subjects had a DDI and 12.0% (20/167) had a DDI that violated a protocol exclusion criterion. According to Lexicomp®, 28.7% of subjects (48/167) had a DDI classified as moderate or worse, whereas pharmacist review indicated that 7.2% of subjects (12/167) had a clinically relevant interaction. The majority of clinically relevant DDI identified were due to the coadministration of acid suppression therapies with dasatinib (83.3%, 10/12). CONCLUSIONS: The high DDI prevalence in subjects enrolled on SWOG clinical trials, including a high prevalence that violate trial exclusion criteria, support the need for improved processes for DDI screening to ensure trial subject safety and trial data accuracy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08050-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7995697 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79956972021-03-26 Drug-drug interactions in subjects enrolled in SWOG trials of oral chemotherapy Marcath, Lauren A. Finley, Colin M. Wong, Siu Fun Hertz, Daniel L. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer are at increased risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI), which can increase treatment toxicity or decrease efficacy. It is especially important to thoroughly screen DDI in oncology clinical trial subjects to ensure trial subject safety and data accuracy. This study determined the prevalence of potential DDI involving oral anti-cancer trial agents in subjects enrolled in two SWOG clinical trials. METHODS: Completed SWOG clinical trials of commercially available agents with possible DDI that had complete concomitant medication information available at enrollment were included. Screening for DDI was conducted through three methods: protocol-guided screening, Lexicomp® screening, and pharmacist determination of clinical relevance. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: SWOG trials S0711 (dasatinib, n = 83) and S0528 (everolimus/lapatinib, n = 84) were included. Subjects received an average of 6.6 medications (standard deviation = 4.9, range 0–29) at enrollment. Based on the clinical trial protocols, at enrollment 18.6% (31/167) of subjects had a DDI and 12.0% (20/167) had a DDI that violated a protocol exclusion criterion. According to Lexicomp®, 28.7% of subjects (48/167) had a DDI classified as moderate or worse, whereas pharmacist review indicated that 7.2% of subjects (12/167) had a clinically relevant interaction. The majority of clinically relevant DDI identified were due to the coadministration of acid suppression therapies with dasatinib (83.3%, 10/12). CONCLUSIONS: The high DDI prevalence in subjects enrolled on SWOG clinical trials, including a high prevalence that violate trial exclusion criteria, support the need for improved processes for DDI screening to ensure trial subject safety and trial data accuracy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08050-w. BioMed Central 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7995697/ /pubmed/33771105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08050-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Marcath, Lauren A. Finley, Colin M. Wong, Siu Fun Hertz, Daniel L. Drug-drug interactions in subjects enrolled in SWOG trials of oral chemotherapy |
title | Drug-drug interactions in subjects enrolled in SWOG trials of oral chemotherapy |
title_full | Drug-drug interactions in subjects enrolled in SWOG trials of oral chemotherapy |
title_fullStr | Drug-drug interactions in subjects enrolled in SWOG trials of oral chemotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Drug-drug interactions in subjects enrolled in SWOG trials of oral chemotherapy |
title_short | Drug-drug interactions in subjects enrolled in SWOG trials of oral chemotherapy |
title_sort | drug-drug interactions in subjects enrolled in swog trials of oral chemotherapy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7995697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08050-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marcathlaurena drugdruginteractionsinsubjectsenrolledinswogtrialsoforalchemotherapy AT finleycolinm drugdruginteractionsinsubjectsenrolledinswogtrialsoforalchemotherapy AT wongsiufun drugdruginteractionsinsubjectsenrolledinswogtrialsoforalchemotherapy AT hertzdaniell drugdruginteractionsinsubjectsenrolledinswogtrialsoforalchemotherapy |