Cargando…
The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A comparative study with the thoracolumbar injury classification system and severity score in children
BACKGROUND: There is no uniform classification in the pediatric population for thoracolumbar (TL) fractures, nor any operative guidelines. This study evaluates the AOSpine TL spine injury classification in the pediatric population and compares it to the thoracolumbar injury classification system (TL...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7997116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000036 |
_version_ | 1783670254252064768 |
---|---|
author | Mo, Andrew Z. Miller, Patricia E. Troy, Michael J. Rademacher, Emily S. Hedequist, Daniel J. |
author_facet | Mo, Andrew Z. Miller, Patricia E. Troy, Michael J. Rademacher, Emily S. Hedequist, Daniel J. |
author_sort | Mo, Andrew Z. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is no uniform classification in the pediatric population for thoracolumbar (TL) fractures, nor any operative guidelines. This study evaluates the AOSpine TL spine injury classification in the pediatric population and compares it to the thoracolumbar injury classification system (TLICS), which has previously been validated in pediatric spine trauma. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with operative TL injuries were identified from 2006 to 2016. Inclusion criteria included available imaging, operative records, age <18, and posterior approach. Each case was classified by AOSpine TL spine injury classification and TLICS. Each classification was compared to documented intraoperative posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) integrity as well as each other. RESULTS: Utilizing the AOSpine TL spine injury classification, 7 patients had type A injuries, 15 patients had type B injuries, and 6 patients had type C injuries; 21 patients had injuries classified as involving the PLC. Using TLICS, 16 patients had burst fractures, 6 patients had distraction injuries, and 6 patients had translation injuries; 21 patients had injuries classified as involving the PLC. Spearman correlation analysis substantiated convergence of AOSpine TL spine injury classification scores to TLICS scores (r = 0.75; 95% confidence interval, CI = 0.51 to 0.98; P < .001). Concordance between PLC integrity by each classification and intraoperative evaluation was 96% (27/28) of cases (k = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.73 to 1.08). Neurologic status was 100% concordant between the AOSpine TL spine injury classification and TLICS. CONCLUSION: There is high statistical correlation between the AOSpine TL spine injury classification and TLICS, and to intraoperative evaluation of the PLC, suggesting that the AOSpine TL spine injury classification is applicable to the pediatric population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7997116 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79971162021-04-29 The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A comparative study with the thoracolumbar injury classification system and severity score in children Mo, Andrew Z. Miller, Patricia E. Troy, Michael J. Rademacher, Emily S. Hedequist, Daniel J. OTA Int Clinical/Basic Science Research Article BACKGROUND: There is no uniform classification in the pediatric population for thoracolumbar (TL) fractures, nor any operative guidelines. This study evaluates the AOSpine TL spine injury classification in the pediatric population and compares it to the thoracolumbar injury classification system (TLICS), which has previously been validated in pediatric spine trauma. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with operative TL injuries were identified from 2006 to 2016. Inclusion criteria included available imaging, operative records, age <18, and posterior approach. Each case was classified by AOSpine TL spine injury classification and TLICS. Each classification was compared to documented intraoperative posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) integrity as well as each other. RESULTS: Utilizing the AOSpine TL spine injury classification, 7 patients had type A injuries, 15 patients had type B injuries, and 6 patients had type C injuries; 21 patients had injuries classified as involving the PLC. Using TLICS, 16 patients had burst fractures, 6 patients had distraction injuries, and 6 patients had translation injuries; 21 patients had injuries classified as involving the PLC. Spearman correlation analysis substantiated convergence of AOSpine TL spine injury classification scores to TLICS scores (r = 0.75; 95% confidence interval, CI = 0.51 to 0.98; P < .001). Concordance between PLC integrity by each classification and intraoperative evaluation was 96% (27/28) of cases (k = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.73 to 1.08). Neurologic status was 100% concordant between the AOSpine TL spine injury classification and TLICS. CONCLUSION: There is high statistical correlation between the AOSpine TL spine injury classification and TLICS, and to intraoperative evaluation of the PLC, suggesting that the AOSpine TL spine injury classification is applicable to the pediatric population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7997116/ /pubmed/33937667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000036 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Clinical/Basic Science Research Article Mo, Andrew Z. Miller, Patricia E. Troy, Michael J. Rademacher, Emily S. Hedequist, Daniel J. The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A comparative study with the thoracolumbar injury classification system and severity score in children |
title | The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A comparative study with the thoracolumbar injury classification system and severity score in children |
title_full | The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A comparative study with the thoracolumbar injury classification system and severity score in children |
title_fullStr | The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A comparative study with the thoracolumbar injury classification system and severity score in children |
title_full_unstemmed | The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A comparative study with the thoracolumbar injury classification system and severity score in children |
title_short | The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A comparative study with the thoracolumbar injury classification system and severity score in children |
title_sort | aospine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: a comparative study with the thoracolumbar injury classification system and severity score in children |
topic | Clinical/Basic Science Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7997116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moandrewz theaospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemacomparativestudywiththethoracolumbarinjuryclassificationsystemandseverityscoreinchildren AT millerpatriciae theaospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemacomparativestudywiththethoracolumbarinjuryclassificationsystemandseverityscoreinchildren AT troymichaelj theaospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemacomparativestudywiththethoracolumbarinjuryclassificationsystemandseverityscoreinchildren AT rademacheremilys theaospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemacomparativestudywiththethoracolumbarinjuryclassificationsystemandseverityscoreinchildren AT hedequistdanielj theaospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemacomparativestudywiththethoracolumbarinjuryclassificationsystemandseverityscoreinchildren AT moandrewz aospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemacomparativestudywiththethoracolumbarinjuryclassificationsystemandseverityscoreinchildren AT millerpatriciae aospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemacomparativestudywiththethoracolumbarinjuryclassificationsystemandseverityscoreinchildren AT troymichaelj aospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemacomparativestudywiththethoracolumbarinjuryclassificationsystemandseverityscoreinchildren AT rademacheremilys aospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemacomparativestudywiththethoracolumbarinjuryclassificationsystemandseverityscoreinchildren AT hedequistdanielj aospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemacomparativestudywiththethoracolumbarinjuryclassificationsystemandseverityscoreinchildren |