Cargando…

Drug-drug interactions in subjects enrolled in SWOG trials of oral chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer are at increased risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI), which can increase treatment toxicity or decrease efficacy. It is especially important to thoroughly screen DDI in oncology clinical trial subjects to ensure trial subject safety and data accuracy. This study det...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marcath, Lauren A., Finley, Colin M., Wong, Siu Fun, Hertz, Daniel L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7995697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08050-w
_version_ 1783669963660197888
author Marcath, Lauren A.
Finley, Colin M.
Wong, Siu Fun
Hertz, Daniel L.
author_facet Marcath, Lauren A.
Finley, Colin M.
Wong, Siu Fun
Hertz, Daniel L.
author_sort Marcath, Lauren A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer are at increased risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI), which can increase treatment toxicity or decrease efficacy. It is especially important to thoroughly screen DDI in oncology clinical trial subjects to ensure trial subject safety and data accuracy. This study determined the prevalence of potential DDI involving oral anti-cancer trial agents in subjects enrolled in two SWOG clinical trials. METHODS: Completed SWOG clinical trials of commercially available agents with possible DDI that had complete concomitant medication information available at enrollment were included. Screening for DDI was conducted through three methods: protocol-guided screening, Lexicomp® screening, and pharmacist determination of clinical relevance. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: SWOG trials S0711 (dasatinib, n = 83) and S0528 (everolimus/lapatinib, n = 84) were included. Subjects received an average of 6.6 medications (standard deviation = 4.9, range 0–29) at enrollment. Based on the clinical trial protocols, at enrollment 18.6% (31/167) of subjects had a DDI and 12.0% (20/167) had a DDI that violated a protocol exclusion criterion. According to Lexicomp®, 28.7% of subjects (48/167) had a DDI classified as moderate or worse, whereas pharmacist review indicated that 7.2% of subjects (12/167) had a clinically relevant interaction. The majority of clinically relevant DDI identified were due to the coadministration of acid suppression therapies with dasatinib (83.3%, 10/12). CONCLUSIONS: The high DDI prevalence in subjects enrolled on SWOG clinical trials, including a high prevalence that violate trial exclusion criteria, support the need for improved processes for DDI screening to ensure trial subject safety and trial data accuracy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08050-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7995697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79956972021-03-26 Drug-drug interactions in subjects enrolled in SWOG trials of oral chemotherapy Marcath, Lauren A. Finley, Colin M. Wong, Siu Fun Hertz, Daniel L. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer are at increased risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI), which can increase treatment toxicity or decrease efficacy. It is especially important to thoroughly screen DDI in oncology clinical trial subjects to ensure trial subject safety and data accuracy. This study determined the prevalence of potential DDI involving oral anti-cancer trial agents in subjects enrolled in two SWOG clinical trials. METHODS: Completed SWOG clinical trials of commercially available agents with possible DDI that had complete concomitant medication information available at enrollment were included. Screening for DDI was conducted through three methods: protocol-guided screening, Lexicomp® screening, and pharmacist determination of clinical relevance. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: SWOG trials S0711 (dasatinib, n = 83) and S0528 (everolimus/lapatinib, n = 84) were included. Subjects received an average of 6.6 medications (standard deviation = 4.9, range 0–29) at enrollment. Based on the clinical trial protocols, at enrollment 18.6% (31/167) of subjects had a DDI and 12.0% (20/167) had a DDI that violated a protocol exclusion criterion. According to Lexicomp®, 28.7% of subjects (48/167) had a DDI classified as moderate or worse, whereas pharmacist review indicated that 7.2% of subjects (12/167) had a clinically relevant interaction. The majority of clinically relevant DDI identified were due to the coadministration of acid suppression therapies with dasatinib (83.3%, 10/12). CONCLUSIONS: The high DDI prevalence in subjects enrolled on SWOG clinical trials, including a high prevalence that violate trial exclusion criteria, support the need for improved processes for DDI screening to ensure trial subject safety and trial data accuracy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08050-w. BioMed Central 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7995697/ /pubmed/33771105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08050-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Marcath, Lauren A.
Finley, Colin M.
Wong, Siu Fun
Hertz, Daniel L.
Drug-drug interactions in subjects enrolled in SWOG trials of oral chemotherapy
title Drug-drug interactions in subjects enrolled in SWOG trials of oral chemotherapy
title_full Drug-drug interactions in subjects enrolled in SWOG trials of oral chemotherapy
title_fullStr Drug-drug interactions in subjects enrolled in SWOG trials of oral chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Drug-drug interactions in subjects enrolled in SWOG trials of oral chemotherapy
title_short Drug-drug interactions in subjects enrolled in SWOG trials of oral chemotherapy
title_sort drug-drug interactions in subjects enrolled in swog trials of oral chemotherapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7995697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08050-w
work_keys_str_mv AT marcathlaurena drugdruginteractionsinsubjectsenrolledinswogtrialsoforalchemotherapy
AT finleycolinm drugdruginteractionsinsubjectsenrolledinswogtrialsoforalchemotherapy
AT wongsiufun drugdruginteractionsinsubjectsenrolledinswogtrialsoforalchemotherapy
AT hertzdaniell drugdruginteractionsinsubjectsenrolledinswogtrialsoforalchemotherapy