Cargando…

Effect of the Anionic Counterpart: Molybdate vs. Tungstate in Energy Storage for Pseudo-Capacitor Applications

Nickel-based bimetallic oxides (BMOs) have shown significant potential in battery-type electrodes for pseudo-capacitors given their ability to facilitate redox reactions. In this work, two bimetallic oxides, NiMoO(4) and NiWO(4), were synthesized using a wet chemical route. The structure and electro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Pratigya, Minakshi, Manickam, Whale, Jonathan, Jean-Fulcrand, Annelise, Garnweitner, Georg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7996838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33652645
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11030580
_version_ 1783670191780003840
author Sharma, Pratigya
Minakshi, Manickam
Whale, Jonathan
Jean-Fulcrand, Annelise
Garnweitner, Georg
author_facet Sharma, Pratigya
Minakshi, Manickam
Whale, Jonathan
Jean-Fulcrand, Annelise
Garnweitner, Georg
author_sort Sharma, Pratigya
collection PubMed
description Nickel-based bimetallic oxides (BMOs) have shown significant potential in battery-type electrodes for pseudo-capacitors given their ability to facilitate redox reactions. In this work, two bimetallic oxides, NiMoO(4) and NiWO(4), were synthesized using a wet chemical route. The structure and electrochemical properties of the pseudo-capacitor cathode materials were characterized. NiMoO(4) showed superior charge storage performance in comparison to NiWO(4), exhibiting a discharge capacitance of 124 and 77 F·g(−1), respectively. NiMoO(4), moreover, demonstrates better capacity retention after 1000 cycles with 87.14% compared to 82.22% for NiWO(4). The lower electrochemical performance of the latter was identified to result from the redox behavior during cycling. NiWO(4) reacts in the alkaline solution and forms a passivation layer composed of WO(3) on the electrode, while in contrast, the redox behavior of NiMoO(4) is fully reversible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7996838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79968382021-03-27 Effect of the Anionic Counterpart: Molybdate vs. Tungstate in Energy Storage for Pseudo-Capacitor Applications Sharma, Pratigya Minakshi, Manickam Whale, Jonathan Jean-Fulcrand, Annelise Garnweitner, Georg Nanomaterials (Basel) Article Nickel-based bimetallic oxides (BMOs) have shown significant potential in battery-type electrodes for pseudo-capacitors given their ability to facilitate redox reactions. In this work, two bimetallic oxides, NiMoO(4) and NiWO(4), were synthesized using a wet chemical route. The structure and electrochemical properties of the pseudo-capacitor cathode materials were characterized. NiMoO(4) showed superior charge storage performance in comparison to NiWO(4), exhibiting a discharge capacitance of 124 and 77 F·g(−1), respectively. NiMoO(4), moreover, demonstrates better capacity retention after 1000 cycles with 87.14% compared to 82.22% for NiWO(4). The lower electrochemical performance of the latter was identified to result from the redox behavior during cycling. NiWO(4) reacts in the alkaline solution and forms a passivation layer composed of WO(3) on the electrode, while in contrast, the redox behavior of NiMoO(4) is fully reversible. MDPI 2021-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7996838/ /pubmed/33652645 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11030580 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Sharma, Pratigya
Minakshi, Manickam
Whale, Jonathan
Jean-Fulcrand, Annelise
Garnweitner, Georg
Effect of the Anionic Counterpart: Molybdate vs. Tungstate in Energy Storage for Pseudo-Capacitor Applications
title Effect of the Anionic Counterpart: Molybdate vs. Tungstate in Energy Storage for Pseudo-Capacitor Applications
title_full Effect of the Anionic Counterpart: Molybdate vs. Tungstate in Energy Storage for Pseudo-Capacitor Applications
title_fullStr Effect of the Anionic Counterpart: Molybdate vs. Tungstate in Energy Storage for Pseudo-Capacitor Applications
title_full_unstemmed Effect of the Anionic Counterpart: Molybdate vs. Tungstate in Energy Storage for Pseudo-Capacitor Applications
title_short Effect of the Anionic Counterpart: Molybdate vs. Tungstate in Energy Storage for Pseudo-Capacitor Applications
title_sort effect of the anionic counterpart: molybdate vs. tungstate in energy storage for pseudo-capacitor applications
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7996838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33652645
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11030580
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmapratigya effectoftheanioniccounterpartmolybdatevstungstateinenergystorageforpseudocapacitorapplications
AT minakshimanickam effectoftheanioniccounterpartmolybdatevstungstateinenergystorageforpseudocapacitorapplications
AT whalejonathan effectoftheanioniccounterpartmolybdatevstungstateinenergystorageforpseudocapacitorapplications
AT jeanfulcrandannelise effectoftheanioniccounterpartmolybdatevstungstateinenergystorageforpseudocapacitorapplications
AT garnweitnergeorg effectoftheanioniccounterpartmolybdatevstungstateinenergystorageforpseudocapacitorapplications