Cargando…

Results from the MemoryGel Post-approval Study

BACKGROUND: The approval of Mentor MemoryGel Breast Implants in November 2006 was conditional on conducting a 10-year study designed to collect long-term experience in US women with MemoryGel Breast Implants, known as the MemoryGel Post-Approval Study. METHODS: This prospective, observational 10-yea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Short, Kimberly K., Wixtrom, Roger N., Estes, Megan M., Leopold, John, Canady, John W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7997131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33786254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003402
_version_ 1783670257782620160
author Short, Kimberly K.
Wixtrom, Roger N.
Estes, Megan M.
Leopold, John
Canady, John W.
author_facet Short, Kimberly K.
Wixtrom, Roger N.
Estes, Megan M.
Leopold, John
Canady, John W.
author_sort Short, Kimberly K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The approval of Mentor MemoryGel Breast Implants in November 2006 was conditional on conducting a 10-year study designed to collect long-term experience in US women with MemoryGel Breast Implants, known as the MemoryGel Post-Approval Study. METHODS: This prospective, observational 10-year follow-up study used a current cohort design that began in 2007, which included both MemoryGel Breast Implant participants and concurrent saline controls to assess rheumatologic and neurologic signs and symptoms. The protocol was amended in 2015, which limited the scope of further data collection for the study to only secondary procedure/re-operation data for MemoryGel participants. RESULTS: Primary augmentation (n = 6743), revision augmentation (n = 2071), primary reconstruction (n = 1763), and revision reconstruction (n = 557) participants were enrolled in the Re-operation Phase Safety Set. Kaplan-Meier–estimated 10-year cumulative incidence of re-operation and explantation on a participant-level were 10.5% and 4.2% (primary augmentation), 14.1% and 7.7% (revision augmentation), 20.8% and 12.8% (primary reconstruction), and 25.0% and 16.6% (revision reconstruction). CONCLUSIONS: The Re-operation Phase of the post-approval study addressed the Kaplan-Meier implant removal and re-operation rates over time, and provided the reasons for re-operation over time. Overall, no significant new hazards, increased risk, or unexpected adverse events were identified in the MemoryGel Post-Approval Study Re-operation Phase Safety Set.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7997131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79971312021-03-29 Results from the MemoryGel Post-approval Study Short, Kimberly K. Wixtrom, Roger N. Estes, Megan M. Leopold, John Canady, John W. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Breast BACKGROUND: The approval of Mentor MemoryGel Breast Implants in November 2006 was conditional on conducting a 10-year study designed to collect long-term experience in US women with MemoryGel Breast Implants, known as the MemoryGel Post-Approval Study. METHODS: This prospective, observational 10-year follow-up study used a current cohort design that began in 2007, which included both MemoryGel Breast Implant participants and concurrent saline controls to assess rheumatologic and neurologic signs and symptoms. The protocol was amended in 2015, which limited the scope of further data collection for the study to only secondary procedure/re-operation data for MemoryGel participants. RESULTS: Primary augmentation (n = 6743), revision augmentation (n = 2071), primary reconstruction (n = 1763), and revision reconstruction (n = 557) participants were enrolled in the Re-operation Phase Safety Set. Kaplan-Meier–estimated 10-year cumulative incidence of re-operation and explantation on a participant-level were 10.5% and 4.2% (primary augmentation), 14.1% and 7.7% (revision augmentation), 20.8% and 12.8% (primary reconstruction), and 25.0% and 16.6% (revision reconstruction). CONCLUSIONS: The Re-operation Phase of the post-approval study addressed the Kaplan-Meier implant removal and re-operation rates over time, and provided the reasons for re-operation over time. Overall, no significant new hazards, increased risk, or unexpected adverse events were identified in the MemoryGel Post-Approval Study Re-operation Phase Safety Set. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7997131/ /pubmed/33786254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003402 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Breast
Short, Kimberly K.
Wixtrom, Roger N.
Estes, Megan M.
Leopold, John
Canady, John W.
Results from the MemoryGel Post-approval Study
title Results from the MemoryGel Post-approval Study
title_full Results from the MemoryGel Post-approval Study
title_fullStr Results from the MemoryGel Post-approval Study
title_full_unstemmed Results from the MemoryGel Post-approval Study
title_short Results from the MemoryGel Post-approval Study
title_sort results from the memorygel post-approval study
topic Breast
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7997131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33786254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003402
work_keys_str_mv AT shortkimberlyk resultsfromthememorygelpostapprovalstudy
AT wixtromrogern resultsfromthememorygelpostapprovalstudy
AT estesmeganm resultsfromthememorygelpostapprovalstudy
AT leopoldjohn resultsfromthememorygelpostapprovalstudy
AT canadyjohnw resultsfromthememorygelpostapprovalstudy