Cargando…
Protection des professionnels de santé : moyens de protection faciale
Protecting healthcare workers exposed to toxic or infectious substances via inhalation, ingestion, or skin and mucous membrane penetration necessitates the use of proper facial protection. Exposure to chemical, biological and radiological (CBR) risks imposes the use of filtering respirators: a face...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Société Française de Médecine de Catastrophe. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7998052/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pxur.2021.03.009 |
_version_ | 1783670463353847808 |
---|---|
author | Delaval, Agnès Bertrand, Catherine |
author_facet | Delaval, Agnès Bertrand, Catherine |
author_sort | Delaval, Agnès |
collection | PubMed |
description | Protecting healthcare workers exposed to toxic or infectious substances via inhalation, ingestion, or skin and mucous membrane penetration necessitates the use of proper facial protection. Exposure to chemical, biological and radiological (CBR) risks imposes the use of filtering respirators: a face mask with broad spectrum cartridges or a hood with a blower connected to cartridges. Broad spectrum cartridges provide level 3 particle filtration for R and B risks. The COVID-19 crisis has led to much discussion about the role and use of masks to protect healthcare workers from inhaling airborne SARS-CoV-2 virus particles: wearing face masks with or without visors and goggles. Two types of masks are most commonly used in healthcare settings: FFP2 respirators and the so-called surgical masks. The latter provides barrier protection against droplets, including large respiratory particles. Most surgical masks do not effectively filter small airborne particles (5 < μm) and do not prevent leakage around the mask. However, and depending on the type of care, healthcare professionals must have their masks tightly covering the face with a level of filtration that protects the user from exposure to aerosols, i.e. use FFP2 and FFP3. Strict testing procedures should evaluate this professional equipment. The current pandemic is leading us to question the best practices and the right protection materials to put in place. Why, how and which of these facial protections fit the purpose for health care providers tasks? |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7998052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Société Française de Médecine de Catastrophe. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79980522021-03-29 Protection des professionnels de santé : moyens de protection faciale Delaval, Agnès Bertrand, Catherine Me´decine De Catastrophe, Urgences Collectives Session SFMC Protecting healthcare workers exposed to toxic or infectious substances via inhalation, ingestion, or skin and mucous membrane penetration necessitates the use of proper facial protection. Exposure to chemical, biological and radiological (CBR) risks imposes the use of filtering respirators: a face mask with broad spectrum cartridges or a hood with a blower connected to cartridges. Broad spectrum cartridges provide level 3 particle filtration for R and B risks. The COVID-19 crisis has led to much discussion about the role and use of masks to protect healthcare workers from inhaling airborne SARS-CoV-2 virus particles: wearing face masks with or without visors and goggles. Two types of masks are most commonly used in healthcare settings: FFP2 respirators and the so-called surgical masks. The latter provides barrier protection against droplets, including large respiratory particles. Most surgical masks do not effectively filter small airborne particles (5 < μm) and do not prevent leakage around the mask. However, and depending on the type of care, healthcare professionals must have their masks tightly covering the face with a level of filtration that protects the user from exposure to aerosols, i.e. use FFP2 and FFP3. Strict testing procedures should evaluate this professional equipment. The current pandemic is leading us to question the best practices and the right protection materials to put in place. Why, how and which of these facial protections fit the purpose for health care providers tasks? Société Française de Médecine de Catastrophe. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. 2021-06 2021-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7998052/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pxur.2021.03.009 Text en © 2021 Société Française de Médecine de Catastrophe. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Session SFMC Delaval, Agnès Bertrand, Catherine Protection des professionnels de santé : moyens de protection faciale |
title | Protection des professionnels de santé : moyens de protection faciale |
title_full | Protection des professionnels de santé : moyens de protection faciale |
title_fullStr | Protection des professionnels de santé : moyens de protection faciale |
title_full_unstemmed | Protection des professionnels de santé : moyens de protection faciale |
title_short | Protection des professionnels de santé : moyens de protection faciale |
title_sort | protection des professionnels de santé : moyens de protection faciale |
topic | Session SFMC |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7998052/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pxur.2021.03.009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delavalagnes protectiondesprofessionnelsdesantemoyensdeprotectionfaciale AT bertrandcatherine protectiondesprofessionnelsdesantemoyensdeprotectionfaciale |