Cargando…

Development of a novel global rating scale for objective structured assessment of technical skills in an emergency medical simulation training

BACKGROUND: Medical simulation trainings lead to an improvement in patient care by increasing technical and non-technical skills, procedural confidence and medical knowledge. For structured simulation-based trainings, objective assessment tools are needed to evaluate the performance during simulatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zoller, Andreas, Hölle, Tobias, Wepler, Martin, Radermacher, Peter, Nussbaum, Benedikt L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7995755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33766007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02580-4
_version_ 1783669975194533888
author Zoller, Andreas
Hölle, Tobias
Wepler, Martin
Radermacher, Peter
Nussbaum, Benedikt L.
author_facet Zoller, Andreas
Hölle, Tobias
Wepler, Martin
Radermacher, Peter
Nussbaum, Benedikt L.
author_sort Zoller, Andreas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medical simulation trainings lead to an improvement in patient care by increasing technical and non-technical skills, procedural confidence and medical knowledge. For structured simulation-based trainings, objective assessment tools are needed to evaluate the performance during simulation and the learning progress. In surgical education, objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) are widely used and validated. However, in emergency medicine and anesthesia there is a lack of validated assessment tools for technical skills. Thus, the aim of the present study was to develop and validate a novel Global Rating Scale (GRS) for emergency medical simulation trainings. METHODS: Following the development of the GRS, 12 teams of different experience in emergency medicine (4th year medical students, paramedics, emergency physicians) were involved in a pre-hospital emergency medicine simulation scenario and assessed by four independent raters. Subsequently, interrater reliability and construct validity of the GRS were analyzed. Moreover, the results of the GRS were cross-checked with a task specific check list. Data are presented as median (minimum; maximum). RESULTS: The GRS consists of ten items each scored on a 5-point Likert scale yielding a maximum of 50 points. The median score achieved by novice teams was 22.75 points (17;30), while experts scored 39.00 points (32;47). The GRS overall scores significantly discriminated between student-guided teams and expert teams of emergency physicians (p = 0.005). Interrater reliability for the GRS was high with a Kendall’s coefficient of concordance W ranging from 0.64 to 0.90 in 9 of 10 items and 0.88 in the overall score. CONCLUSION: The GRS represents a promising novel tool to objectively assess technical skills in simulation training with high construct validity and interrater reliability in this pilot study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7995755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79957552021-03-30 Development of a novel global rating scale for objective structured assessment of technical skills in an emergency medical simulation training Zoller, Andreas Hölle, Tobias Wepler, Martin Radermacher, Peter Nussbaum, Benedikt L. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Medical simulation trainings lead to an improvement in patient care by increasing technical and non-technical skills, procedural confidence and medical knowledge. For structured simulation-based trainings, objective assessment tools are needed to evaluate the performance during simulation and the learning progress. In surgical education, objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) are widely used and validated. However, in emergency medicine and anesthesia there is a lack of validated assessment tools for technical skills. Thus, the aim of the present study was to develop and validate a novel Global Rating Scale (GRS) for emergency medical simulation trainings. METHODS: Following the development of the GRS, 12 teams of different experience in emergency medicine (4th year medical students, paramedics, emergency physicians) were involved in a pre-hospital emergency medicine simulation scenario and assessed by four independent raters. Subsequently, interrater reliability and construct validity of the GRS were analyzed. Moreover, the results of the GRS were cross-checked with a task specific check list. Data are presented as median (minimum; maximum). RESULTS: The GRS consists of ten items each scored on a 5-point Likert scale yielding a maximum of 50 points. The median score achieved by novice teams was 22.75 points (17;30), while experts scored 39.00 points (32;47). The GRS overall scores significantly discriminated between student-guided teams and expert teams of emergency physicians (p = 0.005). Interrater reliability for the GRS was high with a Kendall’s coefficient of concordance W ranging from 0.64 to 0.90 in 9 of 10 items and 0.88 in the overall score. CONCLUSION: The GRS represents a promising novel tool to objectively assess technical skills in simulation training with high construct validity and interrater reliability in this pilot study. BioMed Central 2021-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7995755/ /pubmed/33766007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02580-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zoller, Andreas
Hölle, Tobias
Wepler, Martin
Radermacher, Peter
Nussbaum, Benedikt L.
Development of a novel global rating scale for objective structured assessment of technical skills in an emergency medical simulation training
title Development of a novel global rating scale for objective structured assessment of technical skills in an emergency medical simulation training
title_full Development of a novel global rating scale for objective structured assessment of technical skills in an emergency medical simulation training
title_fullStr Development of a novel global rating scale for objective structured assessment of technical skills in an emergency medical simulation training
title_full_unstemmed Development of a novel global rating scale for objective structured assessment of technical skills in an emergency medical simulation training
title_short Development of a novel global rating scale for objective structured assessment of technical skills in an emergency medical simulation training
title_sort development of a novel global rating scale for objective structured assessment of technical skills in an emergency medical simulation training
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7995755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33766007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02580-4
work_keys_str_mv AT zollerandreas developmentofanovelglobalratingscaleforobjectivestructuredassessmentoftechnicalskillsinanemergencymedicalsimulationtraining
AT holletobias developmentofanovelglobalratingscaleforobjectivestructuredassessmentoftechnicalskillsinanemergencymedicalsimulationtraining
AT weplermartin developmentofanovelglobalratingscaleforobjectivestructuredassessmentoftechnicalskillsinanemergencymedicalsimulationtraining
AT radermacherpeter developmentofanovelglobalratingscaleforobjectivestructuredassessmentoftechnicalskillsinanemergencymedicalsimulationtraining
AT nussbaumbenediktl developmentofanovelglobalratingscaleforobjectivestructuredassessmentoftechnicalskillsinanemergencymedicalsimulationtraining