Cargando…
Results from the MemoryGel Post-approval Study
BACKGROUND: The approval of Mentor MemoryGel Breast Implants in November 2006 was conditional on conducting a 10-year study designed to collect long-term experience in US women with MemoryGel Breast Implants, known as the MemoryGel Post-Approval Study. METHODS: This prospective, observational 10-yea...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7997131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33786254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003402 |
_version_ | 1783670257782620160 |
---|---|
author | Short, Kimberly K. Wixtrom, Roger N. Estes, Megan M. Leopold, John Canady, John W. |
author_facet | Short, Kimberly K. Wixtrom, Roger N. Estes, Megan M. Leopold, John Canady, John W. |
author_sort | Short, Kimberly K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The approval of Mentor MemoryGel Breast Implants in November 2006 was conditional on conducting a 10-year study designed to collect long-term experience in US women with MemoryGel Breast Implants, known as the MemoryGel Post-Approval Study. METHODS: This prospective, observational 10-year follow-up study used a current cohort design that began in 2007, which included both MemoryGel Breast Implant participants and concurrent saline controls to assess rheumatologic and neurologic signs and symptoms. The protocol was amended in 2015, which limited the scope of further data collection for the study to only secondary procedure/re-operation data for MemoryGel participants. RESULTS: Primary augmentation (n = 6743), revision augmentation (n = 2071), primary reconstruction (n = 1763), and revision reconstruction (n = 557) participants were enrolled in the Re-operation Phase Safety Set. Kaplan-Meier–estimated 10-year cumulative incidence of re-operation and explantation on a participant-level were 10.5% and 4.2% (primary augmentation), 14.1% and 7.7% (revision augmentation), 20.8% and 12.8% (primary reconstruction), and 25.0% and 16.6% (revision reconstruction). CONCLUSIONS: The Re-operation Phase of the post-approval study addressed the Kaplan-Meier implant removal and re-operation rates over time, and provided the reasons for re-operation over time. Overall, no significant new hazards, increased risk, or unexpected adverse events were identified in the MemoryGel Post-Approval Study Re-operation Phase Safety Set. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7997131 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79971312021-03-29 Results from the MemoryGel Post-approval Study Short, Kimberly K. Wixtrom, Roger N. Estes, Megan M. Leopold, John Canady, John W. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Breast BACKGROUND: The approval of Mentor MemoryGel Breast Implants in November 2006 was conditional on conducting a 10-year study designed to collect long-term experience in US women with MemoryGel Breast Implants, known as the MemoryGel Post-Approval Study. METHODS: This prospective, observational 10-year follow-up study used a current cohort design that began in 2007, which included both MemoryGel Breast Implant participants and concurrent saline controls to assess rheumatologic and neurologic signs and symptoms. The protocol was amended in 2015, which limited the scope of further data collection for the study to only secondary procedure/re-operation data for MemoryGel participants. RESULTS: Primary augmentation (n = 6743), revision augmentation (n = 2071), primary reconstruction (n = 1763), and revision reconstruction (n = 557) participants were enrolled in the Re-operation Phase Safety Set. Kaplan-Meier–estimated 10-year cumulative incidence of re-operation and explantation on a participant-level were 10.5% and 4.2% (primary augmentation), 14.1% and 7.7% (revision augmentation), 20.8% and 12.8% (primary reconstruction), and 25.0% and 16.6% (revision reconstruction). CONCLUSIONS: The Re-operation Phase of the post-approval study addressed the Kaplan-Meier implant removal and re-operation rates over time, and provided the reasons for re-operation over time. Overall, no significant new hazards, increased risk, or unexpected adverse events were identified in the MemoryGel Post-Approval Study Re-operation Phase Safety Set. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7997131/ /pubmed/33786254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003402 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Breast Short, Kimberly K. Wixtrom, Roger N. Estes, Megan M. Leopold, John Canady, John W. Results from the MemoryGel Post-approval Study |
title | Results from the MemoryGel Post-approval Study |
title_full | Results from the MemoryGel Post-approval Study |
title_fullStr | Results from the MemoryGel Post-approval Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Results from the MemoryGel Post-approval Study |
title_short | Results from the MemoryGel Post-approval Study |
title_sort | results from the memorygel post-approval study |
topic | Breast |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7997131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33786254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003402 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shortkimberlyk resultsfromthememorygelpostapprovalstudy AT wixtromrogern resultsfromthememorygelpostapprovalstudy AT estesmeganm resultsfromthememorygelpostapprovalstudy AT leopoldjohn resultsfromthememorygelpostapprovalstudy AT canadyjohnw resultsfromthememorygelpostapprovalstudy |