Cargando…
The Cohabitation of Humans and Urban Cats in the Anthropocene: The Clash of Welfare Concepts
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Current cultural shifts in Western countries have changed the position of the cat to a companion animal, and its traditional role as a pest controller is no longer recognized by city dwellers. In a growing number of theoretical and field studies, the hunting abilities of cats and the...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8000346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33807860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11030705 |
_version_ | 1783670981233999872 |
---|---|
author | Jaroš, Filip |
author_facet | Jaroš, Filip |
author_sort | Jaroš, Filip |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Current cultural shifts in Western countries have changed the position of the cat to a companion animal, and its traditional role as a pest controller is no longer recognized by city dwellers. In a growing number of theoretical and field studies, the hunting abilities of cats and their high fertility are perceived as environmental risks. Bringing together theoretical perspectives from human–animal studies, animal ethics, population ecology, and biosemiotics, I highlight the existence of two different ecological (and even cultural) communities inhabiting urban environments: the culture of feral cats and the humano–cat culture of pets. Arguments are given for the essential role of feral cats in the population dynamics of the species when a growing number of pet cats are routinely neutered. Whereas neutering is presented by animal shelters and veterinary institutions as a universal means for improving cat welfare, it is at odds with the psychobiological needs of cats as viewed by a laissez-faire approach. This leads us to the conclusion that instead of one type of management of free-roaming cats, individual solutions should be sought to achieve a balance between the welfare of cats, other species, and human cultures in diverse urban environments. ABSTRACT: Urban environments are inhabited by several types of feline populations, which we can differentiate as feral cats, free-roaming pets, and confined pets. Due to a shift in the cultural representation of cats from pest controllers to companion animals, cats living semi-independently of humans are perceived increasingly negatively, while the pet population has become the object of intense care. A regulative approach converges with a concern for welfare in the operation and educational campaigns of municipal shelters, which through their implementation of neutering policies have proven to be key players in the contemporary relation of urban cats and humans. The generally widespread notion of cat welfare associated with a secure life comes into tension with the fact that the psychobiological needs of feral cats are significantly different than those of pets. It becomes apparent that individual interactions between humans and cats in urban environments in the Anthropocene are increasingly influenced by the intervention of institutions that can be characterized as seeking to administer the wild. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8000346 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80003462021-03-28 The Cohabitation of Humans and Urban Cats in the Anthropocene: The Clash of Welfare Concepts Jaroš, Filip Animals (Basel) Commentary SIMPLE SUMMARY: Current cultural shifts in Western countries have changed the position of the cat to a companion animal, and its traditional role as a pest controller is no longer recognized by city dwellers. In a growing number of theoretical and field studies, the hunting abilities of cats and their high fertility are perceived as environmental risks. Bringing together theoretical perspectives from human–animal studies, animal ethics, population ecology, and biosemiotics, I highlight the existence of two different ecological (and even cultural) communities inhabiting urban environments: the culture of feral cats and the humano–cat culture of pets. Arguments are given for the essential role of feral cats in the population dynamics of the species when a growing number of pet cats are routinely neutered. Whereas neutering is presented by animal shelters and veterinary institutions as a universal means for improving cat welfare, it is at odds with the psychobiological needs of cats as viewed by a laissez-faire approach. This leads us to the conclusion that instead of one type of management of free-roaming cats, individual solutions should be sought to achieve a balance between the welfare of cats, other species, and human cultures in diverse urban environments. ABSTRACT: Urban environments are inhabited by several types of feline populations, which we can differentiate as feral cats, free-roaming pets, and confined pets. Due to a shift in the cultural representation of cats from pest controllers to companion animals, cats living semi-independently of humans are perceived increasingly negatively, while the pet population has become the object of intense care. A regulative approach converges with a concern for welfare in the operation and educational campaigns of municipal shelters, which through their implementation of neutering policies have proven to be key players in the contemporary relation of urban cats and humans. The generally widespread notion of cat welfare associated with a secure life comes into tension with the fact that the psychobiological needs of feral cats are significantly different than those of pets. It becomes apparent that individual interactions between humans and cats in urban environments in the Anthropocene are increasingly influenced by the intervention of institutions that can be characterized as seeking to administer the wild. MDPI 2021-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8000346/ /pubmed/33807860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11030705 Text en © 2021 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Commentary Jaroš, Filip The Cohabitation of Humans and Urban Cats in the Anthropocene: The Clash of Welfare Concepts |
title | The Cohabitation of Humans and Urban Cats in the Anthropocene: The Clash of Welfare Concepts |
title_full | The Cohabitation of Humans and Urban Cats in the Anthropocene: The Clash of Welfare Concepts |
title_fullStr | The Cohabitation of Humans and Urban Cats in the Anthropocene: The Clash of Welfare Concepts |
title_full_unstemmed | The Cohabitation of Humans and Urban Cats in the Anthropocene: The Clash of Welfare Concepts |
title_short | The Cohabitation of Humans and Urban Cats in the Anthropocene: The Clash of Welfare Concepts |
title_sort | cohabitation of humans and urban cats in the anthropocene: the clash of welfare concepts |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8000346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33807860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11030705 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jarosfilip thecohabitationofhumansandurbancatsintheanthropocenetheclashofwelfareconcepts AT jarosfilip cohabitationofhumansandurbancatsintheanthropocenetheclashofwelfareconcepts |