Cargando…

Implementing recovery resources in trauma care: impact and implications

OBJECTIVES: To identify resources that patients perceive as helpful to their recovery and to characterize the impact of the Trauma Survivor Network (TSN), a program committed to enhancing recovery through education and engagement. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PAT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simske, Natasha M., Breslin, Mary A., Hendrickson, Sarah B., York, Kenneth P., Vallier, Heather A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7997093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000045
_version_ 1783670249141305344
author Simske, Natasha M.
Breslin, Mary A.
Hendrickson, Sarah B.
York, Kenneth P.
Vallier, Heather A.
author_facet Simske, Natasha M.
Breslin, Mary A.
Hendrickson, Sarah B.
York, Kenneth P.
Vallier, Heather A.
author_sort Simske, Natasha M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify resources that patients perceive as helpful to their recovery and to characterize the impact of the Trauma Survivor Network (TSN), a program committed to enhancing recovery through education and engagement. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred eighty-five patients with musculoskeletal injuries. Two hundred eleven were exposed to TSN resources (Group 1). One hundred thirty-five patients were treated during the same period with no exposure (Group 2, control). One hundred thirty-nine patients were treated 1 to 3 months prior to TSN implementation (Group 3, control). INTERVENTION: TSN resources including educational materials, family classes, peer survivor visits, coaching, online services, and support groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A survey to assess hospital experience and perceptions about recovery. RESULTS: On a Likert scale from 0 to 5, patients were highly satisfied (mean 4.24), with no differences based on TSN exposure. Patients exposed to TSN programming reported greater perceived likelihood of recovery: mean 3.73 vs 3.41 vs 3.38, Group 1 vs Group 2 vs Group 3 (P = .05) and regarding return to daily activities: 3.69 vs 3.49 vs 3.10, P = .003. Fifty-three percent of Group 1 patients exposed to TSN programming utilized peer relationships and 42% read the educational materials provided. Support groups were also popular, with 26% of patients attending at least 1 session. Patients who recalled utilization of TSN services were overall highly satisfied with these services, mean 4.42. CONCLUSION: Patients were overall highly satisfied with their hospital stay, with those exposed to TSN services reporting greater perceived likelihood of recovery and return to daily activities. Development of nontraditional services, including peer visitation and support groups, appears to enhance expectations about recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7997093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79970932021-04-29 Implementing recovery resources in trauma care: impact and implications Simske, Natasha M. Breslin, Mary A. Hendrickson, Sarah B. York, Kenneth P. Vallier, Heather A. OTA Int Clinical/Basic Science Research Article OBJECTIVES: To identify resources that patients perceive as helpful to their recovery and to characterize the impact of the Trauma Survivor Network (TSN), a program committed to enhancing recovery through education and engagement. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred eighty-five patients with musculoskeletal injuries. Two hundred eleven were exposed to TSN resources (Group 1). One hundred thirty-five patients were treated during the same period with no exposure (Group 2, control). One hundred thirty-nine patients were treated 1 to 3 months prior to TSN implementation (Group 3, control). INTERVENTION: TSN resources including educational materials, family classes, peer survivor visits, coaching, online services, and support groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A survey to assess hospital experience and perceptions about recovery. RESULTS: On a Likert scale from 0 to 5, patients were highly satisfied (mean 4.24), with no differences based on TSN exposure. Patients exposed to TSN programming reported greater perceived likelihood of recovery: mean 3.73 vs 3.41 vs 3.38, Group 1 vs Group 2 vs Group 3 (P = .05) and regarding return to daily activities: 3.69 vs 3.49 vs 3.10, P = .003. Fifty-three percent of Group 1 patients exposed to TSN programming utilized peer relationships and 42% read the educational materials provided. Support groups were also popular, with 26% of patients attending at least 1 session. Patients who recalled utilization of TSN services were overall highly satisfied with these services, mean 4.42. CONCLUSION: Patients were overall highly satisfied with their hospital stay, with those exposed to TSN services reporting greater perceived likelihood of recovery and return to daily activities. Development of nontraditional services, including peer visitation and support groups, appears to enhance expectations about recovery. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7997093/ /pubmed/33937673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000045 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Clinical/Basic Science Research Article
Simske, Natasha M.
Breslin, Mary A.
Hendrickson, Sarah B.
York, Kenneth P.
Vallier, Heather A.
Implementing recovery resources in trauma care: impact and implications
title Implementing recovery resources in trauma care: impact and implications
title_full Implementing recovery resources in trauma care: impact and implications
title_fullStr Implementing recovery resources in trauma care: impact and implications
title_full_unstemmed Implementing recovery resources in trauma care: impact and implications
title_short Implementing recovery resources in trauma care: impact and implications
title_sort implementing recovery resources in trauma care: impact and implications
topic Clinical/Basic Science Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7997093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000045
work_keys_str_mv AT simskenatasham implementingrecoveryresourcesintraumacareimpactandimplications
AT breslinmarya implementingrecoveryresourcesintraumacareimpactandimplications
AT hendricksonsarahb implementingrecoveryresourcesintraumacareimpactandimplications
AT yorkkennethp implementingrecoveryresourcesintraumacareimpactandimplications
AT vallierheathera implementingrecoveryresourcesintraumacareimpactandimplications