Cargando…
Comparison of the Phenolic Compound Profile and Antioxidant Potential of Achillea atrata L. and Achillea millefolium L.
In the present study, Achillea atrata L. and A. millefolium L. were compared for the first time with regard to their phenolic compound profile and antioxidant activity by applying the 2,2-diphenyl-picryl hydrazyl radical assay. For this purpose, aerial plant parts were consecutively extracted with s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8000477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33799635 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26061530 |
_version_ | 1783671008633290752 |
---|---|
author | Salomon, Lysanne Lorenz, Peter Bunse, Marek Spring, Otmar Stintzing, Florian C. Kammerer, Dietmar R. |
author_facet | Salomon, Lysanne Lorenz, Peter Bunse, Marek Spring, Otmar Stintzing, Florian C. Kammerer, Dietmar R. |
author_sort | Salomon, Lysanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the present study, Achillea atrata L. and A. millefolium L. were compared for the first time with regard to their phenolic compound profile and antioxidant activity by applying the 2,2-diphenyl-picryl hydrazyl radical assay. For this purpose, aerial plant parts were consecutively extracted with solvents of increasing polarity (dichloromethane, n-butanol, ethyl acetate), revealing that the A. atrata ethyl acetate fraction showed the highest antioxidant activity with an IC(50) value of 12.2 ± 0.29 µg/mL compared to 17.0 ± 0.26 µg/mL for A. millefolium. Both species revealed the presence of luteolin, apigenin, centaureidin, and nevadensin exclusively in this most polar fraction, which are known as effective 2,2-diphenyl-picryl hydrazyl radical scavengers. The antioxidant capacity of the aforementioned fractions strikingly correlated with their total phenolic contents, which was highest in the ethyl acetate fraction of A. atrata. Characterization of the metabolite profiles of both Achillea species showed only marginal differences in the presence of key compounds, whereas the concentrations of individual compounds appeared to be species-specific. Our results suggest that A. atrata, based on its compound pattern and bioactivity characteristics, has similar qualities for phytotherapy as A. millefolium. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8000477 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80004772021-03-28 Comparison of the Phenolic Compound Profile and Antioxidant Potential of Achillea atrata L. and Achillea millefolium L. Salomon, Lysanne Lorenz, Peter Bunse, Marek Spring, Otmar Stintzing, Florian C. Kammerer, Dietmar R. Molecules Communication In the present study, Achillea atrata L. and A. millefolium L. were compared for the first time with regard to their phenolic compound profile and antioxidant activity by applying the 2,2-diphenyl-picryl hydrazyl radical assay. For this purpose, aerial plant parts were consecutively extracted with solvents of increasing polarity (dichloromethane, n-butanol, ethyl acetate), revealing that the A. atrata ethyl acetate fraction showed the highest antioxidant activity with an IC(50) value of 12.2 ± 0.29 µg/mL compared to 17.0 ± 0.26 µg/mL for A. millefolium. Both species revealed the presence of luteolin, apigenin, centaureidin, and nevadensin exclusively in this most polar fraction, which are known as effective 2,2-diphenyl-picryl hydrazyl radical scavengers. The antioxidant capacity of the aforementioned fractions strikingly correlated with their total phenolic contents, which was highest in the ethyl acetate fraction of A. atrata. Characterization of the metabolite profiles of both Achillea species showed only marginal differences in the presence of key compounds, whereas the concentrations of individual compounds appeared to be species-specific. Our results suggest that A. atrata, based on its compound pattern and bioactivity characteristics, has similar qualities for phytotherapy as A. millefolium. MDPI 2021-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8000477/ /pubmed/33799635 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26061530 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Communication Salomon, Lysanne Lorenz, Peter Bunse, Marek Spring, Otmar Stintzing, Florian C. Kammerer, Dietmar R. Comparison of the Phenolic Compound Profile and Antioxidant Potential of Achillea atrata L. and Achillea millefolium L. |
title | Comparison of the Phenolic Compound Profile and Antioxidant Potential of Achillea atrata L. and Achillea millefolium L. |
title_full | Comparison of the Phenolic Compound Profile and Antioxidant Potential of Achillea atrata L. and Achillea millefolium L. |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Phenolic Compound Profile and Antioxidant Potential of Achillea atrata L. and Achillea millefolium L. |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Phenolic Compound Profile and Antioxidant Potential of Achillea atrata L. and Achillea millefolium L. |
title_short | Comparison of the Phenolic Compound Profile and Antioxidant Potential of Achillea atrata L. and Achillea millefolium L. |
title_sort | comparison of the phenolic compound profile and antioxidant potential of achillea atrata l. and achillea millefolium l. |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8000477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33799635 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26061530 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salomonlysanne comparisonofthephenoliccompoundprofileandantioxidantpotentialofachilleaatratalandachilleamillefoliuml AT lorenzpeter comparisonofthephenoliccompoundprofileandantioxidantpotentialofachilleaatratalandachilleamillefoliuml AT bunsemarek comparisonofthephenoliccompoundprofileandantioxidantpotentialofachilleaatratalandachilleamillefoliuml AT springotmar comparisonofthephenoliccompoundprofileandantioxidantpotentialofachilleaatratalandachilleamillefoliuml AT stintzingflorianc comparisonofthephenoliccompoundprofileandantioxidantpotentialofachilleaatratalandachilleamillefoliuml AT kammererdietmarr comparisonofthephenoliccompoundprofileandantioxidantpotentialofachilleaatratalandachilleamillefoliuml |