Cargando…

News about the Role of Fluid and Imaging Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Diseases

Biomarkers are molecules that are variable in their origin, nature, and mechanism of action; they are of great relevance in biology and also in medicine because of their specific connection with a single or several diseases. Biomarkers are of two types, which in some cases are operative with each ot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Meldolesi, Jacopo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7999537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33806691
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9030252
_version_ 1783670805209546752
author Meldolesi, Jacopo
author_facet Meldolesi, Jacopo
author_sort Meldolesi, Jacopo
collection PubMed
description Biomarkers are molecules that are variable in their origin, nature, and mechanism of action; they are of great relevance in biology and also in medicine because of their specific connection with a single or several diseases. Biomarkers are of two types, which in some cases are operative with each other. Fluid biomarkers, started around 2000, are generated in fluid from specific proteins/peptides and miRNAs accumulated within two extracellular fluids, either the central spinal fluid or blood plasma. The switch of these proteins/peptides and miRNAs, from free to segregated within extracellular vesicles, has induced certain advantages including higher levels within fluids and lower operative expenses. Imaging biomarkers, started around 2004, are identified in vivo upon their binding by radiolabeled molecules subsequently revealed in the brain by positron emission tomography and/or other imaging techniques. A positive point for the latter approach is the quantitation of results, but expenses are much higher. At present, both types of biomarker are being extensively employed to study Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases, investigated from the presymptomatic to mature stages. In conclusion, biomarkers have revolutionized scientific and medical research and practice. Diagnosis, which is often inadequate when based on medical criteria only, has been recently improved by the multiplicity and specificity of biomarkers. Analogous results have been obtained for prognosis. In contrast, improvement of therapy has been limited or fully absent, especially for Alzheimer’s in which progress has been inadequate. An urgent need at hand is therefore the progress of a new drug trial design together with patient management in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7999537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79995372021-03-28 News about the Role of Fluid and Imaging Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Diseases Meldolesi, Jacopo Biomedicines Review Biomarkers are molecules that are variable in their origin, nature, and mechanism of action; they are of great relevance in biology and also in medicine because of their specific connection with a single or several diseases. Biomarkers are of two types, which in some cases are operative with each other. Fluid biomarkers, started around 2000, are generated in fluid from specific proteins/peptides and miRNAs accumulated within two extracellular fluids, either the central spinal fluid or blood plasma. The switch of these proteins/peptides and miRNAs, from free to segregated within extracellular vesicles, has induced certain advantages including higher levels within fluids and lower operative expenses. Imaging biomarkers, started around 2004, are identified in vivo upon their binding by radiolabeled molecules subsequently revealed in the brain by positron emission tomography and/or other imaging techniques. A positive point for the latter approach is the quantitation of results, but expenses are much higher. At present, both types of biomarker are being extensively employed to study Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases, investigated from the presymptomatic to mature stages. In conclusion, biomarkers have revolutionized scientific and medical research and practice. Diagnosis, which is often inadequate when based on medical criteria only, has been recently improved by the multiplicity and specificity of biomarkers. Analogous results have been obtained for prognosis. In contrast, improvement of therapy has been limited or fully absent, especially for Alzheimer’s in which progress has been inadequate. An urgent need at hand is therefore the progress of a new drug trial design together with patient management in clinical practice. MDPI 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7999537/ /pubmed/33806691 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9030252 Text en © 2021 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Review
Meldolesi, Jacopo
News about the Role of Fluid and Imaging Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Diseases
title News about the Role of Fluid and Imaging Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Diseases
title_full News about the Role of Fluid and Imaging Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Diseases
title_fullStr News about the Role of Fluid and Imaging Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Diseases
title_full_unstemmed News about the Role of Fluid and Imaging Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Diseases
title_short News about the Role of Fluid and Imaging Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Diseases
title_sort news about the role of fluid and imaging biomarkers in neurodegenerative diseases
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7999537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33806691
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9030252
work_keys_str_mv AT meldolesijacopo newsabouttheroleoffluidandimagingbiomarkersinneurodegenerativediseases