Cargando…

Artistic Freedom or Animal Cruelty? Contemporary Visual Art Practice That Involves Live and Deceased Animals

SIMPLE SUMMARY: This paper examines a selection of 21st-century international examples of exhibited visual artworks involving live or deceased animals. It seeks to reveal the risks and benefits of unique encounters with animals through art and to consider the ethical implications of artwork deployin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coleman, Ellie, Scollen, Rebecca, Batorowicz, Beata, Akenson, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7998353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33799329
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11030812
_version_ 1783670532294574080
author Coleman, Ellie
Scollen, Rebecca
Batorowicz, Beata
Akenson, David
author_facet Coleman, Ellie
Scollen, Rebecca
Batorowicz, Beata
Akenson, David
author_sort Coleman, Ellie
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: This paper examines a selection of 21st-century international examples of exhibited visual artworks involving live or deceased animals. It seeks to reveal the risks and benefits of unique encounters with animals through art and to consider the ethical implications of artwork deploying animals. Australian and international animal protection laws are not explicit when it comes to the sourcing of animals for art nor for the direct inclusion of animals in artworks. This lack leads to a variety of artistic practices; some considered ethical while others are viewed as controversial, bordering on animal cruelty. Recommendations of how to better determine what is the acceptable use of animals in art with a view to informing legal guidelines and artistic best practice are presented. ABSTRACT: This paper examines a selection of 21st-century international examples of exhibited visual artworks involving live or deceased animals. It seeks to reveal the risks and benefits of unique encounters with animals through art and to consider the ethical implications of artwork deploying animals. Australian and international animal protection laws are not explicit when it comes to the sourcing of animals for art nor for the direct inclusion of animals in artworks. This lack leads to a variety of artistic practices, some considered ethical while others are viewed as controversial, bordering on animal cruelty. Artwork selection is determined by a focus on high-profile artists who intentionally use animals in their practice and whose reputation has been fostered by this intention. The study provides insight into how the intentional use of ethically sourced animals within art practice can be a method of addressing hierarchal human–animal imbalances. Further, this study identifies unethical practices that may be best avoided regardless of the pro-animal political statements the artists put forward. Recommendations of how to better determine what is an acceptable use of animals in art with a view to informing legal guidelines and artistic best practice are presented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7998353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79983532021-03-28 Artistic Freedom or Animal Cruelty? Contemporary Visual Art Practice That Involves Live and Deceased Animals Coleman, Ellie Scollen, Rebecca Batorowicz, Beata Akenson, David Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: This paper examines a selection of 21st-century international examples of exhibited visual artworks involving live or deceased animals. It seeks to reveal the risks and benefits of unique encounters with animals through art and to consider the ethical implications of artwork deploying animals. Australian and international animal protection laws are not explicit when it comes to the sourcing of animals for art nor for the direct inclusion of animals in artworks. This lack leads to a variety of artistic practices; some considered ethical while others are viewed as controversial, bordering on animal cruelty. Recommendations of how to better determine what is the acceptable use of animals in art with a view to informing legal guidelines and artistic best practice are presented. ABSTRACT: This paper examines a selection of 21st-century international examples of exhibited visual artworks involving live or deceased animals. It seeks to reveal the risks and benefits of unique encounters with animals through art and to consider the ethical implications of artwork deploying animals. Australian and international animal protection laws are not explicit when it comes to the sourcing of animals for art nor for the direct inclusion of animals in artworks. This lack leads to a variety of artistic practices, some considered ethical while others are viewed as controversial, bordering on animal cruelty. Artwork selection is determined by a focus on high-profile artists who intentionally use animals in their practice and whose reputation has been fostered by this intention. The study provides insight into how the intentional use of ethically sourced animals within art practice can be a method of addressing hierarchal human–animal imbalances. Further, this study identifies unethical practices that may be best avoided regardless of the pro-animal political statements the artists put forward. Recommendations of how to better determine what is an acceptable use of animals in art with a view to informing legal guidelines and artistic best practice are presented. MDPI 2021-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7998353/ /pubmed/33799329 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11030812 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Coleman, Ellie
Scollen, Rebecca
Batorowicz, Beata
Akenson, David
Artistic Freedom or Animal Cruelty? Contemporary Visual Art Practice That Involves Live and Deceased Animals
title Artistic Freedom or Animal Cruelty? Contemporary Visual Art Practice That Involves Live and Deceased Animals
title_full Artistic Freedom or Animal Cruelty? Contemporary Visual Art Practice That Involves Live and Deceased Animals
title_fullStr Artistic Freedom or Animal Cruelty? Contemporary Visual Art Practice That Involves Live and Deceased Animals
title_full_unstemmed Artistic Freedom or Animal Cruelty? Contemporary Visual Art Practice That Involves Live and Deceased Animals
title_short Artistic Freedom or Animal Cruelty? Contemporary Visual Art Practice That Involves Live and Deceased Animals
title_sort artistic freedom or animal cruelty? contemporary visual art practice that involves live and deceased animals
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7998353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33799329
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11030812
work_keys_str_mv AT colemanellie artisticfreedomoranimalcrueltycontemporaryvisualartpracticethatinvolvesliveanddeceasedanimals
AT scollenrebecca artisticfreedomoranimalcrueltycontemporaryvisualartpracticethatinvolvesliveanddeceasedanimals
AT batorowiczbeata artisticfreedomoranimalcrueltycontemporaryvisualartpracticethatinvolvesliveanddeceasedanimals
AT akensondavid artisticfreedomoranimalcrueltycontemporaryvisualartpracticethatinvolvesliveanddeceasedanimals