Cargando…

Acute Pulmonary Embolism Severity Assessment Evaluated with Dual Energy CT Perfusion Compared to Conventional CT Angiographic Measurements

The purpose of the study was to investigate whether Dual Energy CT (DECT) can be used as a diagnostic tool to assess the severity of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) by correlating parenchymal perfusion defect volume, obstruction score and right ventricular-to-left ventricular (RV/LV) diameter ratio us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jawad, Samir, Ulriksen, Peter Sommer, Kalhauge, Anna, Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8000326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33799729
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030495
_version_ 1783670977064861696
author Jawad, Samir
Ulriksen, Peter Sommer
Kalhauge, Anna
Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov
author_facet Jawad, Samir
Ulriksen, Peter Sommer
Kalhauge, Anna
Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov
author_sort Jawad, Samir
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the study was to investigate whether Dual Energy CT (DECT) can be used as a diagnostic tool to assess the severity of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) by correlating parenchymal perfusion defect volume, obstruction score and right ventricular-to-left ventricular (RV/LV) diameter ratio using CT angiography (CTA) and DECT perfusion imaging. A total of 43 patients who underwent CTA and DECT perfusion imaging with clinical suspicion of acute PE were retrospectively included in the study. In total, 25 of these patients had acute PE findings on CTA. DECT assessed perfusion defect volume (PDvol) were automatically and semiautomatically quantified. Overall, two CTA methods for risk assessment in patients with acute PE were assessed: the RV/LV diameter ratio and the Modified Miller obstruction score. Automatic PDvol had a weak correlation (r = 0.47, p = 0.02) and semiautomatic PDvol (r = 0.68, p < 0.001) had a moderate correlation to obstruction score in patients with confirmed acute PE, while only semiautomatic PDvol (r = 0.43, p = 0.03) had a weak correlation with the RV/LV diameter ratio. Our data indicate that PDvol assessed by DECT software technique may be a helpful tool to assess the severity of acute PE when compared to obstruction score and RV/LV diameter ratio.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8000326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80003262021-03-28 Acute Pulmonary Embolism Severity Assessment Evaluated with Dual Energy CT Perfusion Compared to Conventional CT Angiographic Measurements Jawad, Samir Ulriksen, Peter Sommer Kalhauge, Anna Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov Diagnostics (Basel) Article The purpose of the study was to investigate whether Dual Energy CT (DECT) can be used as a diagnostic tool to assess the severity of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) by correlating parenchymal perfusion defect volume, obstruction score and right ventricular-to-left ventricular (RV/LV) diameter ratio using CT angiography (CTA) and DECT perfusion imaging. A total of 43 patients who underwent CTA and DECT perfusion imaging with clinical suspicion of acute PE were retrospectively included in the study. In total, 25 of these patients had acute PE findings on CTA. DECT assessed perfusion defect volume (PDvol) were automatically and semiautomatically quantified. Overall, two CTA methods for risk assessment in patients with acute PE were assessed: the RV/LV diameter ratio and the Modified Miller obstruction score. Automatic PDvol had a weak correlation (r = 0.47, p = 0.02) and semiautomatic PDvol (r = 0.68, p < 0.001) had a moderate correlation to obstruction score in patients with confirmed acute PE, while only semiautomatic PDvol (r = 0.43, p = 0.03) had a weak correlation with the RV/LV diameter ratio. Our data indicate that PDvol assessed by DECT software technique may be a helpful tool to assess the severity of acute PE when compared to obstruction score and RV/LV diameter ratio. MDPI 2021-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8000326/ /pubmed/33799729 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030495 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Jawad, Samir
Ulriksen, Peter Sommer
Kalhauge, Anna
Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov
Acute Pulmonary Embolism Severity Assessment Evaluated with Dual Energy CT Perfusion Compared to Conventional CT Angiographic Measurements
title Acute Pulmonary Embolism Severity Assessment Evaluated with Dual Energy CT Perfusion Compared to Conventional CT Angiographic Measurements
title_full Acute Pulmonary Embolism Severity Assessment Evaluated with Dual Energy CT Perfusion Compared to Conventional CT Angiographic Measurements
title_fullStr Acute Pulmonary Embolism Severity Assessment Evaluated with Dual Energy CT Perfusion Compared to Conventional CT Angiographic Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Acute Pulmonary Embolism Severity Assessment Evaluated with Dual Energy CT Perfusion Compared to Conventional CT Angiographic Measurements
title_short Acute Pulmonary Embolism Severity Assessment Evaluated with Dual Energy CT Perfusion Compared to Conventional CT Angiographic Measurements
title_sort acute pulmonary embolism severity assessment evaluated with dual energy ct perfusion compared to conventional ct angiographic measurements
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8000326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33799729
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030495
work_keys_str_mv AT jawadsamir acutepulmonaryembolismseverityassessmentevaluatedwithdualenergyctperfusioncomparedtoconventionalctangiographicmeasurements
AT ulriksenpetersommer acutepulmonaryembolismseverityassessmentevaluatedwithdualenergyctperfusioncomparedtoconventionalctangiographicmeasurements
AT kalhaugeanna acutepulmonaryembolismseverityassessmentevaluatedwithdualenergyctperfusioncomparedtoconventionalctangiographicmeasurements
AT hansenkristofferlindskov acutepulmonaryembolismseverityassessmentevaluatedwithdualenergyctperfusioncomparedtoconventionalctangiographicmeasurements