Cargando…

Epidural electrical stimulation effectively restores locomotion function in rats with complete spinal cord injury

Epidural electrical stimulation can restore limb motor function after spinal cord injury by reactivating the surviving neural circuits. In previous epidural electrical stimulation studies, single electrode sites and continuous tetanic stimulation have often been used. With this stimulation, the body...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Song, Zhang, Li-Cheng, Fu, Hai-Tao, Deng, Jun-Hao, Xu, Gao-Xiang, Li, Tong, Ji, Xin-Ran, Tang, Pei-Fu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7996032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32985490
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.290905
_version_ 1783670030735507456
author Wang, Song
Zhang, Li-Cheng
Fu, Hai-Tao
Deng, Jun-Hao
Xu, Gao-Xiang
Li, Tong
Ji, Xin-Ran
Tang, Pei-Fu
author_facet Wang, Song
Zhang, Li-Cheng
Fu, Hai-Tao
Deng, Jun-Hao
Xu, Gao-Xiang
Li, Tong
Ji, Xin-Ran
Tang, Pei-Fu
author_sort Wang, Song
collection PubMed
description Epidural electrical stimulation can restore limb motor function after spinal cord injury by reactivating the surviving neural circuits. In previous epidural electrical stimulation studies, single electrode sites and continuous tetanic stimulation have often been used. With this stimulation, the body is prone to declines in tolerance and locomotion coordination. In the present study, rat models of complete spinal cord injury were established by vertically cutting the spinal cord at the T8 level to eliminate disturbance from residual nerve fibers, and were then subjected to epidural electrical stimulation. The flexible extradural electrode had good anatomical topology and matched the shape of the spinal canal of the implanted segment. Simultaneously, the electrode stimulation site was able to be accurately applied to the L2–3 and S1 segments of the spinal cord. To evaluate the biocompatibility of the implanted epidural electrical stimulation electrodes, GFAP/Iba-1 double-labeled immunofluorescence staining was performed on the spinal cord below the electrodes at 7 days after the electrode implantation. Immunofluorescence results revealed no significant differences in the numbers or morphologies of microglia and astrocytes in the spinal cord after electrode implantation, and there was no activated Iba-1(+) cell aggregation, indicating that the implant did not cause an inflammatory response in the spinal cord. Rat gait analysis showed that, at 3 days after surgery, gait became coordinated in rats with spinal cord injury under burst stimulation. The regained locomotion could clearly distinguish the support phase and the swing phase and dynamically adjust with the frequency of stimulus distribution. To evaluate the matching degree between the flexible epidural electrode (including three stimulation contacts), vertebral morphology, and the level of the epidural site of the stimulation electrode, micro-CT was used to scan the thoracolumbar vertebrae of rats before and after electrode implantation. Based on the experimental results of gait recovery using three-site stimulation electrodes at L2–3 and S1 combined with burst stimulation in a rat model of spinal cord injury, epidural electrical stimulation is a promising protocol that needs to be further explored. This study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital (approval No. 2019-X15-39) on April 19, 2019.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7996032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79960322021-06-02 Epidural electrical stimulation effectively restores locomotion function in rats with complete spinal cord injury Wang, Song Zhang, Li-Cheng Fu, Hai-Tao Deng, Jun-Hao Xu, Gao-Xiang Li, Tong Ji, Xin-Ran Tang, Pei-Fu Neural Regen Res Research Article Epidural electrical stimulation can restore limb motor function after spinal cord injury by reactivating the surviving neural circuits. In previous epidural electrical stimulation studies, single electrode sites and continuous tetanic stimulation have often been used. With this stimulation, the body is prone to declines in tolerance and locomotion coordination. In the present study, rat models of complete spinal cord injury were established by vertically cutting the spinal cord at the T8 level to eliminate disturbance from residual nerve fibers, and were then subjected to epidural electrical stimulation. The flexible extradural electrode had good anatomical topology and matched the shape of the spinal canal of the implanted segment. Simultaneously, the electrode stimulation site was able to be accurately applied to the L2–3 and S1 segments of the spinal cord. To evaluate the biocompatibility of the implanted epidural electrical stimulation electrodes, GFAP/Iba-1 double-labeled immunofluorescence staining was performed on the spinal cord below the electrodes at 7 days after the electrode implantation. Immunofluorescence results revealed no significant differences in the numbers or morphologies of microglia and astrocytes in the spinal cord after electrode implantation, and there was no activated Iba-1(+) cell aggregation, indicating that the implant did not cause an inflammatory response in the spinal cord. Rat gait analysis showed that, at 3 days after surgery, gait became coordinated in rats with spinal cord injury under burst stimulation. The regained locomotion could clearly distinguish the support phase and the swing phase and dynamically adjust with the frequency of stimulus distribution. To evaluate the matching degree between the flexible epidural electrode (including three stimulation contacts), vertebral morphology, and the level of the epidural site of the stimulation electrode, micro-CT was used to scan the thoracolumbar vertebrae of rats before and after electrode implantation. Based on the experimental results of gait recovery using three-site stimulation electrodes at L2–3 and S1 combined with burst stimulation in a rat model of spinal cord injury, epidural electrical stimulation is a promising protocol that needs to be further explored. This study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital (approval No. 2019-X15-39) on April 19, 2019. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7996032/ /pubmed/32985490 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.290905 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Neural Regeneration Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Song
Zhang, Li-Cheng
Fu, Hai-Tao
Deng, Jun-Hao
Xu, Gao-Xiang
Li, Tong
Ji, Xin-Ran
Tang, Pei-Fu
Epidural electrical stimulation effectively restores locomotion function in rats with complete spinal cord injury
title Epidural electrical stimulation effectively restores locomotion function in rats with complete spinal cord injury
title_full Epidural electrical stimulation effectively restores locomotion function in rats with complete spinal cord injury
title_fullStr Epidural electrical stimulation effectively restores locomotion function in rats with complete spinal cord injury
title_full_unstemmed Epidural electrical stimulation effectively restores locomotion function in rats with complete spinal cord injury
title_short Epidural electrical stimulation effectively restores locomotion function in rats with complete spinal cord injury
title_sort epidural electrical stimulation effectively restores locomotion function in rats with complete spinal cord injury
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7996032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32985490
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.290905
work_keys_str_mv AT wangsong epiduralelectricalstimulationeffectivelyrestoreslocomotionfunctioninratswithcompletespinalcordinjury
AT zhanglicheng epiduralelectricalstimulationeffectivelyrestoreslocomotionfunctioninratswithcompletespinalcordinjury
AT fuhaitao epiduralelectricalstimulationeffectivelyrestoreslocomotionfunctioninratswithcompletespinalcordinjury
AT dengjunhao epiduralelectricalstimulationeffectivelyrestoreslocomotionfunctioninratswithcompletespinalcordinjury
AT xugaoxiang epiduralelectricalstimulationeffectivelyrestoreslocomotionfunctioninratswithcompletespinalcordinjury
AT litong epiduralelectricalstimulationeffectivelyrestoreslocomotionfunctioninratswithcompletespinalcordinjury
AT jixinran epiduralelectricalstimulationeffectivelyrestoreslocomotionfunctioninratswithcompletespinalcordinjury
AT tangpeifu epiduralelectricalstimulationeffectivelyrestoreslocomotionfunctioninratswithcompletespinalcordinjury