Cargando…

The 100 Most-cited Articles in Abdominoplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis

BACKGROUND: Abdominoplasty is one of the most common aesthetic procedures performed globally. Research in this field is evolving, with recent emphasis on evidence-based surgery optimizing informed consent. This bibliometric analysis aimed to characterize emerging research trends and to assess the me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khajuria, Ankur, Charles, Walton N., Dutt, Atul, Hoyos, Alfredo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7997088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33786256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003426
_version_ 1783670247942782976
author Khajuria, Ankur
Charles, Walton N.
Dutt, Atul
Hoyos, Alfredo
author_facet Khajuria, Ankur
Charles, Walton N.
Dutt, Atul
Hoyos, Alfredo
author_sort Khajuria, Ankur
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Abdominoplasty is one of the most common aesthetic procedures performed globally. Research in this field is evolving, with recent emphasis on evidence-based surgery optimizing informed consent. This bibliometric analysis aimed to characterize emerging research trends and to assess the methodological quality of the highest impact abdominoplasty research. METHODS: The 100 most-cited articles in abdominoplasty were identified on Web of Science, across all available journals and years (1950–2019). Study details, including the citation count, main subject, and outcome measures, were extracted from each article by 2 independent reviewers. The level of evidence of each study was also assessed. RESULTS: The 100 most-cited articles in abdominoplasty were cited by a total of 2545 articles. Citations per article ranged from 206 to 34 (mean 65). Overall, 50 articles were assessed to be level of evidence 3, which is representative of the large number of cohort studies (n = 59) on the list. Similar numbers achieved levels 2, 4, and 5 (n = 16, 20, and 14), though none reached level 1. The main subject was operative technique in 50 articles, followed by outcomes in 34 articles. Only 7 articles utilized objective cosmetic outcome measures. Patient-reported outcome measures were employed in 25 articles, though only 5 incorporated validated questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: The most-cited research in abdominoplasty largely comprised low-to-moderate quality studies, with no article achieving the highest level of evidence. Contemporary high-quality evidence incorporating validated outcome measures is crucial to enhance shared decision-making, particularly in aesthetic procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7997088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79970882021-03-29 The 100 Most-cited Articles in Abdominoplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis Khajuria, Ankur Charles, Walton N. Dutt, Atul Hoyos, Alfredo Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Cosmetic BACKGROUND: Abdominoplasty is one of the most common aesthetic procedures performed globally. Research in this field is evolving, with recent emphasis on evidence-based surgery optimizing informed consent. This bibliometric analysis aimed to characterize emerging research trends and to assess the methodological quality of the highest impact abdominoplasty research. METHODS: The 100 most-cited articles in abdominoplasty were identified on Web of Science, across all available journals and years (1950–2019). Study details, including the citation count, main subject, and outcome measures, were extracted from each article by 2 independent reviewers. The level of evidence of each study was also assessed. RESULTS: The 100 most-cited articles in abdominoplasty were cited by a total of 2545 articles. Citations per article ranged from 206 to 34 (mean 65). Overall, 50 articles were assessed to be level of evidence 3, which is representative of the large number of cohort studies (n = 59) on the list. Similar numbers achieved levels 2, 4, and 5 (n = 16, 20, and 14), though none reached level 1. The main subject was operative technique in 50 articles, followed by outcomes in 34 articles. Only 7 articles utilized objective cosmetic outcome measures. Patient-reported outcome measures were employed in 25 articles, though only 5 incorporated validated questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: The most-cited research in abdominoplasty largely comprised low-to-moderate quality studies, with no article achieving the highest level of evidence. Contemporary high-quality evidence incorporating validated outcome measures is crucial to enhance shared decision-making, particularly in aesthetic procedures. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7997088/ /pubmed/33786256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003426 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Cosmetic
Khajuria, Ankur
Charles, Walton N.
Dutt, Atul
Hoyos, Alfredo
The 100 Most-cited Articles in Abdominoplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis
title The 100 Most-cited Articles in Abdominoplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis
title_full The 100 Most-cited Articles in Abdominoplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis
title_fullStr The 100 Most-cited Articles in Abdominoplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The 100 Most-cited Articles in Abdominoplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis
title_short The 100 Most-cited Articles in Abdominoplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis
title_sort 100 most-cited articles in abdominoplasty: a bibliometric analysis
topic Cosmetic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7997088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33786256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003426
work_keys_str_mv AT khajuriaankur the100mostcitedarticlesinabdominoplastyabibliometricanalysis
AT charleswaltonn the100mostcitedarticlesinabdominoplastyabibliometricanalysis
AT duttatul the100mostcitedarticlesinabdominoplastyabibliometricanalysis
AT hoyosalfredo the100mostcitedarticlesinabdominoplastyabibliometricanalysis
AT khajuriaankur 100mostcitedarticlesinabdominoplastyabibliometricanalysis
AT charleswaltonn 100mostcitedarticlesinabdominoplastyabibliometricanalysis
AT duttatul 100mostcitedarticlesinabdominoplastyabibliometricanalysis
AT hoyosalfredo 100mostcitedarticlesinabdominoplastyabibliometricanalysis