Cargando…

Comparison of the Phenolic Compound Profile and Antioxidant Potential of Achillea atrata L. and Achillea millefolium L.

In the present study, Achillea atrata L. and A. millefolium L. were compared for the first time with regard to their phenolic compound profile and antioxidant activity by applying the 2,2-diphenyl-picryl hydrazyl radical assay. For this purpose, aerial plant parts were consecutively extracted with s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salomon, Lysanne, Lorenz, Peter, Bunse, Marek, Spring, Otmar, Stintzing, Florian C., Kammerer, Dietmar R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8000477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33799635
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26061530
_version_ 1783671008633290752
author Salomon, Lysanne
Lorenz, Peter
Bunse, Marek
Spring, Otmar
Stintzing, Florian C.
Kammerer, Dietmar R.
author_facet Salomon, Lysanne
Lorenz, Peter
Bunse, Marek
Spring, Otmar
Stintzing, Florian C.
Kammerer, Dietmar R.
author_sort Salomon, Lysanne
collection PubMed
description In the present study, Achillea atrata L. and A. millefolium L. were compared for the first time with regard to their phenolic compound profile and antioxidant activity by applying the 2,2-diphenyl-picryl hydrazyl radical assay. For this purpose, aerial plant parts were consecutively extracted with solvents of increasing polarity (dichloromethane, n-butanol, ethyl acetate), revealing that the A. atrata ethyl acetate fraction showed the highest antioxidant activity with an IC(50) value of 12.2 ± 0.29 µg/mL compared to 17.0 ± 0.26 µg/mL for A. millefolium. Both species revealed the presence of luteolin, apigenin, centaureidin, and nevadensin exclusively in this most polar fraction, which are known as effective 2,2-diphenyl-picryl hydrazyl radical scavengers. The antioxidant capacity of the aforementioned fractions strikingly correlated with their total phenolic contents, which was highest in the ethyl acetate fraction of A. atrata. Characterization of the metabolite profiles of both Achillea species showed only marginal differences in the presence of key compounds, whereas the concentrations of individual compounds appeared to be species-specific. Our results suggest that A. atrata, based on its compound pattern and bioactivity characteristics, has similar qualities for phytotherapy as A. millefolium.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8000477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80004772021-03-28 Comparison of the Phenolic Compound Profile and Antioxidant Potential of Achillea atrata L. and Achillea millefolium L. Salomon, Lysanne Lorenz, Peter Bunse, Marek Spring, Otmar Stintzing, Florian C. Kammerer, Dietmar R. Molecules Communication In the present study, Achillea atrata L. and A. millefolium L. were compared for the first time with regard to their phenolic compound profile and antioxidant activity by applying the 2,2-diphenyl-picryl hydrazyl radical assay. For this purpose, aerial plant parts were consecutively extracted with solvents of increasing polarity (dichloromethane, n-butanol, ethyl acetate), revealing that the A. atrata ethyl acetate fraction showed the highest antioxidant activity with an IC(50) value of 12.2 ± 0.29 µg/mL compared to 17.0 ± 0.26 µg/mL for A. millefolium. Both species revealed the presence of luteolin, apigenin, centaureidin, and nevadensin exclusively in this most polar fraction, which are known as effective 2,2-diphenyl-picryl hydrazyl radical scavengers. The antioxidant capacity of the aforementioned fractions strikingly correlated with their total phenolic contents, which was highest in the ethyl acetate fraction of A. atrata. Characterization of the metabolite profiles of both Achillea species showed only marginal differences in the presence of key compounds, whereas the concentrations of individual compounds appeared to be species-specific. Our results suggest that A. atrata, based on its compound pattern and bioactivity characteristics, has similar qualities for phytotherapy as A. millefolium. MDPI 2021-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8000477/ /pubmed/33799635 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26061530 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Salomon, Lysanne
Lorenz, Peter
Bunse, Marek
Spring, Otmar
Stintzing, Florian C.
Kammerer, Dietmar R.
Comparison of the Phenolic Compound Profile and Antioxidant Potential of Achillea atrata L. and Achillea millefolium L.
title Comparison of the Phenolic Compound Profile and Antioxidant Potential of Achillea atrata L. and Achillea millefolium L.
title_full Comparison of the Phenolic Compound Profile and Antioxidant Potential of Achillea atrata L. and Achillea millefolium L.
title_fullStr Comparison of the Phenolic Compound Profile and Antioxidant Potential of Achillea atrata L. and Achillea millefolium L.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Phenolic Compound Profile and Antioxidant Potential of Achillea atrata L. and Achillea millefolium L.
title_short Comparison of the Phenolic Compound Profile and Antioxidant Potential of Achillea atrata L. and Achillea millefolium L.
title_sort comparison of the phenolic compound profile and antioxidant potential of achillea atrata l. and achillea millefolium l.
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8000477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33799635
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26061530
work_keys_str_mv AT salomonlysanne comparisonofthephenoliccompoundprofileandantioxidantpotentialofachilleaatratalandachilleamillefoliuml
AT lorenzpeter comparisonofthephenoliccompoundprofileandantioxidantpotentialofachilleaatratalandachilleamillefoliuml
AT bunsemarek comparisonofthephenoliccompoundprofileandantioxidantpotentialofachilleaatratalandachilleamillefoliuml
AT springotmar comparisonofthephenoliccompoundprofileandantioxidantpotentialofachilleaatratalandachilleamillefoliuml
AT stintzingflorianc comparisonofthephenoliccompoundprofileandantioxidantpotentialofachilleaatratalandachilleamillefoliuml
AT kammererdietmarr comparisonofthephenoliccompoundprofileandantioxidantpotentialofachilleaatratalandachilleamillefoliuml